Micro 753: Votefuckery (Game Over)
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
hey all! typically i only replace into games that i've been following along with, but for this one i've only read a bit. i read the first parts of the thread about up through page 8 and i've also read the most recent parts of the thread. i'll do a full reread now. anything speficially anyone would like to tell me?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i don't think not mafia needs to hide his scumreads of people behind things like that - he doesn't really need (or rather, he doesn't typically use) a huge excuse to just say that people are scum.In post 671, Maruchan wrote:
Because you havent seen a trend of me coming in and posting 5 or 6 times in a row as I catch up so this definitely was a random statement and not an attempt to call me scum....In post 668, Not_Mafia wrote:Next person to post is scum
Yeah no. You've played with me before and hsve plenty of experience with my posting style to know this would land on me. Nice joke though snd way to hide your scumread of me behind a meme
do you scumread him for that?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
okay, so there are 9 people in this game. i have absolutely no idea how to read alisae, beeboy and sakura. beeboy's getting the votes frozen was a really questionable move but everything from there involving those three i think goes outside of the realm of the game and into the personal. not only can i not read into that, but i don't think i would really want to. i'm sorry for this sort of cop out on these people, but i honestly have no idea how to approach that. hopefully going forward we can ignore all that and i can get a clearer picture.In post 683, PenguinPower wrote:VOTE: ASP
Vote stays until he catches up or gets replaced.
Where are you at, at least at a somewhat high level, right now?In post 682, northsidegal wrote:although i'm still working on forming reads on other people
i liked maru's initial catch up post but nothing else from that iso really does anything for me and i left the recent interactions i had with maru feeling strange. maru's read progression on sheep was weird but i could reasonably see it as wanting a flip to move the game along, would like others' input on that.
a simple plan hasn't really added anything - posts like 220, 394 and 390 spend a lot of time talking about the argument, game experience and other things not really relevant to scumhunting.
not mafia is, as always, an enigma. despite his meta, as town i would typically expect him to have reads that he would be pursuing, even if he doesn't give explanations, ie he would pick up on something and then start voting that person for it, even if he wouldn't really make a case. i don't think he's really done that this game. there was the fake hammer in 516, but i'm not sure that really means anything.
i'm pretty confident sobolev is town. this comes from both the play in 475 and from agreeing with your analysis in 539. i know for a fact that i'm town, so it makes no sense for a scum sobolev to post 475, confirming my slot as town (which is how i interpret that series of events). if you disagree, i'd like to hear your reasoning why on this. i could see how it'd be reasonable to read both sobolev and my slot as scum and see 475 as a play deliberately orchestrated in daychat to confirm this slot, although that thesis should be disproven tomorrow (more on this later).
i also think you're town, although truthfully it's more of just a gut lean. i like your analysis and i think you're questioning things that others just take for granted, so to me i would think that comes from town.
also, i'd like to confirm that there's nothing vote-related invovled with my role. how do you guys suggest i do this?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i already know that there's nothing vote-related currently involved in my role. i'm asking how i should prove it to you guys.
mechanically i should be confirmed town tomorrow - either through being the nightkill or by inheriting the nightkill's abilities. i should make it obvious today that i don't have any vote abilities so that when they manifest themselves tomorrow, everyone can clearly see the distinction.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i guess i should clarify, i didn't write out enough of what was going on inside my head there. presumably you already knew that you couldn't hammer people, so presumably when you made 475 you knew that it would be interpreted by everyone as a hammer. with that in mind, making that play as scum doesn't make sense - if you knew that sheep was town then you would know that he would say something to that effect after he believed that he was hammered. it doesn't make sense as scum to confirm someone as town, so therefore it makes sense that you're town.In post 686, Sobolev Space wrote:
lolIn post 684, northsidegal wrote: so it makes no sense for a scum sobolev to post 475, confirming my slot as town
am i making a mistake anywhere here?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
this is by far the most work-intensive game i've ever been involved with. every other game i've either been there from the start or replaced in having already been following along. this game, i hadn't read that much and rereading was made only worse by the pages-long argument and the fact that two of the most prolific posters have the exact same avatar. i apologize for not giving a read on your slot, but i really don't think i can make any sort of informed opinion. i wouldn't want to fabricate something when i don't have anything just for the sake of having a read, so i'm not going to. for what it's worth your concern ovr my reads seems town-motivated.In post 688, Alisae wrote:Nsg I wasn't really in the ones getting personal moreso I was just trying to stop it.
