Micro 677: Double Day Unlimited in Wifom City - Town Win
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
essentially achieving our best case scenario {scum lynch} is worth the risk of the worst case {town lynch}. we don't gimp our chances later into the game by town lynching, and since we lynch scummy players our best case is always better. we get little info from the nks and relying on those flips gives scum the opportunity to dictate the information we get opposed to us choosing who we flip.-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
I'm arguing that you fake hammeredIn post 180, Towns Last Hope wrote:
Probably because nobody called l-1, or even l-2, and another guy quickhammered off of thatIn post 172, Lycanfire wrote:fake hammers are fine but a posthumous one is fishy. how can you not know that the fifth vote is on the board?
I don't know what you're arguing - we're scummy because we didn't know they were already hammered when we fake hammered...? What's the correlationpreciselybecause you knew there was a hammer
unless we can get lynches resolved at the same time allowing for a triple lynch i don't see much of a point in voting the entire wagon right nowIn post 181, Towns Last Hope wrote:or why if you think that, you only placed a single vote on us-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
We have infinite votes and you went for a fake hammer, on someone already hammered. It was scummy because for all you knew the thread would get locked and when everyone is busy making sense of what happened, they would see you were vote #1 not vote #5/6. That looks good on you, maybe even NM if the wagon is perceived as a clusterfuck. Then when someone who doesn't bother reading the thread speaks up about it on thread unlock you could claim reaction test.
What is it testing in this scenario?In post 187, Martha Zolanski wrote:Well, I think that fake hammer isn't scummy af since I think some people use that as a RT.
Shouldn't you be asking what the town motive is for fake hammering on a hammer? If your SR was on the wagon why aren't you getting whatever we can out of it?In post 194, GuiltyLion wrote:if there were two scum on the wagon, how does one of them doing a fake hammer distract from that?-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
Sorry I've already read the game three times I didn't feel like there was much more I could say beyond that I was willing to vote for NM if TLH wasn't going to work.
I didn't like how GL took a hard angle on my case v. TLH when they supposedly had a scumread on Martha.
Hiraki appeared and asked the same questions I was asked twice over
Like, I'll go over it re: 239 just in the case that my word choice made sense in my head but not others.
1) I think it was indicative of someone wanting the Alisae wagon to look chaotic
2) I don't think the posthumous hammer is necessarily scum
3) (2, cont) with the assumption of double scum on the wagon, I think the fake hammer is AI. Continuing that line of thought I think it's most likely NM to necessitate point 1.
I get the impression from Hiraki's post 239 that they appeared to want to work with myself but didn't seem to care to do the same with NM or TLH. I think the triple vote is pretty dishonest here. Who exactly do you want to lynch today?-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
That post I promised
My original comment may not have been scum indicative but we had nothing to go with, and it was definitely strange, so I ran with it. I feel likenobody really triedto push me off this. Both GL and Hiraki questioned me, but I don't feel like either have tried to explicitly push me away. Tiershift isn't doing it either, his reasoning is that I'm talking about one thing. That's not a push, that's fishing for a read.
I'm discounting splitscum, and the wagon looks worse than offwagon.
Offwagon isn't being opportunistic with my argument. An offwagon team would only question and not push me away if they thought I would tunnel this. Which I think is ridiculous because I wasn't going to and I doubt any one here knows me better than I know myself. That's out.
Meanwhile the wagon shades/refuses to engage me. I'm happy lynching in TLH|NM. VOTE: NM-
-
Lycanfire
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
-
-
Lycanfire
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
I think you're town Nydus, but I also think there's not much to be gained from pressing Tier right now, even if you feel like he should have had a better impression of your townplay.
I don't like how Hiraki's reads have developed from what is a cut and paste from day 1. TLH refuses to answer what they thought the composition for the Alisae wagon was. They had a gross interaction day 1 and despite feeling like they have more presence, they seem lazier than Tier. That's suss.-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
Phonepostin
@GL
Because TLH has been coasting all game and Hiraki's day2 entrance was "insert day 1 post". That's why I didn't think having tier answer his already discussed meta read mattered.
@tier
I thought your "lycan is only discussing one thing" post was town intentioned because Iwasposting about one thing to see how people would react and interpret it. See my earlier post. I feel like I struck scum on TLH regardless.-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
Give me a guessIn post 461, Towns Last Hope wrote:
Uh, what? We've been asking you what question you were asking multiple times yesterday. Also, I don't understand what the question is? You're asking if I think scum were on Alisae? I don't think there's any way to really deduce that with how it happenedIn post 434, Lycanfire wrote:TLH refuses to answer what they thought the composition for the Alisae wagon was. They had a gross interaction day 1 and despite feeling like they have more presence, they seem lazier than Tier. That's suss.
Your posting is lazy and your ardently stick to your reads schtick is your coasting mechanism.In post 463, Hiraki wrote:Can you identify how I've been coasting? This day has now 2 pages into it.
