Open 720: NOIR (GAME OVER)
-
-
Mathdino Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14337
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Location: Right Behind You
Vote counter can process nicknames for players, i.e. MD = mutantdevle, CJV = ceejayvinoya, etc.
Last edited by Mathdino on Thu Apr 12, 2018 7:06 am, edited 4 times in total.-
-
Oxy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: March 11, 2018
-
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36877
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
I personally do not like this abbreviation. Especially when I'm in games withIn post 125, Mathdino wrote:MD = mutantdevleMathdino.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
Fumuki Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1687
- Joined: April 2, 2018
Oh Oxy my buddy....In post 121, Oxy wrote:
I agree in theory because if town who claimed scum were always policy lynched,town would stop claiming scum...
so lovely naive...-
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36877
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
You made a single good point here. Have you played mafia before?In post 117, Fumuki wrote:
Uh...I was going to say that RVS shows some good personality traits actually...If you try to float by when scum for example, joking around too much in RVS is a good sign...even though it's just a first step....In post 114, the worst wrote:Can we all take a moment to talk about how great Sando is?! First townrea
Want explanations from Oxy and Quick + something from devle
Drunkposting duckling OUT
Pedit: fumuki sweetie what would you meta read for at this stage
In a side note....
I need to ask again why no one is voting ceejayvinoya based on my theory....
Like...it would be the best lynching option...
Also...why are people actually talking about policy lynching based on flufflying in RVS...that's what is truly anti-town...even if we miraculously hit scum in complete randomness you'll not even gain important info...-
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36877
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
I thought of that too!In post 128, mutantdevle wrote:
I personally do not like this abbreviation. Especially when I'm in games withIn post 125, Mathdino wrote:MD = mutantdevleMathdino.
Ah to be mixed up with such a polarising player.
In other news....devle why did you roll scum?! I like you! So unfair.-
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36877
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
Forgot Not_Mafia was here, sup old buddy?
@Fumuki if you want to be a troll who is actually extremely awesome to have around, keep an eye on this miltank-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
This is what I'm kinda thinking, but on the other hand, I feel like scum are going to try and push them for an easy lynch. I guess it's up to the tracker-vig to decide whether they want the responsibility of handling policy kills. If there is only 1 kill tonight, then I guess it's our job to handle Fumuki tomorrow. If we are going to policy lynch him, it should be day 2. If we let him live after that, then we have to accept that he'll be a LYLO liability. So for now, I don't care for sorting him (unless he actually starts game solving rather than joking with every post).In post 126, Oxy wrote:There is probably a limit on how anti-town a member of town can play before it's simply +ev to lynch them and end the distractions.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
What makes you think I'm scum?In post 131, the worst wrote:In other news....devle why did you roll scum?! I like you! So unfair.I mostly just lurk now.-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Since your here the worst, then could you maybe answer the question I asked you?
In post 120, mutantdevle wrote:
Care to elaborate on this?In post 114, the worst wrote:Can we all take a moment to talk about how great Sando is?! First townreaI mostly just lurk now.-
-
Fumuki Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1687
- Joined: April 2, 2018
Well, I have ongoing games but started playing here...
I'll...but I just hope I'll not need to keep an eye on him for lurking as well...In post 132, the worst wrote:Forgot Not_Mafia was here, sup old buddy?
@Fumuki if you want to be a troll who is actually extremely awesome to have around, keep an eye on this miltank
Uh...I hope we get along worst, you seems to accept those of our kind...and not only that
I agree with worst. It's such a sad thing that what I thought It would turn in a troll buddy has rolled scum...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So imagine that you're scum, and there's people talking about policy lynch because everyone loves to talk about policy lynching scum claims just as I like shitposting.
If you play scum trying to be neutral/get in the crowd, you probably would not be bold to vote them, however, would try to imply that maybe it's not such a bad thing to lynch them. Then afterwards Iconeum gives me the third vote he suddenly starts casting a little shade around those that joked with scumclaims and even puts a list with people that "scumclaimed", saying that although don't want to policy lynch me now, a policy lynch tomorrow seems like a good option...
