2) Uses the fact that Sando asked someone else for their scumread on Ico to accuse Sando of scumminessIn post 1595, Alonzo wrote:@quick Why Sando?
3) Sando points out the hypocrisy of 1 and 2In post 1645, Alonzo wrote:Now questioning why someone else wants to SR me.. looking for a way in..
(This is poorly formatted, but it'll do)In post 1648, Sando wrote:d) These are hilarious together:
In post 1645, Alonzo wrote:
Now questioning why someone else wants to SR me.. looking for a way in..
In post 1595, Alonzo wrote:
@quick Why Sando?
4) Alonzo claims his (1) was in fact a reaction test on Quick
5) When pressed on what he thinks of Quicks reaction he kicks the can down the road and says "quick hasn't posted his full wall"In post 1652, Alonzo wrote:A little reaction test on Quick to make sure hes not shitposting.
6) Asks quick to actually post his wall, so he's now giving up on actually wanting to see your reaction and is now just saying "this is what you need to do"In post 1664, Alonzo wrote:@Sando If quicks cooking up a wall quicks cooking up a wall, i dunno what hes gonna say yet.
But I do believe he can probably make a case against you , so I take him at his word that he will. Then when it gets here it will go through scrutineering just like any and all other posts.
& 7) Pre-empts even that reaction with "you can be townbloc"[/quote]
7 in boldIn post 1682, Alonzo wrote:In fact Quick , I dont want that list now, save it, keep it 24 hours, read it again. Take all the salty shit out from Sandos needling, then post it.
And you can be in my townblock.
&
In post 1685, Alonzo wrote:your case on sando.