What's up
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
What does this mean?In post 21, momo wrote:@LQ, do you expect scum to be overly hyper on the first page??? I will try not to mislynch you this game though.
What was the point of this question?In post 23, LaLight wrote:I know you are quite a strong town player, but can you tell me any game you're scum in? Thanks!
Essentially, I find it much more likely for town to put themselves out there this early on. I also think his thought process makes a lot of sense as town but I don't see why he would be so convoluted as scum.In post 75, duppin wrote:Could you explain this read?In post 69, Infinity 324 wrote:I don't understand LQ but I'm pretty sure he's town so that's fine.
Actually several players have called him town now but no one has bothered to explain why. I'd like to know if I am missing something or if it's just a character read.
Also, didn't you townread LQ? Why did you?In post 74, Infinity 324 wrote:What was the point of this question?In post 23, LaLight wrote:I know you are quite a strong town player, but can you tell me any game you're scum in? Thanks!
No
There so little depth in your reads, you don't seem to be trying to scumhunt.In post 154, LaLight wrote:for?
I feel like you could give a lot more than "these people aren't scumhunting". Like I think duppin has given a lot that could be intepreted as scumhunting, same with ZZZX. I was expecting an analysis of that rather than just dismissal. I also think that zzzx's aggressive tone and policy opinions are pretty NAI. Like why do you think scum would do that and not town?In post 158, LaLight wrote:I am sorry, but 144 pages and 365 LQ's posts? From what I saw by skimming LQ's posts there were contentless and short, which is definitely not the case here.In post 156, Infinity 324 wrote:There so little depth in your reads, you don't seem to be trying to scumhunt.In post 154, LaLight wrote:for?
You also never followed up on that LQ game you asked for, which makes me think you didn't really care about it.
Depth? I have no idea what depth do you want given 7 pages of the game in which nothing really happened. Sorry, I really don't have anything bright to put my claws in.
...In post 191, GuiltyLion wrote:let's all take a hard look at comment because this is meant to move the N_M wagon along without actually committing to any kind of read on himIn post 161, Infinity 324 wrote:n_m plays the same as town and scum pretty much. Exactly like this.
Whats the first sentence about?In post 194, momo wrote:This will prob raise some questions but VOTE: infinity
In his iso, he compliments someone, but never fully sticks on it. Like buddying to get called out on buddying.
He has voted for both N_M and LaLight, the two biggest wagons of the day.
He took away an rvs vote on LQ just because he does not scumread him, I have only seen scum flip flop on rvs vote. Generall what I have seen is town is that the rvs vote stays UNTIL you scum read someone and that is when it change. Unvoting an rvs vote seems like bullying.
This is scum.
Pedit: LQ: trust this
...lolIn post 217, momo wrote:Did you not read this.In post 214, momo wrote:You claimed cop in a mountainous setup.
VOTE: Not_Mafia
Lynch this someone.
Pedit: Your play is a joke. We are lynching you.
Yes, I read your posts but I don't remember them that well.In post 252, duppin wrote:So you thought I had given a lot that could be intepreted as scumhunting yet you did not know what?
What?In post 254, duppin wrote:Not a fan of what he is doing today at all though, it seems very opportunistic
HmmIn post 272, duppin wrote:Because I've explained the read several times. I think he is town for his push/read on momo d1, while I did not agree with the read itself I thought it was very townie for him to have a read there and then give it later on when he engaged me when he had no reason to do so.In post 269, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Why didn't you elaborate here when you elaborated on everyone else? It makes the read look fake and like you are trying to make Town!moonbird a gimme when it isn't.
I know, you and Infinity already said so but that's not the read I got. I thought the way momo engaged NM was super town. The way he reacted to the cop claim etc, I just can't see a scum legitimately trying to push on that. I mean unless momo likes to do dumb tells but meh. I liked it.I Town read momo for pretty much the exact opposite concept. I like momo's read on Infinity which is why I am Town reading momo. All the interactions from momo with NM can be faked pretty easily.
True, I never directly said I scumread you but I called your play out several times d1 and questioned the town reads on you as I did not understand them at all, because I thought what you did was suspicious and I disliked your reads.this one def needs more elaboration at the very least. For one, you never said once you were Scum reading me so I don't know how you could "feel better about LQ" when you said this earlier
The reason I feel better about you now comes down to the fact that I believe you are approaching the game the correct way like I said earlier (as in trying to force town to play town) + I really liked GL's read on you and I have sort of been sheeping it. You're still not really a hard town read but I feel okay about you.
