have pushed a lot of strategies in open games and your reaction is most similar to scum reactions in my experience
Edit: yeah if you take that statement completely out of context and ignore all the posts before and after it detailing my strategy for this unique setup, sure
In post 26, Mathdino wrote:hahahaha
i am completely unsurprised at the newbie listmod's disapproval of this strategy
When I made 26 I figured that was a hipfire reaction, and I would, at some point, get a more detailed explanation on why my strategy was bad.
When it turned into a game of "discredit Mathdino and this strategy is garbage", that's what I mean by scum reactions. Scum is forced to either make shit up to rip into the strategy (which I'm on record outside of this game for approving of), or discredit me and my ability to optimise.
"I just want to play mafia, not Economics Wonderland." - cytheflyguy
When I made 26 I figured that was a hipfire reaction, and I would, at some point, get a more detailed explanation on why my strategy was bad.
When it turned into a game of "discredit Mathdino and this strategy is garbage", that's what I mean by scum reactions. Scum is forced to either make shit up to rip into the strategy (which I'm on record outside of this game for approving of), or discredit me and my ability to optimise.
I'm not trying to discredit you, but I'm also not having this discussion in this game. Happy to participate in that discussion later on, but your claims that you have found an "optimal play" and have "broken the setup" are egotistical and unproven via stats. Once you can back up your arrogance, I'll follow along.
That's the last thing I'm going to say about your strategy for the duration of this game.
In post 187, Bambietta Basterbine wrote:I have no reason NOT to scumread you, so if ya want one of the votes off you, you gotta ask Cheeky or mister Penguin.
This would also be nice to explain given your last "read list" was all scum reads.
Would still like your answer to this.
That was a meme reads list specifically to not give Bambi something to sheep. I was half making fun of what other people get scumread for (Gamma, Smart, NSG) and half making fun of my own gut reactions to people's posts (CT, you).
Bambi and N_M are presently unreadable and are already fully in my lynchpool. If I'm to actually push people for reasons:
NSG is town.
CT reads very light town.
Gamma can nulltown.
Smart is null.
You I lightly scumread.
So if I'm supposed to actually play the game as opposed to policysmiting people I don't wanna play with, my vote's on you.
"I just want to play mafia, not Economics Wonderland." - cytheflyguy
In post 188, PenguinPower wrote:I'm not trying to discredit you, but I'm also not having this discussion in this game. Happy to participate in that discussion later on, but your claims that you have found an "optimal play" and have "broken the setup" are egotistical and unproven via stats. Once you can back up your arrogance, I'll follow along.
That's the last thing I'm going to say about your strategy for the duration of this game.
It's not a hardbreak, it's just an optimisation like the BP claim.
If I can prove it mathematically/computationally assuming random night actions, would that be better?
I can show all my assumptions on scum strategy and run the stats on each of Tracker/Doc, Tracker/JK, and Tracker/Cop.
"I just want to play mafia, not Economics Wonderland." - cytheflyguy
