if i'm not lurking then just call me town. also, if you're annoyed at the way i'm typing or what i'm saying or you think any of it is scummy then blame it on me being v/la and not being able to do things normally.
also, i think when it's appropriate i condense things into a single post.
817 is an example. sometimes things are posted right after i post and so that necessitates another post of mine, like my
819 (although granted, i'm not sure i could call this "necessitated").
occasionally i will admit to getting p-edited by something and just not reading it and making my post anyways, then responding to it afterwards. i don't feel like that significantly affects my post count, though?
In post 826, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 817, northsidegal wrote:???
has there ever been a situation where you've emulated your catch-up style and you have announced it? like, i would assume you'd only be "emulating" your style as scum, so i'm not sure why you would announce it in those situations?
what "recent developments" are you talking about?
also, lol at "trying" to come up with a case on me.
I can't address this in full now, but yes there are situations where I've announced I've tried to emulate my catch-up meta.
As for recent developments that is me having actually good towngames that I can look to and try to incorporate aspects of into my games.
And w/e nice to see you picking at my wording
could you link me to those times? i can't possibly imagine why you would do that.
i don't understand how these "recent developments" factor into your read on me at all. like, supposedly there's some aspect of
your
meta that's changed: in what way does that relate to my push on you and how it affects
my
alignment?
there are valid cases to say that someone is nitpicking, but this isn't one of them. i can only respond to the things you say - i can't read your mind. so, when you say that you're "trying" to come up with a case on me, what i hear is that you're starting without reasons that i'm scum and going off and
looking for them
.