I agreed with everything you said regarding NM, not everything you've said all game, and I believe the same thing you called NM out for pretty much applied to momo as well (at the time).So how can you both agree with everything I have said but disagree with things I have said? It makes no sense.
Uh what, is it bs before I haven't brought it up before? Really? I hadn't commented on several players until now. I also fail to see how bringing up the read makes me sound good.This is right BS right here. You never talk about your Town read on GL once before this. You never talk about GL before this at all. So it looks like you are just making up a read to make yourself sound good.I absolutely can. I thought Infinity was fairly town based on his play, the fact that he didn't throw out a readlist doesn't change anything. Stop trying to apply your self meta to me, we obviously do not read the game the same way. I agree with the approach taht we should get players to contribute to the game, but that does not mean I'm only townreading players who throw out all kind of reads. Also he did in fact throw out reads, which was pretty much the main reason I actually townread him, like I just said so. I thought the way he went at LaLight was townie and I also admitted that it's probably a bit biased but I still felt good about it.You can't both agree with me about me saying you need to provide reasons for your reads and then Town read someone for not providing reads for stuff. You say you liked what Infinity did D1. What did you like about Infinity? You haven't said what you have liked about infinity, just that you liked him D1 and that is with the conundrum that Infinity doesn't provide reasons for his reads. There is only one reason to Town read Infinity and I'm leaving that up to you to tell me what that is.
I couldn't care less about your "only one reason" to town read infinity.
It is possible yes, but I thought what he did was super suspicious no matter what NM's alignment was.You are Scum reading LaLight for NAI reasons.
Because I have absolutely nothing at all. He has mainly been discussing game mechanics, but has also called out a couple of players including you. Ultimately he hasn't really done enough for me to warrant a townread but I don't think he has said anything suspicious either. I'd like to see him do something more, but honestly at the moment my focus is elsewhere.Why no explanation here? Nothing just leaving it blank? Why?
I think you're tunneling dudeIn post 282, momo wrote:Reads can change...
This one has not.
I read the post as manipulative. Town would address my concerns and try to turn this into something that could move the game along. Scum would just say that our scum read based of multiple points makes no sense and try to manipulate us without any real evidence as seen in 278.
Lol, this is townIn post 289, momo wrote:Good responses GL, everything above was pretty much BS concocted by me to get reads on a slot I had no reads out. Give what looks like a reasonable reason to scum read someone and judge their response. You passed the test.
The reads have no depth to them.In post 292, LicketyQuickety wrote:This Reads list is a reaction test, just so you're all aware. I'm not going to say what I am looking for, I expect others to be able to figure it out if they are Town.In post 291, LicketyQuickety wrote:I have Town reads on GL, momo. Reason for this is that they are thinking about the game critically and generally have a Town narrative and are game solving.
I have as somewhat less of a Town read on ZZZX and Lalight. ZZZX seems to have a Town perspective and is thinking about the game, same with LaLight. The reason these two are not as high of Town reads as the other two is because they are not playing as game solvay in an active way.
Next we have Infinity 324 and moonbird. These players are doing some things that Town players do, but they are not quite doing enough to show they are Town. Consider these very slight Town reads or Null reads.
Lastly, duppin, who has seemed to have given up which is not a Town mentality to have. I expect Town to want to fight their lynch to the bitter end.
Why?In post 302, LicketyQuickety wrote:Good stuff @LaLight, I like you for Town now.
Why do you usually not townread people and why would you this game?In post 305, LaLight wrote:by the way. As far as I hate townreading people and never do this, this particular game might be an exception, otherwise it would be too crazy. But! I am not townreading momo just yet
Why not lazy town who just remember n_m's play in a certain way and was wrongIn post 314, duppin wrote:But no one had claimed to have a scumread at him, people were calling his play anti town. LaLight apparently had another read on him at that point, which then immediately changed after he looked at his ISO. I think if LaLight was interested in evaluating the wagon he would've checked NM's ISO before commenting on it.
Good question, I think you have to look at the places where they actually do put in effort.In post 322, duppin wrote:But how do you determine the difference between a lazy town and scum just trying to lay low and fake contribution? I think he fits in either world, I'm not really getting any townvibes from his posts. The only post I really liked was his response to my question (regarding NM), but that's not really enough.
This line is so scummy...why are the responses towny? Why do you unvote if they can be easily faked? Why not vote zzzx, your other scumread, here?In post 335, LaLight wrote:Actually, your responses are somewhat townie, but can be easily faked. But okay, UNVOTE: .