I feel like you're taking the easy way out with your reads right now :/-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
people have expressed suspicion about that role being in a vote-related game, so even if it does not confirm to you that i'm town it will confirm that i'm not lying about being a universal backup.In post 691, Alisae wrote:Also I don't really care about your role since that's not AI and it never will be except IC.
I feel like that post could come any alignment its not AI
ah, you're correct.In post 693, Sobolev Space wrote:also north wouldn't you inherit the role of today's lynch as opposed to the NK?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
consider that me intentionally attempting the plan that you're suggesting requires nobody noticing exactly what you just noticed.In post 694, Sobolev Space wrote:or are u trying to NK me tonight and get an easy mislynch by "confirming" that you're now a priest-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i don't think that - from an outside perspective, i think it could beIn post 698, beeboy wrote:I actually am really confused on why people are questioning the universal backup claim, like thats a super awful fake claim to make before a flip has happened.
Why do you think your role can only be put in the hands of town?possiblethat it's a scum role, but i would think it'd be unlikey. i would think scum this game would have some kind of "scummy" role that could more actively be used against like secret double voting, choosing to make someone hated the next day phase, being able to freeze someone's vote, gaining some kind of special night action if you hammer, etc.
having scum as a universal backup just in terms of balance would be risky, i'd imagine. i'm not going to try to outguess / play the mod here, though. i never suggested that universal backup could only be town, i'm just saying that i will be confirmed as universal backup. hopefully that being confirmed combined with my play will do enough to clear suspicion on my slot.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
could you elaborate?In post 700, Alisae wrote:Ur play isn't town
in defense of my predecessor, lurking is non-alignment indicative, especially for a chronic lurker like sheep. i don't think it really means anything (well, i know for a fact that it's not a scumtell, but i'm coming at this from other people's perpsectives). if the entire wagon on him came from his active lurking, shouldn't i be given a chance to try to make up for his lack of content?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
well i hope you can at least understand that i've been put in kind of a hard position here.In post 704, Alisae wrote:I don't care about the lurking and I could case him easily without using the word lurk
I think your content could easily come from scum and you haven't really done anything that is flat out townie
i can't entirely explain or excuse sheep's actions so i hope you'll try to approach my slot from a fresh perspective.
i'm not sure. it seems like the kind of role that would come from scum, although i wouldn't base an entire read on that. i haven't really got a chance to interact with her yet and i didn't get a good read from reading the thread or her iso, so i'd say she's null for me right now.PenguinPower wrote:Do you think Sakura is scum?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
okay, i don't really know how to respond to that except to disagree and hope that i can prove you wrong.In post 706, Alisae wrote:My read on you is that you kinda look like you're openwolfing and when it comes to reads you aren't really doing anything that easily stands out from the crowd, you're not trying to progress the gamestate, you're not being town.
