Whoa, wait. So Flavor has now claimed both MAson AND is confirmed Neighbor?
is this a fakeclaim in terms of jokes or what?
Whoa, wait. So Flavor has now claimed both MAson AND is confirmed Neighbor?
Yes, people who vote only town are scummyIn post 901, Inferno390 wrote:So first off, maybe this is a bit OMGUS, but Mulch's enterance is so scumfrickery that it's stupid. Really aggressive and a lot of just spewing "reads' without opinions. Plus, a lot of what I'm seeing so far for his reason to vote me is bull. By his logic, anyone who consistently is joining wagons on "town" is scummy?
But that makes me scum? What about those who just think that the players that they vote are scummy for the wrong reasons? They're scum because they're opinions are not the same as yours? And what if YOU"RE wrong about your reads? what If I'm right? Are my thoughts and opinions not valid in this situations? And what about the players I'm voting? What makes you so sure that they are town?In post 903, Mulch wrote:Yes, people who vote only town are scummyIn post 901, Inferno390 wrote:So first off, maybe this is a bit OMGUS, but Mulch's enterance is so scumfrickery that it's stupid. Really aggressive and a lot of just spewing "reads' without opinions. Plus, a lot of what I'm seeing so far for his reason to vote me is bull. By his logic, anyone who consistently is joining wagons on "town" is scummy?
Not necesarily, but it makes you more likely you are scum. Those people are town who made mistakes. No, they aren't 100% scum, but because scum are more likely to vote town, it makes them more likely they are scum. It's possible I'm wrong- which is actually the main reason I'm not pushing you right now. Your thoughts are valid, I just think they are wrong, and maybe scum. Northsidegal is in their town meta (I think), Beefster as well, and I forget the third. I'm re-evaluating Beefster now, though.In post 905, Inferno390 wrote:But that makes me scum? What about those who just think that the players that they vote are scummy for the wrong reasons? They're scum because they're opinions are not the same as yours? And what if YOU"RE wrong about your reads? what If I'm right? Are my thoughts and opinions not valid in this situations? And what about the players I'm voting? What makes you so sure that they are town?In post 903, Mulch wrote:Yes, people who vote only town are scummyIn post 901, Inferno390 wrote:So first off, maybe this is a bit OMGUS, but Mulch's enterance is so scumfrickery that it's stupid. Really aggressive and a lot of just spewing "reads' without opinions. Plus, a lot of what I'm seeing so far for his reason to vote me is bull. By his logic, anyone who consistently is joining wagons on "town" is scummy?
Maybe if you took longer than a minute to make them you'd feel more confident about your reads.In post 904, Mulch wrote:Honestly I'm losing confidence in my reads again XD
Maybe i'm just wrong
I'm sometimes just bad, especially when I don't put in full effort
Really, let's just lynch a not-so-amazing player who also COULD be a wolf on day 1, maybe make some wagons, get some info, then move on.
You haven't explained any of your reads, and while I agree on a few I feel safe in saying it's just because of the amount you put out. Saying that you know the scum because they've been voting pure Town onIn post 903, Mulch wrote:Yes, people who vote only town are scummyIn post 901, Inferno390 wrote:So first off, maybe this is a bit OMGUS, but Mulch's enterance is so scumfrickery that it's stupid. Really aggressive and a lot of just spewing "reads' without opinions. Plus, a lot of what I'm seeing so far for his reason to vote me is bull. By his logic, anyone who consistently is joining wagons on "town" is scummy?
I still mostly feel like you're an arrogant Townie, but there is a part of me questioning if you are perhaps a lyncher. It matches up with you getting so close to Emerald (That initial vote on Inferno helps) and the entirety of your reasoning for lynching Nos is that you know him better than everyone else. You aren't really offering other people for us to lynch, and you're saying we should take your lynch first before questioning you because of your reputation.In post 870, Mulch wrote:Yes, I do this all the timeIn post 865, Nictis wrote:So does Mulch usually open up by making friends? It seems like they put some pretty confident claims on what everyone's faction is and then tried to buddy up with Emerald. It's giving me bad vibes.
Like, one minute to ISO nsg and Townlock them, 3 minutes to call out Nos, 3 minutes to ISO and call FL and Beef as Prob. Town and Def. Town, and 1 to lock TwoInAMillion as Town. This doesn't seem like "Just catching up now" to me, it feels prepared in a way.
Probably just paranoia on my part, but most people I know take longer than a minute to read through all of someone's posts, decide what they are, and then actually type out their decision.
It's NAI for me
I'm great scum, but I have great reads as town
Determine my alignment on whether i lynch scum or not.
