[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 8933023 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 689: Oddrole Mafia II (Game over!) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #33 (isolation #10) » Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:33 pm
Postby lane0168 »
I understand the vote though. Vote the only person trying to do anything. The only one different from the heard. It'd be hard to justify putting your vote anywhere else non rvs eh?
What? Are you concerned about being called out for lurking or something? Not digging this preemptive defense. Who said you were lurking? You just posted...
Post
Post #45 (isolation #16) » Sat Mar 04, 2017 3:18 am
Postby lane0168 »
Ahh yes, I have a grudge, just not with any of you. Creature shot me I think. Hey bang. From your point of view, why is sweets and why is Eddie voting me. Separate questions
Post
Post #55 (isolation #20) » Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:58 am
Postby lane0168 »
In post 48, lane0168 wrote:Considering its odd role, I better let people know that's not true lol
Regarding my role claim pimhel. I thought it wpuld be obvious I was just joking with Alban, but I said this in case someone actually believed me. So they wouldn't believe me. I guess it didn't help
Post
Post #56 (isolation #21) » Sat Mar 04, 2017 11:01 am
Postby lane0168 »
In post 53, PimHel wrote:If I thought they were scummy, I would have mentioned them. That's all I'm going to say about them before they explain their votes (which they should).
My thoughts about your claim have yet to be gathered. But I think I have a grasp where it could be possible.
I don't always like to wait for something to be scummy before I start talking about it. Being active and getting people to talk is how scummy things get said.
Post
Post #83 (isolation #27) » Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:12 am
Postby lane0168 »
Sweets-vote lane for no reasoning
Eddie-sheep sweets for no reason
Lane- ask for reasoning
Sweets- vote cloud with no reasoning
Eddie- sheep sweets for no reason
Lane- VOTE: eddie
In post 53, PimHel wrote:If I thought they were scummy, I would have mentioned them. That's all I'm going to say about them before they explain their votes (which they should).
My thoughts about your claim have yet to be gathered. But I think I have a grasp where it could be possible.
I don't always like to wait for something to be scummy before I start talking about it. Being active and getting people to talk is how scummy things get said.
activity is NAI and I don't like how defensive you're getting over 2 rvs votes
4 posts, nothing alignment indicative. active lurking in the flesh.
I'm not sure where I'm being super defensive. More offensive against shit votes...
And they were very clearly NOT rvs. Why are you trying to paint me being defensive about rvs votes when at least one explicitly said not rvs? Shady shit.
And if you didn't like me being so defensive about rvs votes, which they weren't, why aren't you don't anything to push me, and moving your vote, but not to me?
Post
Post #104 (isolation #29) » Sun Mar 05, 2017 4:39 pm
Postby lane0168 »
In post 102, Eddie Cane wrote:because half the game isn't posting and I can't vote everyone?
Then why aren't you voting the person that's doing things you don't like, over 1 of several people don't the same thing. One would assume that makes them all nai, no?
Non-RVS. I have a dayvig and I'm prepared to use it.
Obviously not, you voted instead...
In post 33, lane0168 wrote:I understand the vote though. Vote the only person trying to do anything. The only one different from the heard. It'd be hard to justify putting your vote anywhere else non rvs eh?
In post 34, lane0168 wrote:Hey sweets, any reason you didn't post here this morning? Come back... I've been waiting for someone actually interested in getting this thing started
In post 36, lane0168 wrote:Let's play a game called who's got worse reasoning... Loser is today's lynch. Eddie you give yours first since you're here. Then sweets can go.
In post 39, lane0168 wrote:It's a bold strategy cotton, let's see if it plays off for him... You're up sweets lol
What? Are you concerned about being called out for lurking or something? Not digging this preemptive defense. Who said you were lurking? You just posted...
In post 45, lane0168 wrote:Ahh yes, I have a grudge, just not with any of you. Creature shot me I think. Hey bang. From your point of view, why is sweets and why is Eddie voting me. Separate questions
Just secret. No idea what a double secret would do :S
Can you give reasons why you reacted the way you did to the votes against you?
P-edit: You only have two votes against you? You're not at L-1
Because the were dumb as shit and empty. Can you give reasons why you didn't react to them at all?
And did you read the rest of the post? And Albans, and my following post? Regarding the l-1
In post 61, lane0168 wrote:Pm, what else do you have to say about eddie
He had his chance to explain his sheep and didn't
not defensive my ass rofl half your posts are in response to 2 rvs votes on you... and yes, they were clearly rvs, they were in the first 2 pages of a thread they aren't locked cases.
So you're doubling down on calling votes rvs when they say non rvs... And calling your own vote rvs? Just Randomly came right after a non rvs post?
If it says "non rvs" that does not mean rvs. It means not rvs. You can tell by the way it says "non rvs"
All of this is irrelevant, considering those aren't defensive posts. I'm not surprised you're confused about the difference between defensive and offensive, considering you don't know what 3 letter words like "non" mean.
