So your telling you made an outrageous, complete!y unfounded claim about your wagon and didn't even bother to check it up, despite the fact that you were literally AtPing 6 people at once with the claim?In post 1499, TwoInAMillion wrote:I'm sorry how did I "lie" except for the lynch rules? Thats not a lie I did not know.
You're being rediculous. When I said everyone on my wagon was scum I wasn't being literal. But I do tend to get scum votes on me on day 1 though.In post 1500, Inferno390 wrote:So your telling you made an outrageous, complete!y unfounded claim about your wagon and didn't even bother to check it up, despite the fact that you were literally AtPing 6 people at once with the claim?In post 1499, TwoInAMillion wrote:I'm sorry how did I "lie" except for the lynch rules? Thats not a lie I did not know.
Bullshit. You're flailing like the scum you are.
Or at the very least, wouldn’t be so obvious about hard defending him.In post 1502, Flavor Leaf wrote:if Two and I were scum buddies, I absolutely wouldn’t be defending him.
I’d bus the hell out of him here.
It's not calling them unintelligent though. The instant you tried to say it was equivalent was the moment you lost the argument.In post 1477, Ausuka wrote:In post 983, Gamma Emerald wrote:wow you're terribleIn post 974, Flavor Leaf wrote:I think two’s town.i mean, yeah, you did. it's not on the wrong side of the "attack the play, not the player" rule but it directly implies that these players are terrible and bad and shouldn't be listened to.
We’re actually masons but sure you can be a pseudo masonIn post 1507, Ausuka wrote:can I join the masonry?
How about the fact I called a scum out CORRECTLY on pretty much the same shit in another game? I was kinda after a dude, they attacked my skills like twice in succession and I went "hell no this is discrediting me".In post 1481, Ausuka wrote:Well, yeah. I'm trying to say that Gamma seeing the kind of behaviours he's displayed in this game as scummy makes more sense from gamma!scum than gamma!town, because if he does it as town he would think it's towny or NAI, but if he does it as scum it makes sense that he would think of it as scummy.In post 1479, Mulch wrote:I don’t think it’s that bad :pIn post 1477, Ausuka wrote:In post 983, Gamma Emerald wrote:wow you're terribleIn post 974, Flavor Leaf wrote:I think two’s town.i mean, yeah, you did. it's not on the wrong side of the "attack the play, not the player" rule but it directly implies that these players are terrible and bad and shouldn't be listened to.
how is it not famIn post 1505, Gamma Emerald wrote:It's not calling them unintelligent though. The instant you tried to say it was equivalent was the moment you lost the argument.In post 1477, Ausuka wrote:In post 983, Gamma Emerald wrote:wow you're terribleIn post 974, Flavor Leaf wrote:I think two’s town.i mean, yeah, you did. it's not on the wrong side of the "attack the play, not the player" rule but it directly implies that these players are terrible and bad and shouldn't be listened to.
what the fuck howIn post 1495, Mulch wrote:ScummyIn post 1494, Inferno390 wrote:Fine.
But when TIAM ends up being red, no one's allowed to say I'm bad at mafia ever again.
no he's not otherwise he wouldn't be here. also I'm gonna go check something outIn post 1514, Nosferatu wrote:are you 12? go back to tunneling town.
I started doing stuff.In post 1511, Egg wrote:This is me reminding myself I have to read up from page 49. This is also me not getting prodded.
In the meantime what did I miss?
Yes. This.In post 1506, Mulch wrote:Flavor leaf is 100% confirmed town and twoinamillion is 100% confirmed town.
Hard claim 3 person masonry