Not only that, all his other posts are talking about how that's scummy and even tries to reply a obvious shitpost with a serious analyze...
Caught scum. Proceed to lynching/annihilation.
VOTE: mutantdevle-
-
Fumuki Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1687
- Joined: April 2, 2018
-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
That was not a Scum claim by me. That was a reaction test where I wanted to see how Fumuki would react because I actually felt like they very well could have been posting that in the wrong chat and that it wasn't just a joke. I wanted to see how Fumuki would take my comment because as seen in this game, it could have been taken two different ways, and this is intended. Fumiki took it in the way that I was NOT joking. This to me tells me they are riddled with a guilty conscience because they didn't just brush it off.In post 99, mutantdevle wrote:In post 94, Oxy wrote:@mutantdevle Where did Quick claim scum?Spoiler: here
He's joining in the "we aren't supposed to be revealing this" roleplay as scum. This stuff isn't anything worth lynching these 4 over alone imo but it's kinda scummy and will possibly make me view these 4 people's future posts in a harsher light (obviously some more so than other's due to how much of it each person posted).
This was their reaction:
Based on this I see no reason to unvote fumuki.In post 56, Fumuki wrote:
Wasn't it to scumslip, make it a joke and call anyone pointing it out scummy...?In post 54, Korina wrote:
I thought the plan was to bus me, so you guys look townie!In post 53, Quick wrote:
You were not supposed to post that here.In post 44, Fumuki wrote:
wtfIn post 37, Quick wrote:
How fun!In post 27, Fumuki wrote:Hi, Mafia Rolecop here partners...second game as scum counting with my other completed/finished game in this same account...
...who should we annihilate/kill/smash tonight...?
VOTE: Fumuki
why are you voting me Quick...?
That's not how we planned in the chat...
Do any of us even rememberwhatthe plan was?
holy...shit...
wrong chat again...-
-
Fumuki Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1687
- Joined: April 2, 2018
I'll give you some time to say you're joking or I'll be pointing out myself how this really doesn't make any sense and plus that everyone needs to read Korina scum game themselves to see if you're accurate about her being a townlean by RVS behavior.In post 138, Quick wrote:
That was not a Scum claim by me. That was a reaction test where I wanted to see how Fumuki would react because I actually felt like they very well could have been posting that in the wrong chat and that it wasn't just a joke. I wanted to see how Fumuki would take my comment because as seen in this game, it could have been taken two different ways, and this is intended. Fumiki took it in the way that I was NOT joking. This to me tells me they are riddled with a guilty conscience because they didn't just brush it off.In post 99, mutantdevle wrote:In post 94, Oxy wrote:@mutantdevle Where did Quick claim scum?Spoiler: here
He's joining in the "we aren't supposed to be revealing this" roleplay as scum. This stuff isn't anything worth lynching these 4 over alone imo but it's kinda scummy and will possibly make me view these 4 people's future posts in a harsher light (obviously some more so than other's due to how much of it each person posted).
This was their reaction:
Based on this I see no reason to unvote fumuki.In post 56, Fumuki wrote:
Wasn't it to scumslip, make it a joke and call anyone pointing it out scummy...?In post 54, Korina wrote:
I thought the plan was to bus me, so you guys look townie!In post 53, Quick wrote:
You were not supposed to post that here.In post 44, Fumuki wrote:
wtfIn post 37, Quick wrote:
How fun!In post 27, Fumuki wrote:Hi, Mafia Rolecop here partners...second game as scum counting with my other completed/finished game in this same account...
...who should we annihilate/kill/smash tonight...?
VOTE: Fumuki
why are you voting me Quick...?
That's not how we planned in the chat...
Do any of us even rememberwhatthe plan was?
holy...shit...
wrong chat again...-
-
Fumuki Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1687
- Joined: April 2, 2018
-
-
Korina TheyRecruiterThey
- Recruiter
- Recruiter
- Posts: 6603
- Joined: February 12, 2018
- Pronoun: They
- Location: Oclax
In post 139, Fumuki wrote: I'll give you some time to say you're joking or I'll be pointing out myself how this really doesn't make any sense and plus that everyone needs to read Korina scum game themselves to see if you're accurate aboutherbeing a townlean by RVS behavior.Spoiler: Please read the attached quote
@Mod Do mafia have daychat?