First one wasnt even responding to the votes... Strike 1 on you for misrepping
Second one is pointing out sweets vote on basically the only one talking
How is the third one defensive??? Are you high? Or just purposely being dumb
Ok... I'm not even going to respond to the rest cause they have nothing to do with the votes and you're being super bad
spending over half your content spamming about 2 first page votes is not town motivated. picking apart terminology isn't either. newsflash buddy: idk why sbf voted you but clearly first page votes aren't set in stone. sheeping a random vote gets reactions sometimrs: such as from airheads who get super whiny over 2 votes that don't matter. you aren't even trying to scumhunt, you're omgusing and trying to appear active while not even contributing to discussion.
... You may omgused. Lol @I'm not even trying to scumhunt. Simply not true. Not contributing to discussion? Not true again.
Post
Post #119 (isolation #33) » Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:59 am
Postby lane0168 »
In post 116, Eddie Cane wrote:why would "offensively" spending so much time replying to the votes be better? it's the definition of splitting hairs. my bite did its job, you're caught scum now.
Yes, generating discussion when there is literally nothing going on is your scumtell? Your bite didn't do shit. You're only trying to make it seem like it did. Funny that you weren't doing shit before you got votes on you and all of a sudden you think you caught scum... Kind of a peculiar turn of events eh?
Post
Post #122 (isolation #34) » Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:46 am
Postby lane0168 »
What are you talking about? Why are you acting like talking about the votes is a bad thing?! You're literally taking something and putting all your effort to make it seem scummy! Look at the game state you dope!
Look at your own fucking iso for fucks sake. It's self explanatory.
Post
Post #123 (isolation #35) » Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:48 am
Postby lane0168 »
In post 120, Eddie Cane wrote:show me your contributions and scum hunting outside of the votes on you
Why does it have to be outside of the votes? You show me yours. It's the only fucking thing that's happened this game. Jesus what else is there, and why haven't you talked about it yet?! Your whole case is I'm talking about the votes and only the votes, when you're only talking about the votes!!
4 posts, nothing alignment indicative. active lurking in the flesh.
The game is boring as Fuck... Whining... So why are you saying I'm whining again?
But if it's boring as Fuck what does that mean? That there isn't shit going on? Not shit to talk about?
What else should I be talking about? You aren't talking about anything except bitching that I'm talking about the votes. What else should I be talking about???
I didn't vote you immediately after sbf. 33 pinged me really hard. it was worthy of the vote to see what you did after it. turns out, 1 vote made you nervous and 2 votes made you spend 3/4s of the thread discussing them.
So you're saying your vote wasn't rvs. But before you insisted both votes on me were rvs. Gotcha. Just trying to figure out why you're contradicting yourself here
Post
Post #163 (isolation #38) » Wed Mar 08, 2017 2:14 pm
Postby lane0168 »
48 hours and not even a page later... I just realized Eddie voted himself. Mustve been the dark avis I thought it was cloud. I'm not one to call someone self voting to be acting in a town way, so I won't do that.
On the other hand. I could lynch one of these damn lurkers. Staying away from the game and doing not much of anything while Eddie holds on for dear life... So that means Eddie is scum, or not scum.
Albans replace out its suspicious to me. Normally I don't think anything if it but when he makes a point to say he likes it slow, doesn't really have to do anything to keep caught up, and replaces out... It makes me uncomfortable.
I don't think I could call anyone on the wagon scum at this point.
Cloud could be scum though, seems to be looking for the favor of the crowds on this page.
In post 163, lane0168 wrote:Cloud could be scum though, seems to be looking for the favor of the crowds on this page.
Expected that, i know what i projected when i said i had no real reads and it can comes off as getting the favor of the crowd but it was just honest truth
Yeah, there literally isn't anything to go off of... So I understand I'm nitpicking but really, what do you do in a game like this? There needs to be some sort of explosion of content or something
Post
Post #174 (isolation #41) » Wed Mar 08, 2017 4:54 pm
Postby lane0168 »
In post 166, bangthemafia wrote:@Lane, u r talking in circles now. Do you feel Eddie is scum or his self vote and unvote has made him less scummy for u?
I'm not following what the question is. I'm talking in circles out loud because that's how I think. And I'm just trying to get something, anything going. I think the best way I can contribute is to say everything I think, and hope it naturally stimulates conversation. It's how I approach the game.
In post 166, bangthemafia wrote:@Lane, u r talking in circles now. Do you feel Eddie is scum or his self vote and unvote has made him less scummy for u?
I'm not following what the question is. I'm talking in circles out loud because that's how I think. And I'm just trying to get something, anything going. I think the best way I can contribute is to say everything I think, and hope it naturally stimulates conversation. It's how I approach the game.
Post
Post #198 (isolation #44) » Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:05 pm
Postby lane0168 »
It's not really something that's explainable... It's something that you either recognize or don't... And cloud mentioning it and me isoing you, I can see what cloud is saying. And I agree.
