In post 1303, BlackVoid wrote: In post 1301, BuJaber wrote:I don't agree with you that cheeky is coming off as genuine. It feels like she has an agenda and a strategy.
You really think scum would get so pissed off that they'd tell me not to join games with them just because I caught them? It'd be different if someone was being objectively toxic but I don't think I said anything at all that crossed the line. I just tried to lynch her.
Honestly I missed that point. But no I'm pretty sure I've seen scum saying that. Was in a game where an SK vs scum went all out in an argument and it pretty much descended into insults and I doubt either of them would play with the other again.
I am not saying cheeky is like that I have no idea what her meta is but there are definitely scum that use the "don't play with me" line.
This is especially true if you are scum and you are trying to imitate your town game. It feels frustrating when you get caught because in your mind you played just like you do as town so it sort of feels like you will be mislynched if you ever play with the same people again and you roll town.
Anyway regarding GL part of why I never townread him except recently by PoE .. is because he is very active with reads but doesn't seem very active with votes and actually trying to get the lynch.
His posts do read like town unsure of himself but he is very non committal to his reads to the point it comes off as scummy.
The vote on ank is the first time all game where I felt that his vote is actually going to get someone lynched.
But he doesn't work as a partner with cheeky I feel.
So I guess if we lynch ank and she's scum then lynch love and she flips town then at lylo I'll have to decide whether I trust your read on cheeky more than mine or not.