To me it seems like Quick knows or is implying to know that mafia have a daychat, but that could be me.
Also, Quick, care to explain what you mean by Fumuki having a guilty consensus? I don't see it.GTKAS:The most recent one and the only one that actually matters. | ROOMS HAVE AIR ~ Who | Not_Mafia did not submit a naive cop action. big mistake there tbh ~ xyzzy
I dissociate, any signed posts are from my headmates. Refer to GTKAS, or DM me for more information.
#CultsArentBastard| Plurality Discussion Thread-
-
Korina TheyRecruiterThey
- Recruiter
- Recruiter
- Posts: 6603
- Joined: February 12, 2018
- Pronoun: They
- Location: Oclax
Also, the attached quotes have nothing to do with Quick seeming to know Mafia have a daychat, I just realized that.
138 is the post that is suggesting that to me.GTKAS:The most recent one and the only one that actually matters. | ROOMS HAVE AIR ~ Who | Not_Mafia did not submit a naive cop action. big mistake there tbh ~ xyzzy
I dissociate, any signed posts are from my headmates. Refer to GTKAS, or DM me for more information.
#CultsArentBastard| Plurality Discussion Thread-
-
Mathdino Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14337
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Location: Right Behind You
-
-
Korina TheyRecruiterThey
- Recruiter
- Recruiter
- Posts: 6603
- Joined: February 12, 2018
- Pronoun: They
- Location: Oclax
Fixed, because I was mobile posting while making that post.Korina wrote:Also, the attached quotes have nothing to do with Quick seeming to know Mafia have a daychat, I just realized that.
138 is the post that is suggesting that to me:In post 138, Quick wrote: That was not a Scum claim by me. That was a reaction test where I wanted to see how Fumuki would react becauseI actually felt like they very well could have been posting that in the wrong chat and that it wasn't just a joke. I wanted to see how Fumuki would take my comment because as seen in this game, it could have been taken two different ways, and this is intended. Fumiki took it in the way that I was NOT joking. This to me tells me they are riddled with a guilty conscience because they didn't just brush it off.
P-Edit: Oh, nvm, I'm an idiot then. I missed that.
VOTE: QuickGTKAS:The most recent one and the only one that actually matters. | ROOMS HAVE AIR ~ Who | Not_Mafia did not submit a naive cop action. big mistake there tbh ~ xyzzy
I dissociate, any signed posts are from my headmates. Refer to GTKAS, or DM me for more information.
#CultsArentBastard| Plurality Discussion Thread-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Why are you voting me?In post 144, Korina wrote:
Fixed, because I was mobile posting while making that post.Korina wrote:Also, the attached quotes have nothing to do with Quick seeming to know Mafia have a daychat, I just realized that.
138 is the post that is suggesting that to me:In post 138, Quick wrote: That was not a Scum claim by me. That was a reaction test where I wanted to see how Fumuki would react becauseI actually felt like they very well could have been posting that in the wrong chat and that it wasn't just a joke. I wanted to see how Fumuki would take my comment because as seen in this game, it could have been taken two different ways, and this is intended. Fumiki took it in the way that I was NOT joking. This to me tells me they are riddled with a guilty conscience because they didn't just brush it off.
P-Edit: Oh, nvm, I'm an idiot then. I missed that.
VOTE: Quick-
-
Korina TheyRecruiterThey
- Recruiter
- Recruiter
- Posts: 6603
- Joined: February 12, 2018
- Pronoun: They
- Location: Oclax
Few reasons:
1) It seems like you were implying that you knew mafia had daychat, which isn’t true, but it still feels like a really awkward post tome.
2) The bolded part makes no sense in the context of mafia having no daychat, which brings up more questions, (namely the meaning behing the push)
3) The entire post just feels off to me.GTKAS:The most recent one and the only one that actually matters. | ROOMS HAVE AIR ~ Who | Not_Mafia did not submit a naive cop action. big mistake there tbh ~ xyzzy
I dissociate, any signed posts are from my headmates. Refer to GTKAS, or DM me for more information.