Just because you didn't like the answer you got today (which is identical from the answer that you got yesterday) doesn't mean you can use different words to describe it.-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
this is a pure misrep. i scumhunted by creating an issue and seeing where peoples' opinions landed. what the fuck is your idea of scumhunting in this game? making a lynch pool and have them claim VT? you've done absolutely nothing in this game besides creating a lynchpool and wave your arms saying you made a post a few weeks ago.In post 468, Hiraki wrote:Lycan is looking to lynch; not looking to lynch scum. This is found a lot in his D1 posting. There's no real scumhunting just identification of scumtells - if that makes some sense? This is probably bad wording but I hope my point comes across clearly.
waiting on TLH to stop ignoring the game and answer the question. titus kept my vote but i'm okay lynching in this today. VOTE: TLH-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
Multi votes are only dishonest if you don't have any intention to lynch those people. You had three votes with no reasons behind them.In post 477, Hiraki wrote:remember when Lycan said that double voting is bad and you shouldn't do it because it's dishonest to who you actually want to lynch and then he proceeds to do it right now (his votes are on me and TLH, something he wanted to do from the start of D2) very secretly
I explicitly said I was townreading you day 1. That's why I was happy with an NM lynch. Why do you assume I was?In post 477, Hiraki wrote:remember when Lycan said that I shouldn't be copy/pasting my reads from D1 (again, with no reasoning why I shouldn't do that if nothing has changed) and then proceeds to vote his two SRs from D1?
How about the issue that you're freaking out that I revoted TLH? If you want him lynched why are you getting defensive? I see a vote on TLH but posts keep coming my way (outside your icky 471 that wasIn post 477, Hiraki wrote:what issue did you create? a stupid theory that no one is following based off of a fake-hammer thing that could just be a mistake?promptedby TLH in 462). This is a bluff.
Play stupid games, earn stupid prizes.-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
your post was shit because the only shade you've been putting on TLH is the shade you've been prompted by TLH to make. it's manufactured.In post 479, Hiraki wrote:In post 478, Lycanfire wrote:I explicitly said I was townreading you day 1.
Very big town read. Very explicit and there's nothing implied.In post 265, Lycanfire wrote:I get the impression from Hiraki's post 239 that they appeared to want to work with myself but didn't seem to care to do the same with NM or TLH. I think the triple vote is pretty dishonest here. Who exactly do you want to lynch today?
continue to keep calling my posts icky/bad/etc. without explaining, it is definitely working (i guess?)
and yeah-right. i'm not scumhunting or anything. keep pushing your narrative.
here's the post i was talking about.
In post 403, Lycanfire wrote:That post I promised
My original comment may not have been scum indicative but we had nothing to go with, and it was definitely strange, so I ran with it. I feel likenobody really triedto push me off this. Both GL and Hiraki questioned me, but I don't feel like either have tried to explicitly push me away. Tiershift isn't doing it either, his reasoning is that I'm talking about one thing. That's not a push, that's fishing for a read.
I'm discounting splitscum, and the wagon looks worse than offwagon.
Offwagon isn't being opportunistic with my argument. An offwagon team would only question and not push me away if they thought I would tunnel this. Which I think is ridiculous because I wasn't going to and I doubt any one here knows me better than I know myself. That's out.
Meanwhile the wagon shades/refuses to engage me. I'm happy lynching in TLH|NM. VOTE: NM-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
Why do you care about other peoples opinions if you're reading them as town? Reinforcing someone's read doesn't advance the game state. It doesn't get people to vote with you.In post 486, Hiraki wrote:Instead of refuting your posts, I'll just drop this here from two people who are in high disagreement at the moment:
In post 467, GuiltyLion wrote:I have a hard time believing that Lycan is genuinely accusing Hiraki is coasting when his own posting on D2 has been naked votes and then very simplistic explanations of them
Why Tiershift and not Nydus?In post 488, Towns Last Hope wrote:Tiershift and GL what say you?
Titus confirms me as town. Who are you lynching instead?In post 489, GuiltyLion wrote:all that said I'd still like to lynch Lycan first and foremost-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
A monkey appears in the thread and rips off TLH's head. He flips scum. Who do you want to lynch?In post 504, GuiltyLion wrote:@Mod can we get a deadline pause while we wait for a Tier replacement
Lycan I'd lynch TLH if you flip town, I think
They both made similar posts in 486/488 yet they're cross scumreading each other. Are those posts furthering their reads on one another?In post 503, nydushermain wrote:I don't honestly think much of it at all. I mean, I can say that I think it's not super likely for them to be together because of the EoD vote from one of them onto the other when we were trying to scramble and try to find someone we could agreeable lynch but even then... I don't think it really rules them out completely. Dunno.-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
you said you liked hiraki/nydus in 416 and expanded that to one of hiraki/myself and one of gl/nydus. why do you care what tiershift has to say if he's barely in the game while you townread him?In post 512, Towns Last Hope wrote:
I wasn't talking to nydushIn post 499, Lycanfire wrote:
Why Tiershift and not Nydus?In post 488, Towns Last Hope wrote:Tiershift and GL what say you?
fucking try it if you can come up with a read that isn't unnecessarily crypticIn post 514, Towns Last Hope wrote:I could theoretically hammer lycanfire right now.-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
Firey bullshit. Even if Lycan is always scum I don't deserve to be speedlynched when I'm trying to solve the game.
I would bet the game on Michael scum.
1) NK proves TLH was bussed
2) TLH had Nydus/GL in lynchpool but was only making posts to promote GL as his alt-wagon
3) Lack of coordination between the wagons TLH/Hiraki were promoting
4) Michael had been buddying me then simultaneously accused GL and TLH in post 543-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
-
-
Lycanfire Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2896
- Joined: June 4, 2016
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-