, and 84 is one of his worst this game, in my opinion.
I don't get how you
'like
' those posts but don't like anything else he's posted? That somehow doesn't feel genuine to me.
78 is a town entrance IMO. I see it as a genuine thought or reaction.
I would expect scum to be just a bit more calculated there.
84 he’s spitting out evaluations of posts I agree with or at least can see the viewpoints
They don’t feel forced to me.
Ok, but the part I'm having trouble believing is that after giving implosion a generous slight townread based on those two posts, you now claim not to have liked anything he's posted since.
it's very telling that mumble grew then all of a sudden he was "lynchbait". Scum could have called him lynch bait. No i don't know for certain his alignment. Lynching a townie scum can EASILY use to manipulate is the next best thing to lynching scum. The odds of him being scum are 1 in 4. If he's scum that gets away with it day 1 he'll get away with it days 2, 3 and 4. Same goes for katherine.
I always try to look at the benefit of mislynching opposed to lynching. If there's an avenue to persue if X player flips town and if theres an avenue to persue if the same player flips scum. Sure we want to lynch scum every time but we simply can't. Plus, there's no concrete evidence he or katherine is town.
seriously people every wagon half the votes are naked votes. That's not good for reading day 1 later on in the game. We shouldn't allow a wagon made up of naked votes.
In post 638, Gamma Emerald wrote:TChill please look past the activity and look at Katehrine's content please, thoughts will be required
Activity isn't AI. It is required to show the rest of the game that you're town though. I'm talking Strong TR. So while the "content" hasn't been scummy I'd like to continue with a group ik is going to play the game. That can be transparently town when i need them to be. I can't trust Katherine or Mumble atm but would love to play with them if they actually decide to participate. (Tone reads only seem to be made when it comes to players with low content. If you can read someone on tone that's great. I can't.)
In post 638, Gamma Emerald wrote:TChill please look past the activity and look at Katehrine's content please, thoughts will be required
Activity isn't AI. It is required to show the rest of the game that you're town though. I'm talking Strong TR. So while the "content" hasn't been scummy I'd like to continue with a group ik is going to play the game. That can be transparently town when i need them to be. I can't trust Katherine or Mumble atm but would love to play with them if they actually decide to participate. (Tone reads only seem to be made when it comes to players with low content. If you can read someone on tone that's great. I can't.)
When Katherine has participated she's been pretty towny imo, that's why I wanted you to read her posts, so that I could try to get you to see that, but you seem to be having more fun discrediting her so u-do-u VOTE: TChill13
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 73, Killthestory wrote:i understand, man, and i'm cognizant of that now that i realize you truly had no idea what you were doing (and i mean that in the nicest way possible) with no ulterior scum agenda. i would like to know still how much experience you have with mafia in general though because from your join date, i thought you'd have a lot more.
VOTE: Mumble
this almost always hits a wolf.
btw iirc mariar has played a game where we were both wolves, but that was a while ago.
So he votes mumble. Nails me as scum after the linked game (DOESN'T change his vote though). Stays on "Scummy" Mumble.
So i'm assuming he feels great about his mumble, Tchill scum reads.
Votes implsion for decent reasoning, i'm not gonna argue with it. Then the naked vote on havo... Looks to me he's making the easiest pushes he can make.
In post 639, Tchill13 wrote:ok so we can agree a wagon is not really a threat until about vote 4 on a 7 to lynch right?
so arguably the most important votes on a wagon are the one's that get the wagon to "real possibility" territory.
Votes 2, 3 and 4 imo. The 1st vote carries very little weight alone.
I'm gonna need a reason for those votes. They look like "throw shit at the wall and hope it sticks" votes. As in you just want someone lynched.
KTS has voted about half the player list at this point When he had Scum!Tchill nailed from the get go, called him town then nailed him again later.
This is one of many oppurtunistic Cedrick moves i've seen and of the players that contributed im closest to voting him
1. why would you ever excuse vote number 1? everyone on a wagon should be scrutinized equally or nobody at all
2. havo didn't have 4 votes on him so I am not even sure why you are rambling on in the first place
3. not a fan of you discrediting everyone voting him like that, you should try to find out the reasons first instead of just blanket shading everyone
4. what is stopping you from voting me? Better yet what do I need to do to push you off that fence you are sitting on?
One thing about life, you going to lose more than you going to win, but are you going to get up?
In post 638, Gamma Emerald wrote:TChill please look past the activity and look at Katehrine's content please, thoughts will be required
Activity isn't AI. It is required to show the rest of the game that you're town though. I'm talking Strong TR. So while the "content" hasn't been scummy I'd like to continue with a group ik is going to play the game. That can be transparently town when i need them to be. I can't trust Katherine or Mumble atm but would love to play with them if they actually decide to participate. (Tone reads only seem to be made when it comes to players with low content. If you can read someone on tone that's great. I can't.)
When Katherine has participated she's been pretty towny imo, that's why I wanted you to read her posts, so that I could try to get you to see that, but you seem to be having more fun discrediting her so u-do-u VOTE: TChill13
discredit? i've done no such thing. I simply disagreed that i'm ok with calling him town based off his content. I read it. It's not good enough for me. Not once did i talk about his actually play in a negative manner. I think it's great you can declare a strong TR on such low content. I can't. Have i definitively called katherine scum? I haven't.
If you want to vote me that's fine. Explain correctly why you're voting me though. I mean if you want to of course. I'm not having any of that BS though.