Because you just are, okay? Just the tone you took at the beginning and shit. I'm huge when it comes to reading personality over actual evidence. It's why I read Gamma starting to do jackshit as scummy and North just fricken getting fusterated by Dino targeting her as town, since I went through that shit as well when I'm town.
In post 952, Bambietta Basterbine wrote:Because you just are, okay? Just the tone you took at the beginning and shit. I'm huge when it comes to reading personality over actual evidence. It's why I read Gamma starting to do jackshit as scummy and North just fricken getting fusterated by Dino targeting her as town, since I went through that shit as well when I'm town.
How is that read on me personality?
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 952, Bambietta Basterbine wrote:Because you just are, okay? Just the tone you took at the beginning and shit. I'm huge when it comes to reading personality over actual evidence. It's why I read Gamma starting to do jackshit as scummy and North just fricken getting fusterated by Dino targeting her as town, since I went through that shit as well when I'm town.
In post 651, PenguinPower wrote:I don't have a hook to get off. I voted you partially as a counterwagon to nsg (both three votes at the time) to see what might happen and partially because you hadn't answered my question about nm (which you amazingly did 4 minutes after; hence the Beetlejuice gif). I din't like your interactions with nsg, so I'm content where I am.
Hey, where'd that nonexistent hook go?
p-edit
Why is Gamma town?
Knows he's voting as a counterwagon to NSG... I can't see this coming from scum? I'm conflicted, the rest of his ISO is pretty bad. I'll relook at Gamma interactions to see if this argument holds substance.
In post 656, PenguinPower wrote:Sorry, Cheeky, but that was a bunch of buzzwords and nonsense that anyone of any alignment could do. Gamma hasn't really engaged in anything, pushed NM for a weak reason, and his entire exchange with NSG feels fake. Especially putting her to an unannounced L-1 then finding a "reason" for unvoting a short few hours later. I don't see town.
Because past experience with you says you do more shit usually, Gamma. It's why I thought Almost was scum in Tit for Tat and why I'm just frustrated at my own skills currently.
Times like this make me realize how shit at town I am, and how much of a sour mood it puts me in.
--- Post Edit ---
It's what I did before this, but appearantly any toneread I do is shit, so I'm goin purely for evidence now. Didn't have the motivation for a bit when I saw I was at L-1 and Penguin decided to casually mention he'd hammer me after Red gave him a reason.
In post 964, Bambietta Basterbine wrote:Because past experience with you says you do more shit usually, Gamma. It's why I thought Almost was scum in Tit for Tat and why I'm just frustrated at my own skills currently.
Times like this make me realize how shit at town I am, and how much of a sour mood it puts me in.
--- Post Edit ---
It's what I did before this, but appearantly any toneread I do is shit, so I'm goin purely for evidence now. Didn't have the motivation for a bit when I saw I was at L-1 and Penguin decided to casually mention he'd hammer me after Red gave him a
In post 568, Gamma Emerald wrote:
I skimmed this but I got the "NSG's push on you doesn't make sense given meta plus game theory for this setup". I agree quite a bit. VOTE: NSG
Since I might actually have ended up on a vanity wagon when trying to wagon my scumread
how can you possible agree that my push on him doesn't make sense when by your own admission you haven't been reading it?
It's as Math said; if he believes he can read you why would he want you out of the game d1, where if you lose he can't keep you around to read in future games?
It's as Math said; if he believes he can read you why would he want you out of the game d1, where if you lose he can't keep you around to read in future games?
why would
i
want math out of the game when i respect his townplay and feel that i have a pretty good grasp on his scumgame?
Because you respect his town play and would be rather concerned if he were town? And what do you think you know about his scumgame?
In post 597, Gamma Emerald wrote:Because you respect his town play and would be rather concerned if he were town? And what do you think you know about his scumgame?
First of all, the exact same thing applies with regards to mathdino towards me. what's more, what you're describing as my mentality just doesn't make sense for anyone. your chances of rolling town in future games is always more than your chances of rolling scum, so if you were going to play with future games in mind you would always play towards a future towngame over a future scumgame.
i know that he plays politically and i know that he's worse at real-time interaction (something that i think is visible this game).
Why are you scumreading him for something you know that is just a thing he does then (being bad at realtime interaction)? And what is playing politically?
In post 599, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why are you scumreading him for something you know that is just a thing he does then (being bad at realtime interaction)? And what is playing politically?
i'm saying that's what i know if his
scumgame
, that he's worse at realtime interaction as scum than as town.
playing "politically" is fabricating your reads in such a way to try to get rid of players where it hurts you to have them around and keeping around players that benefit you to have them around. an example for mathdino would be keeping newbies around who townread a loud / dominant playstyle and getting rid of the more experienced players who might see through it. something_smart can probably describe this better than i can.
in this game, i think math's "political" play is evident in the way that he backed off of all of his scumreads before me after it was clear that it wasn't working for him.
ok thanks
so you're saying Mathdino is playing politically for this game or future ones?
In post 607, northsidegal wrote:oh, sorry – i misread what you said, i thought you were just talking about future games.
i mean, my lynch is beneficial for him in the sense that someone who's pushing him as scum dies, but i'm not making the argument that he's scum
just because
he's pushing me. i also think you may be slightly misunderstanding the true essence of playing "politically" – in this game i would say it's more manifested itself through his dropped pushes.
Okay, talk with me about those then.
In post 609, Gamma Emerald wrote:UNVOTE: NSG
I think this is probably town discourse, kinda feel like a scum would push me just a little
I don't see it Penguin. The way you've phrased your case on Gamma "voting then quick unvoting" is pretty misreppy considering they had a pretty genuine discussion between the vote/unvote. I don't think NSG would bother talking down her scum buddy.
In post 968, CheekyTeeky wrote:I don't see it Penguin. The way you've phrased your case on Gamma "voting then quick unvoting" is pretty misreppy considering they had a pretty genuine discussion between the vote/unvote. I don't think NSG would bother talking down her scum buddy.
I don't see it Cheeky. The way you've phrased your response to my "case" on Gamma is pretty misreppy considering I explicitly stated that I didn't find the "genuine" discussion to be genuine. I don't even get your second point.