@horror ,as I've said before, I would've questioned the first non rvs with no reason regardless of it being on me or anyone else. In case you didn't notice, there wasn't shit to comment on (I see you did notice) and I wanted explanations.
In post 198, lane0168 wrote:It's not really something that's explainable... It's something that you either recognize or don't... And cloud mentioning it and me isoing you, I can see what cloud is saying. And I agree.
So in other words, you don't have a reason.
Umm, no. Those aren't accurate other words whatsoever
You have Mob Mentality - At night you can make a user post whatever you want in the thread OR silence them the next day
Your mission is: have 5 users post ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ raise your dongers ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ.in one cycle
You are allied with YOURSELF haha!
"Why the theatrics? Scummy!" - lane
Please don't confuse theatrics surrounding a vote with whatever that post is of Eddies.
You thought, huh, I'm gonna switch my vote to lane cause I know Eddie is willing to vote there, but I already called lane town. This will look shady considering he's voting me, and several other people have sheeped without reason. I'm going to get called out on it so before that happens, I'll make it seem more jokey and call myself out instead of actually explaining and being serious about my scum read on lane, cause I don't have one.
Scum think theatrics surrounding actual game related things that could incriminate them will help make them seem less serious, and less likely to have to answer for them.
Post
Post #215 (isolation #48) » Fri Mar 10, 2017 6:56 am
Postby lane0168 »
Post 242 in TBD mafia is a perfect and most recent example. Everyone took a questionnaire and one of the questions was what alignment you prefer to be.
"I wanted to be
S C U M" - narna
Instead of just saying scum, she thought putting it like this would make it less serious and somehow make people less likely to believe that's what she actually rolled. I thought it was bs and she was doing exactly that whereas everyone else didn't recognize it. I was right.
Its the same thing with your vote. Different circumstances. Same concept
In post 214, lane0168 wrote:.
instead of actually explaining and being serious about my scum read on lane, cause I don't have one.
This is pure garbage considering YOU don't have a reason for voting ME other than sheeping cloud.
"Oh, I can't explain it. It's just something you have to feel, man."
Get real.
First of all, it'd be great if you wouldn't take people's posts out if context. This was related to you trying to shroud your vote in theatrics.
Second of all, I said something you recognize, not something you feel. A feel implies gut. But if we boil it down to gut...
Third of all, do you think gut is a scummy reason to vote someone early stages of a game?
You make it seem like I sheeped cloud without reason. That's simply not true. He said something, and voted you. I iso'd you and recognized what he was saying.
Now you can't call my reason bs and ignore clouds.
What motive do I have to sheep cloud for no reason if I don't think he has good reason? Why would scum sheep a vote like that? The fact you're not considering any of that makes me more convinced you're not really trying to solve or sort anything. You picked a target and went with it
I do not like this vote. This vote totally stinks, and it needs rope.
VOTE: SweetBlueFlowers
Total sheep vote, no explanation, no interaction to get this vote, go with the momentum where it's heading. Scum mentality.
I already explained it lmao. My hard TR was at L-1 so I put a townlean at L-1 to take the pressure off.
Also bang is obvscum lol.
If Cloud is right then scumteam is bang/michael lmfao game solved.
VOTE: michael
Why you scum read me?
Don't tell me if cloud is right than i am scum, tell me what you think
This is awful , i don't feel like you actually believe what you are saying VOTE: SweetBlueFlowers[/V
I still didn't answer what? What are you talking about?
I do not like this vote. This vote totally stinks, and it needs rope.
VOTE: SweetBlueFlowers
Total sheep vote, no explanation, no interaction to get this vote, go with the momentum where it's heading. Scum mentality.
I already explained it lmao. My hard TR was at L-1 so I put a townlean at L-1 to take the pressure off.
Also bang is obvscum lol.
If Cloud is right then scumteam is bang/michael lmfao game solved.
VOTE: michael
You never explained anything you've done so far. And that first paragraph is shady as shit. Why would you vote a town read for a town read? Why wouldn't you just try to find scum? Like town normally do...
Post
Post #307 (isolation #57) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:15 am
Postby lane0168 »
@sweet, you said you already explained something, I said you haven't explained anything ever. You said you didn't know you had to explain everything... Wtf?
If you're going to say you explained something already, at least have explained it already...
And please, don't explain how to play mafia to me. If your explanation includes lying, empty nothingness, and voting town reads to "keep town reads alive". There's another way to keep town reads alive and it doesn't involve voting town reads. It's called making cases and what not.
Post
Post #382 (isolation #59) » Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:03 am
Postby lane0168 »
In post 349, CloudKicker wrote:just sheep me, if i cant get the mod to reveal someone alignement by tomorow morning then i am mefia, isnt this a sweet ass deal ?
Considering sweets roll... How likely do you think you'll actually be able to use your role?