of what we know of the roles so far it seems the most likely to me to belong to scum, along with not being able to hammer. despite this, both player's play seems to contradict any sort of obvious scumminess that would come from their roles - i wouldn't expect scum to make it clear that nobody should vote them if it would freeze the votes and i don't think sobolev would do the fake hammer if she were scum.In post 707, PenguinPower wrote:Just curious as to why you called out that role in particular in your "examples of scum roles" when it was the only one that someone here has outed as having. Figured you had a read on the slot.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
part of the reason that i haven't said anything is that i don't know what to say. nobody seems to care at all about what i'm saying. does nobody want to comment on my logic on the fake hammer? my reads? barely anyone has actually responded to what i've said - they've just maintained that they still scumread my slot.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i appreciate you at least responding. do you think that that's what happened in this situation? i think the far more likely explanation is that people are trying to reconcile what happened with their scumreads on me, eschewing typical rules of intuition and occam's razor to maintain the belief that i'm scum. what'sIn post 757, Sobolev Space wrote:the argument that ur cleared by the fake hammer is bad tho. in a game called votefuckery its reasonable for scum to expect that any hammer could be fake and react accordingly.yourcase on me? what was your case on sheep? when you did your catchup you just placed him at the bottom of your readslist without any commentary except that the claim was bad. why did you even make the fake hammer if you were just going to ignore the result anyways? it's confirmation bias - you didn't get the response that you hoped for so you discarded the results. in a typical game i would never make this point becaues it could easily be determined that the hammer was fake, but in this game there was zero indication that you couldn't hammer. yeah, it's not a huge leap to make that there would be someone who couldn't hammer in a game like this, but do you think that's the thought process that went through scum sheep's mind? if so, why? i would be more inclined to think he'd try to play up his towniness in his final moments if he were scum faking.
given the vote freezing limiting the pool of potential lynches and my current reads i'd probably say a simple plan.In post 758, beeboy wrote:
Who do you want to see lynched?In post 756, northsidegal wrote:part of the reason that i haven't said anything is that i don't know what to say. nobody seems to care at all about what i'm saying. does nobody want to comment on my logic on the fake hammer? my reads? barely anyone has actually responded to what i've said - they've just maintained that they still scumread my slot.
Is there anything in particular you that would help you sort Sakura, Ali and I?
i don't understand what the argument against my slot is, i don't understand what the current points against me are and i don't understand what i could possibly do to change anyone's mind. give a readslist maybe? i just want some indication of people's thought processes because people seem to come to conclusions without explaining how they reached that conclusion, despite the process being far more important than the actual result. anyone can pick a random name and give a read - looking into the way that someone thinks and how they arrive to their conclusions will tell you far more about their alignment, but this game i'm having trouble seeing that.
could you do this?In post 704, Alisae wrote:I don't care about the lurking and I could case him easily without using the word lurk-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
sheep quite clearly did not care about this game or did not have the time to put basically any effort into it - i think it makes sense entirely that that would also extend to after he had been hammered. do you think he even had reads at that point in the game to give? i don't know why you would expect a town sheep to suddenly become a lot more interested in the game right after he thought he had been removed from it. his lackadasical atititude makes sense entirely within context, to me. also, you ignored a lot of my questions - i would appreciate if you could respond when you get the chance.In post 762, Sobolev Space wrote:like do u really believe that he thought the hammer was serious? don't u think town!sheep would at least try to offer some final reads or something instead of saying "oh lol i'm town actually"-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
are you talking about 423?
right, and what i'm arguing is that it's entirely obvious that he didn't care about this game or didn't have the time necessary to play it, so what exactly makes his behavior come from scum rather than it being non-alignment indicative? for that matter, what makes his behavior come from scum and not bored townie with a role that doesn't come into play until the next day? for reasons more than just me knowing my own alignment i'm fairly confident that this is sheep's meta.In post 772, beeboy wrote:His reads had 0 depth to them and he had almost no confidence in any of them, kinda just felt like a low confidence sheep of the general conensus
gee, guess that settles it then.In post 774, Alisae wrote:NSG Sheep's reaction and Sobolev Fakehammering is yous not alignment indicative please stop argueing it is ty in advance-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
is that really all you have to say on sheep? what about on me? is it really just what you said in 706?
i'm not going to let you get away with trying to push my lynch on a lazy case when pretty much the entire reason that my wagon is on me in the first place is my slot's apathy. for the person who's said that i'm taking the easy way out with my reads and who's pushed my slot for being noncommital, your readslist really doesn't do anything for me.
VOTE: alisae-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
maybe if you just repeat that you think i'm scum enough times other people will believe it.In post 783, Alisae wrote:Yeah its hard to commit when there are litterally 6 slots not being town.