IMO, Flubber is an OG version of Assemble. Lurky playstyle, doesn't post much, doesn't get too involved and throws out (apparently) random reads now and then. I dislike it, and find it hard to read. TBH it kinda lines up with what I was saying about Firebringer.... I'm not 100% sure how to read Flubber, it's kinda more of a gut thing. I've only played with him once (him town, me scum) and I've read a couple games with him in it. I get vibes. Not exactly my first lynch for today.In post 866, Egg wrote:Archwing can you talk to me about your scum reads on redflavor and Flubber? I don't recall either being called scum so far..
Not a fan of this response. Profii really shouldn't be on the table today. Much more lynch-worthy people.In post 890, Flubbernugget wrote:This doesn't really answer my question. Though yes, profii is worth lynchingIn post 868, Pine wrote:Profii was scummy before the UCV vote, for reasons already stated. A vanity vote on UCV was a lazy excuse to look active and productive.In post 864, Flubbernugget wrote:So, interestingly enough, this was a thing that happened, but I was misrembering LUV's callout.In post 845, Pine wrote:It was sarcastic, implausible, and immediately retracted. Don't get hung up on dumb stuff.In post 842, Flubbernugget wrote:Woah, did we just ignore someone fakelclaim
I still don't understand what facilitated profii slot being scum based on their experience with UCV
Dude. Read the thread, would ya?In post 893, Flubbernugget wrote:Are we saying the whole ascetic Miller thing was a troll claim now?
- Mulch is a pretty arrogant townie. That's how he is.Nictis wrote:I still mostly feel like you're an arrogant Townie, but there is a part of me questioning if you are perhaps a lyncher. It matches up with you getting so close to Emerald (That initial vote on Inferno helps) and the entirety of your reasoning for lynching Nos is that you know him better than everyone else. You aren't really offering other people for us to lynch, and you're saying we should take your lynch first before questioning you because of your reputation.
I'm reading you as working for Town benefit, but your actions also suggest Lyncher to me.
How about this, for someone who doesn't know the community here, explain why Nos is scum instead of just demanding everyone sheep you or saying we will know your alignment by how he flips.
Huh. Didn't realize that it was disallowed here. I guess I'll correct that feeling.In post 911, Archwing wrote:-Is lyncher normal? I thought it wasn't IIRC.
not sure what the subject is hereIn post 896, Mulch wrote:Towny reaction??In post 894, Nosferatu wrote:How's that for VVWIn post 798, Gamma Emerald wrote:If Mulch is with it I'm with it as well. In a past game I'd locked onto both of them being scum, and I feel like Nos is rather similar to his play that game. This feeling has been simmering in me for a while but I never thought to share it because I wanted to see a bit more.In post 759, Mulch wrote:VOTE: nosferstu
Damnit now why did you have to roll scum
I’ve played with nos many times as both alignments and this is their scum game
They’re way too worried about their appearance; they are more invested and too explanatory. They are tonally in their scum meta
VOTE: Nosferatu
Just glancing at this makes me want to lynch Leaf and Mulch. my immediate reaction is: "Leaf is saying this and then is going to team with his scumpartner Mulch to consistently town read each other thoughout the game, thereforebacking up this statemnt to make neither of them lok scum. Lynch now."In post 914, Flavor Leaf wrote:Mulch and I as town often gather around because we think similarly in some ways and we can balance each other out.
We usually go at it if one of us are scum.
Regardless, Mulch and I know that we’re easier to read later in games, so we just town read each other until something comes up where we shouldn’t.
I think your suspicions of flavor are actually pretty validIn post 909, Archwing wrote:IMO, Flubber is an OG version of Assemble. Lurky playstyle, doesn't post much, doesn't get too involved and throws out (apparently) random reads now and then. I dislike it, and find it hard to read. TBH it kinda lines up with what I was saying about Firebringer.... I'm not 100% sure how to read Flubber, it's kinda more of a gut thing. I've only played with him once (him town, me scum) and I've read a couple games with him in it. I get vibes. Not exactly my first lynch for today.In post 866, Egg wrote:Archwing can you talk to me about your scum reads on redflavor and Flubber? I don't recall either being called scum so far..
Redflavor is not being Redflavor. He's quiet, not really scumhunting, not active at all... I don't like it so much. Not the redflavor I'm used to seeing (which isn't much, but I've seen more of Red than I have of flubber).
this feels a bit tonally off, why are you apologizingIn post 913, Archwing wrote:yeh i just checked the wiki, lyncher is explicitly non-normal. sorry friendo!
I can't because he is always the same.