#CultsArentBastard| Plurality Discussion Thread-
-
Quick Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5781
- Joined: October 11, 2017
Two of these reasons are the same. To address those, I will say if I implied I thought Mafia had day chat (which isn't necessarily what I am implying because Fumuki could still be posting what they posted as Scum who themselves doesn't know Scum don't have day chat) why would this mean I am Scum? It seemed like you were trying to figure out if I slipped that Scum had Day Chat or not. Once it was revealed I didn't slip that, you STILL voted me. That doesn't make sense. But I guess that makes you Town for not knowing whether Scum had day chat or not.In post 146, Korina wrote:Few reasons:
1) It seems like you were implying that you knew mafia had daychat, which isn’t true, but it still feels like a really awkward post tome.
2) The bolded part makes no sense in the context of mafia having no daychat, which brings up more questions, (namely the meaning behing the push)
3) The entire post just feels off to me.-
-
Korina TheyRecruiterThey
- Recruiter
- Recruiter
- Posts: 6603
- Joined: February 12, 2018
- Pronoun: They
- Location: Oclax
The reason why I voted you after it got confirmed was my second reason.
The bolded part feelsreallyweird and just doesn’t make sense in its context.
I also like it when my question gets ignored.
What do you mean by the bolded part?GTKAS:The most recent one and the only one that actually matters. | ROOMS HAVE AIR ~ Who | Not_Mafia did not submit a naive cop action. big mistake there tbh ~ xyzzy
I dissociate, any signed posts are from my headmates. Refer to GTKAS, or DM me for more information.
#CultsArentBastard| Plurality Discussion Thread-
-
mutantdevle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3731
- Joined: October 21, 2017
- Location: Hell
Nice miss repping here.In post 136, Fumuki wrote:So imagine that you're scum, and there's people talking about policy lynch because everyone loves to talk about policy lynching scum claims just as I like shitposting.
If you play scum trying to be neutral/get in the crowd, you probably would not be bold to vote them, however, would try to imply that maybe it's not such a bad thing to lynch them. Then afterwards Iconeum gives me the third vote he suddenly starts casting a little shade around those that joked with scumclaims and even puts a list with people that "scumclaimed", saying that although don't want to policy lynch me now, a policy lynch tomorrow seems like a good option...
Not only that, all his other posts are talking about how that's scummy and even tries to reply a obvious shitpost with a serious analyze...
Caught scum. Proceed to lynching/annihilation.
My talk of policy lynching you hasnothingto do with your RVS scum claim. The talk around policy lynching you was about how almost every post you write is a shitpost. You can't honestly expect to write a load of crap as your posts and expect people not to consider lynching you for it?
If we are going to policy lynch you, and I never said we definitely should, it's fundamentally a better idea to lynch you day 2 if that's what we want to do. We shouldn't lynch you day 1 because we don't know whether the vig or tracker exists yet. If a vig does exist, it is in their best interest to eliminate the misslynches instead of trying to pick off their own scum reads. Fun fact, as a shit poster, scum are going to try and push your lynch. That makes you mislynchable (assuming you are town) - that's another reason why we probably shouldn't policy lynch you day 1.
Once night 2 has passed, we will know if we have a vig. The vig doesn't necessarily have to kill you night 1, because just the security of having a vig lets us know that we can have you removed from the game if you become too much of a liability. However, if we don't have a vig, then if we are ever going to lynch you during this game, it will have to be day 2. Again, we don't have to lynch you then, but if we ever want you dead during the game, that's when we have to do it. Any later than that and it will be too risky policy lynching instead of scum lynching (unless, of course, we have 1 or 2 scum nailed by then).
I replied to your shit post in an analytical way because I began to think it was serious. You asked people to look at it twice since making the post so it kinda looked like you genuinely wanted us to check it out. It would help if your shitposts were funny and not just random nonsense. As the worst said, if you want to shitpost, pay attention to how Not_Mafia does it. He is genuinely entertaining but still able to take the game seriously. Sometimes he can also be a lylo liability and worthy of a policy lynch but other times he can be a great addition to the town - I've seen him in both situations.I mostly just lurk now.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.