I think your push on me is what a caught wolf looks like
glgl-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
oh, i thought you were alisae. the point still stands, i guess.In post 790, beeboy wrote:
I am talking about ASP.In post 778, northsidegal wrote:right, and what i'm arguing is that it's entirely obvious that he didn't care about this game or didn't have the time necessary to play it, so what exactly makes his behavior come from scum rather than it being non-alignment indicative? for that matter, what makes his behavior come from scum and not bored townie with a role that doesn't come into play until the next day? for reasons more than just me knowing my own alignment i'm fairly confident that this is sheep's meta.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i mean, compared to a regular game it's a little hard to avoid noticing or having to explain roles like "all of the votes get frozen if i get voted", right?In post 794, beeboy wrote:I like how we have claims out of over half the slots in this game.
Pretty 10/10 MS gameplay.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
it's compulsive, and when i said that i'd get the nightkill it was a mistake. i'm fairly certain that i'll just inherit the first dead person's ability, regardless of alignment and whether it was a lynch or a nightkill. out of the viable lynch options today i think i would prefer alisae, but given that i don't think that's going to happen i'm fine with the asp wagon.In post 812, Maruchan wrote:Questions that I want answered that I bet those who are "TL;DR" won't see, so I'll post out here instead:
northsidegal: In reference to your role do you get to pick when to act as a backup to a person's role, or are you compulsive and will automatically backup whoever we lynch?
northsidegal: Why would you receive the nightkill's abilities but not the daykill's instead?
Alisea, northsidegal, beeboy: Since you guys don't have a vote, and I am the hammer-ing vote, what are your opinions of the ASP wagon, and do you want me to hammer it?
they were two different contexts - the thing with the fake hammer was a whole different argument that i'm not going to go over again, but this was in the context of the universal backup. regardless of the legitimacy of the fake hammer point and regardless of whether or not i was confirmed town, i was conceding the point that proving that i'm a universal backup wouldn't alone confirm me as town. at the time i was saying that you should already be thinking i was confirmed town for a different reason, but when it came to the universal backup point, it wouldn't confirm anyone as696 696 reminds me that she is trying to prove that she isn't lying about her role earlier, and she says that while confirming her role won't confirm her as town bould would confirm she wasn't lying about her role. Why did she even bring up her "won't confirm me as town" if she truly believes she is already confirmed town? Her earlier post regarding explaining her read on sobolev she takes for granted she is confirmed and doesn't explain how she is confirmed, just explains how sobolev's confirming her confirms him as well. Meaning she doesn't think she needs to explain how she is confirmed town because it's just *so obvious*. And yet now she's saying that if we confirm her role it doesn't confirm she's town, but confirm's she isn't lying. why would she says that if we already should be thinking she is confirmed town? The earlier post about sobolev's "lol" seems like the obtuseness towards what he was really laughing at is faked now.townper se, just not as lying.
i agree with you in principle here but for this point specifically i might disagree. if the vote freezing could confirmably be traced back to sakura then i think you would be right, but i'm not entirely sure that's the case here. given the time it would take the mod to announce that votes were frozen i think it could be reasonably explained away by a scum sakura that scum have the ability to pm the mod to freeze the votes, rather than it being a consequence of someone voting sakura. of course, it does come down to a playstyle difference - is sakura the kind of player who, as scum, would be confident in her ability to argue that point? if the answer is no, then you're right - both scum sakura and town sakura would reveal the freezing effect.708 saying that outing that you are a NU as scum wouldn't be likely so even though she thinks the vote-locking mechanic is a mechanic more likely to be scum-power than town-nerf, counters that with "claiming your role hurts town in first post is very not-scummy" which I disagree with. Claiming you have a role that VISIBLY and CAN BE TRACED TO YOU in your first post is a very common thing to do as scum or town. Because if you don't claim it, and you activate later, it gives massive scummy points, and scum will always emulate townplay, and good townplay with a NU role is to claim it. Good townplay-mechanics do not towny-points make. All scum should react to mechanics as if they are town, to avoid scumpoints.
this post has nothing to do with the reaction test - among other things, it's talking more about sheep's play in general.778 keeps trying to peddle the reaction test-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
why not comment on anything that's happened in the last four or so pages instead of commenting about how slow the game is?In post 833, Sakura Hana wrote:I'm just sort of in "whatever" mode.