Missing the point. I'm not saying all scum are obvious and everyone uses the same things as scumtells. I'm saying I don't believe you really think duppin is scummy because he brought up the fact that LQ's reasoning for n_m being scum also applied to his previous scumread. Like I can kinda get where you're coming from that it's a tiny bit off to say that and then vote n_m but there's no way you can reliably say someone would do that as scum and not town.If there would be strong scummy aspects of someone's posting, we would all just vote for the guy and lynch him. And win. Looking at the smallest aspects is the thing I love this whole game for. I am sorry, but do you really always look for huge scummy narrative? Don't think so.
This is fair enough though.About 107-149, look above for clarification. i haven't read anyone back then and only then I reread the whole game.
I pointed out specific things with duppin's play, like the read on you and the overdefensiveness and I was thinking about how they could come from town or scum. You didn't do that.In post 349, LicketyQuickety wrote:And lets be clear, you were not specific at all when you quoted my interaction with duppin. Why is what I did in this reads list worse than what you are doing with your response to my conversation with duppin?
I'm a sucker for a good stream of consciouness, but that one seemed pretty fakeable. There was nothing special about it to me. Yes scum are less likely to post when the thread is dead but they do need to post at some point or people will wonder where they are. Maybe lalight thought taking the initiative would make him look town.In post 349, LicketyQuickety wrote:Because I like his stream of consciousness. I like that he was doing that when the thread was dead. It looked very natural and didn't look like he was hiding anything, just straight stream of consciousness when nothing was happening in the thread, and he didn't make bad points either.
I like this explanation better.In post 353, LaLight wrote:Apparently I started to put more suspicion in the game. momo plays townie - but is it a towntell for him? I hope you know what I mean. I don't like it when the person who always plays scummy suddenly starts playing very townie. Something's always wrong there: either they's a pr or scum. Former is not the case.In post 346, Infinity 324 wrote:That's everyone.
See I don't really understand how much changed between 300 and now. You explained duppin, but apparently you're suspicious of momo where you townread him before. You also are null on moon and guilty where you apparently townread them before. Can you explain why you townread those 3 people before and what changed?
Why are me and momo scummy for you.
PEdit: @lalight
Told already about moon: TRed by me D1, then disappeared, then I reread those posts and yeah, for the beginning of D1 they're pretty townie, but it's a Golden Age of townie posts. In the last game I've played, Normal 1903, I was scum and earned quite a lot of towncred solely based on D1. As it turned out, I won this game at 3-person LyLo.
I need to reread GL, that's what I am gonna do next.
Your playstyle is cautious and calculated. May be your meta, but your posts look like you reread them after writing to make them more neutral. scumtell imo.
Also, god it's freaking hard to play with 8 people knowing nothing about them (except that momo is usually mislynched)
No?In post 364, ZZZX wrote:This is kinda of a weird stance to take on a read, Are you trying to distance yourself from the lynch while being ready to join in on it?In post 359, Infinity 324 wrote:I could vote zzzx but I don't think what's he's doing is scummy. Even though he needs to post more game-relevant content.
This pinged my scumdar for some reason. Anyway will take note.
Huh, can you take one of my points and explain why? I didn't think my points were too off the wall but maybe you're right that I'm having trouble articulating them.In post 372, LicketyQuickety wrote:Your reasons for Scum reading LaLight are unrealistic and not grounded in what is typical in the slightest. I don't think you are making up reasons, but it sure looks like your points miss the mark. That's why they don't count for much. You also don't articulate your points well enough considering they are largely unconventional methods to read people.In post 366, Infinity 324 wrote:@360: My point is not that lalight must be scum because he looks town, my point is that it's not a hard thing for scum to do and not a reason for much of a townread imo. Also I pointed out the issues I have with lalight, do you disagree with them?
...In post 392, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 333, Infinity 324 wrote:Ok
VOTE: lalight
Sorry gl, but that case is just so stretchy and lalight is focusing way too much on small aspects of duppin's posting.This kind of post sequence doesn't come from a town thought processIn post 334, Infinity 324 wrote:Ooh, and duppin didn't even post between 107 and 149. That's pretty scummy to change that read without additional clarification then.
If town!Infinity had thought LaLight's read change without clarification was bad and possibly scummy, he would have looked into whether duppin had posted in between LaLight's posts of his own accord. He would have tried to see if he could find an explanation for LaLight's read switch, evidence that would fit in town!LaLight world or scum!LaLight world, and double-check himself and investigate to strengthen his beliefs/opinions before casting his vote.
However, what happened here is Infinity wrote that he thought LaLight is scum and voted accordingly, thenwent back and found more evidence afterwardsto support his case. That reads much more like a scum mindset. Infinity wasn't even finished looking for what happened in the thread before he started trying to sell a conclusion.