In post 74, GuiltyLion wrote:I don't really feel strongly about anything yet. I've liked RC's posts. I'm slightly more comfortable townreading NSG than Cheeky here because I don't know if scum!NSG would suggest she's townreading me off of one post, but I don't feel either has done anything particularly AI overall
In post 65, northsidegal wrote:{nsg}
{ceejayvinoya, GuiltyLion}
{shaddowez, RadiantCowbells, the worst}
{CheekyTeeky, Invisibility, Hiraki}
Why is ceejayvinoya so high? I feel like you're being conf biased and have too much mislynch bait in your scum pool
This is a really strange post imo
Disagree
Do not get the Invisibility scumreads.
Only real TR I have is on the worst. Null on NSG, Cheeky and RC. Ceejay is a solid townlean that can be pushed over to town within the next 5 pages. No read on invisibility. Don't even remember reading his posts.
In post 208, northsidegal wrote:Do you think someone whose posts you don't remember at all is less likely to be scum than someone whose posts you find null?
Not really. Just means they haven't said anything interesting.
In post 208, northsidegal wrote:Do you think someone whose posts you don't remember at all is less likely to be scum than someone whose posts you find null?
Not really. Just means they haven't said anything interesting.
I'm just wondering why you don't get how nonmemorable posts could be a reason to scumread someone - it seems perfectly legitimate as a reason to me.
In post 211, northsidegal wrote:Also, hiraki, if you're pointing out some kind of contradiction in the beginning of that post there, i'm not really seeing what you're saying.
It looks like you're going to dig there and then you just for a different hole. Doesn't really click well with me.
In post 208, northsidegal wrote:Do you think someone whose posts you don't remember at all is less likely to be scum than someone whose posts you find null?
Not really. Just means they haven't said anything interesting.
I'm just wondering why you don't get how nonmemorable posts could be a reason to scumread someone - it seems perfectly legitimate as a reason to me.
I know you're being honest here so I don't scumread you for this although I think it's a fake tell. Not really wanting to go into this discussion in a game that has 4 day deadlines - which to be honest would be the sole reason to vindicate your tell.
I'm currently pinging on GL - Something about his tone is bothering me here. His comment in 73 has me on edge, and then the soft recommendation to vote on vig kills feels like he's trying to fish. With only 5 posts I'm not confident enough for a vote, though.
I will do this though - VOTE: the worst
Fluff posts and an empty vote so far. Not cool, not cool
Actually, I really hate this post in hindsight - let's start here.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}