This game is moving too slowly, and there's less than 4 days until deadline.
I havent liked the content coming from NSG at all.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
are you saying you never do any active scumhunting or give reasons for your reads? i know that that isn't true from what i've read this game but i also don't know how else to interpret what you're saying here.In post 837, Sakura Hana wrote:
Because I dont work that way.In post 836, northsidegal wrote:to clarify, why not say something substantiative instead of the empty comment that you just don't like my content?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
well what i'm saying is that i'm not okay with anyone pushing through my lynch without any real justification other than "i just don't like it". that's what i said to alisae and the same thing applies to you.In post 842, Sakura Hana wrote:No i'm not saying that. Refer to post 838.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
so what happens when you're wrong? do you pick the next name out of a hat and decide that person is scum and needs to be lynched? i'm trying to engage with you here like you complained that i wasn't doing and all i'm doing is talking to a brick wall.In post 845, Sakura Hana wrote:Well i dont really care what you're okay with or not.
All I care is that you're scum and you need to be lynched.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
any response to the part of that post that you removed from your quote?In post 847, Sakura Hana wrote:
Nah, if im wrong i re-evaluate.In post 846, northsidegal wrote:so what happens when you're wrong? do you pick the next name out of a hat and decide that person is scum and needs to be lynched?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
how exactly does the time relate to your willingness to engage with me? also, i wasn't aware that you weren't in tunnel mode before but now apparently you are.In post 850, Sakura Hana wrote:Why would I respond to that?
You already had several game days before to engage with me, and you decide to do it now that im in tunnel mode? well though luck then.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
yeah, i wanted to interact with you to get a read on you. i'm making an effort to do soIn post 853, Sakura Hana wrote:
Wtf is this even supposed to mean.In post 852, northsidegal wrote:how exactly does the time relate to your willingness to engage with me?
The answer's already on my post.
You said you needed to interact with me to get a read on me and made no effort to do so.
And now that im tunneling you, you complain that im being a brick wall.right now. it's not painting the best picture really.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
all of them, including my own.In post 935, Sobolev Space wrote:who are the lazy votes on you, north?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
friends don't let friends (or townreads) get lynched.In post 940, Alisae wrote:
OHIn post 939, northsidegal wrote:
all of them, including my own.In post 935, Sobolev Space wrote:who are the lazy votes on you, north?
MY
GAWD
THAT'S WHAT I SAID!!!!!!!!!!!1
!!!!!1!!!!!!!!1
!!!!!!!!!
11!
!!!!!!
1
WE SHOULD BE FRIENDS <3-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
is asp really that lazy of a wagon? i mean, i want you to notice something - has asp ever once seemed concerned about being lynched? looking through his iso i don't see a single instance of concern that he might die. why is that? i wonder if it could be an asp/maru scumteam, with asp confident that maru wouldn't hammer him. just throwing ideas out there, might be useful to look back on tomorrow. as an example, look at this:In post 942, Sakura Hana wrote:ASP is a lazy wagon
North is a lazy wagon
The only other 3 options are myself, bee and you.
I doubt you want to lynch yourself.
So the other options are myself or bee.
Last i heard you townread me and had a bunch of nulls.
So are you saying that bee is scum? otherwise i dont see this day going the way you want it.
the response to being at l-1 is to simply remind someone of his role - there's no concern at all, no self-defense. penguin even noticed this:In post 805, A Simple Plan wrote:
I'm VOTELESS today, genius. Check my ISO. I demonstrated as such earlier on.In post 799, PenguinPower wrote:An ASP lynch is going to take everyone but ASP, including Maru, due to frozen votes (unless ASP decides to self-vote).
earlier in the game you said that you didn't understand why i was being survivalistic:In post 806, PenguinPower wrote:Um...ok. It's still going to take everyone but you...L-1 guy.
