I can't buy this. The explanation he gave for the town lean was:In post 192, BuJaber wrote:@GL - I'm not expecting him to have a thorough case to be honest and his explanation was enough to put someone from a null to a townlean. I mean I think I'm being clearly townie here but given your and Icon's reactions that doesn't seem to be the case.
I don't see how this is convincing, and even if you accepted it for gut reasons, I don't see a townie legitimately looking to sort someone accepting this with a straight "thanks for the explanation" and dropping their scum read.Setting aside the above meta, I read BuJaber as slight town. From my POV in this game, his content has been generally pro-town.
Nice Not_Mafia impression. If you're actually sorry, you should engage with what's been going on in your absence.
Switching to the next-largest wagon with no explanation when you're at L-1, what an excellent move.
What an obviously posturing question.In post 5, Christopher wrote:Hi. Who’re the goons?
If this hasn't changed through your following posts I say we flash lynch you.
In post 15, Iconeum wrote:In post 5, Christopher wrote:Hi. Who’re the goons?Obvious townslip by Christopher, GL fell for it.
GGEZ
VOTE: GreenLiquid
This dude is town. Clearly game solving.In post 35, GreenLiquid wrote:I guess, but his first post was multiple hours after the day began so it's not as if he could have gone straight from conversation with his partner to the game thread. Feels like a stretch.In post 26, Lovebird wrote:I don't expect him to be bored if he's talking to a scumbuddy beforehand. Though, it could be scoping out the playlist, I guess.In post 24, GreenLiquid wrote: I don't agree with this and it feels kind of LAMIST to me. Can you elaborate on why you think Raskie's answer is towny?
Basically because it doesn't appear very reasonable, and feels like you're trying to be on record townreading someone more than it feels like you are actually sorting Raskie.In post 27, Lovebird wrote:How is that lamist?
No comments on GL's observations? Feels like pocketing town Bu.In post 43, Iconeum wrote:It's a strange conversation to have, but even stranger to drag it out.
I like Buj's observation here.
In post 59, Iconeum wrote:I agree that putting Lovebird in a scumpool, but in the same post mentioning that is has no reason to act like that if scum, is just weird.
Still like how he tries to steer conversation away, because that was leading us nowhere.
Rask town, a lot of effort into trying to keep discussion going/getting it started.
N_M is out of his town meta, where he usually votes his first scumread (very) early, so let's see how that develops.
Lovebird town vibes
ZZZX weak first post
GL early town read, too much effort in discussing townread/NAI with lovebird, doesn't feel like a scum play
Christopher afk
Bujabers contradiction is the most scummy thing so far imo, let's see where that leads us
VOTE: Bujaber
Ico, Chris scum team?In post 70, Christopher wrote:In post 69, Raskolnikov wrote:@Christopher what do you think of the love, me, and GL interactionOn the whole I agree with your 47.In post 47, Raskolnikov wrote:As for lovebird. What she did was definitely pro-town in what it accomplished, but as a tell I think it's complicated. For a newer player I would absolutely townread that because new scum do avoid attention and also aren't even necessarily aware they'd get townread for being pro-town/lamist. OTOH giving lovebird that would be careless, she has some scum games already here with competent level of play and is from offsite before that (not to put paranoia on her either though which would be unfair). That said the thought process itself adds up and 37 is some nuance at least so even if it's "graspy" I don't think it's shallow and don't feel it's scummy.
I think Lovebird's 37 is pro-town, and I kind of respect the hunt. I see where he was going with it, but I read it more of an integration between RvS and day 1 as opposed to a genuine read. It's similar to how I read Bu's opening.
On the substantive anxious/bored vs checking profiles before-or-after the day started, it's NAI for me.
In post 22, Not_Mafia wrote:SupI want to focus on this from Not_Mafia. Even after we were moving on from RvS during the whole love read, Not_Mafia comes in with this? And then follows up with that? Hi Not_Mafia. How are you?In post 25, Not_Mafia wrote:The more things seem to change, the more they stay the same
Town read you and now you make this bad vote :/ I'm hoping it's a reaction test.In post 76, ZZZX wrote:I just feel people trying to talk about people not posting enough or not giving enough content at the 2nd (or 3rd?) day is really... fake
Lets keep it at that
VOTE: Raskolnikov
Fake
...nooo don't make it this hard to sort you. You OMGUS voted then went back to an NM lynch??? In what world does voting NM ever give you content?
How is this guy not at L-1?In post 100, Christopher wrote:tr Greenliquid.
leantown on BuJaber, Iconeum, and Lovebird.
Major's afk, and i'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
tbh, I'm null on ZZZX and Rask.
leanscum on no content Not_Mafia.
I'm pretty sure you'd be fine with anything at this point.In post 152, Christopher wrote:Ya, I'm fine with this wagon. I stand by my reads.
Honestly, BuJaber's opening so far is NAI. FMPOV, it's just his town and scum opening.