of course i'm being survivalistic - not only was pretty much the only wagon in the game on me, but also i know for a fact that i'm town. town should never accept their own lynch - it's like accepting a lynch on someone you have a cop innocent on. just because my role might not be the best doesn't mean i'm going to accept my own lynch. truthfully, i'd even accept someone i townread's lynch over my own. maybe it's selfish, but there's always the chance that i'm wrong about that person, whereas i know for a fact that i'm town.In post 898, Sakura Hana wrote:As for seeing people being survivalistic as town... Well i dont see any reason for her to be survivalistic, her role seems more NU than you'd think, specially if she inherits something like ASP's or bee's role, or heck even mine or Sobolev's. She waited until I was tunneling her, to start complaining about me being a brick wall, instead of engaging me when i wasnt tunneling, doesnt feel like she ever wanted to sort me, and as a result, im gonna predict that she's gonna scumread me, she's been preparing for it for a while.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
is this passive-aggressive pettiness really necessary?In post 1038, Sakura Hana wrote:Because the almighty god of MLG mafia said so.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
doesn't this instantly make you think to asp? being voteless day one would make sense if he has to "steal" someone else's vote each day, given that there was no night 0. obviously this isn't some undefeatable scumcase, but that's what instantly came to mind.
VOTE: asp
still okay with this.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
ah, something like a roleblocker or "vote blocker". that makes sense.In post 1044, Alisae wrote:Beeboy does your role work in MyLo?
If so I would be totally okay with no lynching at some point.
However I owe the game a reread and would like to get that done first.
pedit: I think using steal is the wrong word.
I meant ot say that I don't have a vote today
someone either stole it or took it away
i'd be okay no lynching but i'd rather we only do it when it's necessary as opposed to right now. delaying the flip just delays the information - i don't see the point to doing it now instead of later.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i'm not sure it's a big enough problem to warrant no lynching, really. as long as we're careful with votes in mylo then scum shouldn't be able to quickhammer.In post 1049, Alisae wrote:If we don't no lynch and beeboy's role works in MyLo we basicly have to pl him because that role is a problem in MyLo.
I rather no lynch to avoid pls-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
why? i thought we just figured out that there won't be any concerns over mylo?In post 1059, Alisae wrote:Yeah no lynching is super preferable for reasons here please do that when I am ready.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
sure! wait for the next votecount.In post 1087, Sobolev Space wrote:wait we can also pretty easily check that north now has penguin's role right?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
In post 1189, Sobolev Space wrote:i mean why should i budge? the argument in favor is that alisae really didn't understand that we had limited lynch options yesterday.
but my entire case today has been "our lynch power was hugely constrained yesterday which explains how i was acting" and i fail to see how alisae reads several pages of me saying this without asking "hmm what constraints on our lynch power is she talking about?" unless e just wanted me to be scum.
and you think that this comes from alisae being scum? do you think that alisae, as scum, thought it was possible to push through a lynch on you on a misrepped point? it doesn't seem likely to me.In post 1192, Sobolev Space wrote:i can even understand alisae missing this in my iso from yesterday but it takes willful disengagement to not understand it through several pages of interaction with me when this is what my entire defense rested on.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
In post 1212, HolySpiritTurtle wrote:Spoiler:-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
yeah, i just did this as a demonstration.In post 1214, Alisae wrote:North honestly you should be voting ASP-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
do you think that it's a big enough deal to warrant freezing gorking's vote?In post 1220, Sakura Hana wrote:ok so we can try to enact my plan now to prevent the auto hammer so then we can vote normally, but for now i require north and NM to stop voting unless they dont care if their votes are frozen where they are.
i'll UNVOTE: anyways.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
aren't you happy we didn't lynch you? like, let's say you're town and alisae is scum. why would alisae intentionally stop the lynch or at least try to prevent it, as you're claiming? i don't think this makes sense.In post 1246, A Simple Plan wrote:Although tbf, I'm gonna have to reread all of d2 so far. Just feel like one of the main reasons we didn't have any lynch D1 was Alisae, coupled with the suvrivalism > town of NSG.
I honestly had to ISO the mod to make sure the new guy wasn't replacing me, because I've been way too checked out the past few days.-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i'm not sure i believe this. you said that one of the main reasons we didn't have a lynch day one was alisae - it doesn't seem to me like whether or not alisae had a vote would make a difference when it comes to this. presumably what alisae said would be far more important than just the action of placing a vote, hence why a playstyle like not mafia's is less influential than someone more verbose's. like, the fact that alisae couldn't vote shouldn't change your assertion that e was one of the main reasons we didn't have a lynch - just the simple act of voting shouldn't be so influential. if we follow your logic then youIn post 1270, A Simple Plan wrote:Okay. Looking back, I seem to have confused some stuff- Alisae's vote was locked ON Sakura, it was not Sakura's vote that was locked. This changes a lot WRT Alisae. Just found it odd that e insisted we avoid a NL, and yet didn't make any votes to push for a lynch as we got closer to deadline.shouldbe saying that not mafia was the main reason we didn't have a lynch yesterday, for not showing up to hammer.
even more, you didn't answer my question. even if we take it that alisae was not themain reasonthat a no lynch happened yesterday, presumably you're still making the point that e had the goal of a no lynch in mind. the thing is, that still doesn't make sense. again, why would alisae as scum attempt to stop the lynch or try to prevent it, if we take it that you're town and alisae is scum?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i'm still not sure i believe you here. if the point you were making when you said that this:In post 1275, A Simple Plan wrote:
Alisae didn't have a vote. I thought e did. E was around after I reached L1 and didn't hammer. I was making the argument that e was giving scum a free NK without any info to town (because who has associative data with Penguin?) when my lynch would've said something about NM, about Maru, and to a lesser extent about SS, Alisae, and NSG. But because I didn't realize e had no vote, any case pushed is invalid. I can't make this argument about NM because NM wasn't around between L-1 and deadline to my knowledge.In post 1273, northsidegal wrote:
i'm not sure i believe this. you said that one of the main reasons we didn't have a lynch day one was alisae - it doesn't seem to me like whether or not alisae had a vote would make a difference when it comes to this. presumably what alisae said would be far more important than just the action of placing a vote, hence why a playstyle like not mafia's is less influential than someone more verbose's. like, the fact that alisae couldn't vote shouldn't change your assertion that e was one of the main reasons we didn't have a lynch - just the simple act of voting shouldn't be so influential. if we follow your logic then youIn post 1270, A Simple Plan wrote:Okay. Looking back, I seem to have confused some stuff- Alisae's vote was locked ON Sakura, it was not Sakura's vote that was locked. This changes a lot WRT Alisae. Just found it odd that e insisted we avoid a NL, and yet didn't make any votes to push for a lynch as we got closer to deadline.shouldbe saying that not mafia was the main reason we didn't have a lynch yesterday, for not showing up to hammer.
even more, you didn't answer my question. even if we take it that alisae was not themain reasonthat a no lynch happened yesterday, presumably you're still making the point that e had the goal of a no lynch in mind. the thing is, that still doesn't make sense. again, why would alisae as scum attempt to stop the lynch or try to prevent it, if we take it that you're town and alisae is scum?
was that it was alisae's not voting that caused the no lynch, i feel like you would have just said that explicitly. like, if you saw that alisae was clearly online, in-thread and posting when it was l-1 and the timer was running down and saw that e didn't hammer, why didn't you question eir on that? like, where was the "hey alisae, why didn't you hammer yesterday? also i'm going to scumread you for not doing that". as it is it seems to me like you're changing your story as issues pop up.In post 1246, A Simple Plan wrote:Although tbf, I'm gonna have to reread all of d2 so far.Just feel like one of the main reasons we didn't have any lynch D1 was Alisae, coupled with the suvrivalism > town of NSG.
I honestly had to ISO the mod to make sure the new guy wasn't replacing me, because I've been way too checked out the past few days.
okay, so when you say "any case pushed is invalid", i presume that you're abandoning your point that alisae was deliberately attempting to get a no-lynch. is that correct?-
-
northsidegal
-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
how much of the game have you read?In post 1298, RadiantCowbells wrote:NSG is never scum. SS I think is town. gorkington I think is town. Alisae I think is town.
so that leaves NM and ASP but I don't think that they're scumbuddies so I'm most likely wrong about someone
-