In post 39, Morg wrote:Just how newbie are you guys really? I just registered a few days ago and it's my first game on the site. I don't have any idea how things work here. It's really hard to get reads with so little info to go on.
About the claiming on D1 issue - I can tell how it's a bad idea because it lets scum shortlist people and it makes it easier for them so claiming unless you absolutely have to is out of the question.
But what are the chances to verify if that claiming is a true or or a fake one? The chances of having a cop in the game is 4/9.
I'm pretty new, played two games on another forum and a few in real life.
I read quite a few completed games while i was waiting to be put in game though, so i'd say i got a fairly good grasp of how things work around here. At least the basic stuff.. but actually playing in a game must be totally different so we'll see how it goes
In post 53, Nexus wrote:because getting to third on an RVS wagon is pretty sus.
I don't think that's all that susp. After all it is more productive than for example everyone having one vote on them which generates no pressure whatsoever
Yeah, I'm starting to think that Marshmallow is scum trying to figure out the site meta. This whole IIOA exchange feels really off, and there's problems with both the natural progression and the logic.
In post 53, Nexus wrote:because getting to third on an RVS wagon is pretty sus.
I dunno, I've seen several wagons in RVS before like this, and they end up being pretty NAI IMO. I mean, it's not een possible for scum to take advantage of because 1) it's suicide and 2) Both scum have to be on the wagon, which menas (obviously) that Morg can't be scum from it. [which is not saying Morg is not scum, it's just saying that the logic doesn't work out.] So by that, the third of an RVS wagon isn't scummy becuase it gives no real indication on whether he's scum due to setup and such.
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
In post 51, Nexus wrote:Were you wanting to carry on the wagon
fam
?
Tempted to policy lynch this
but VOTE: Morg
Super srs vote
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
In post 51, Nexus wrote:Were you wanting to carry on the wagon
fam
?
Tempted to policy lynch this
but VOTE: Morg
Super srs vote
Your first reasoning for voting me was 'foretold" and now you are giving me another 'super srs vote" lol
I guess the point of an RVS is throwing shit to the wall and seeing what sticks. I would have let it go if you hadn't written "foretold". I would assume you chose me because I joined late to the game thread but as I said I was having a problem with the bug but clearly you seem to have other reasons. Anyways, that's my justification for this "super srs vote".
Actually now that I think about it, he hasn't really given me any reasoning why he chose me and everything is just my assumption. What's more interesting is Nexus complaining about this wagon and voting for me even tho I addressed his points.
Just so you know, N_M is a troll player at heart. What you're seeing is very much in his meta.
Be wary of lolhammers from his slot.
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
It was a bug that didn't let me post in this thread for quite sometime. Then I had to approach the admin for it.
********************************************************
Also VOTE: Not_Mafia
what do you mean by fortold?
Were you wanting to carry on the wagon fam?
The wagon? Which one? Anything from past games...? To answer the next post, jumping at 3 votes on RVS is not that susp... I don't think Mafia would try to scapegoat someone to get him lynched on RVS, it's stupid. And I don't think either Mafia would get super hard voted. It's more NAI.
Norweegian:
I'm changing your name to Marshal Zhukov after watching that video.
In post 62, Inferno390 wrote:Yeah, I'm starting to think that Marshmallow is scum trying to figure out the site meta. This whole IIOA exchange feels really off, and there's problems with both the natural progression and the logic.
In post 53, Nexus wrote:because getting to third on an RVS wagon is pretty sus.
I dunno, I've seen several wagons in RVS before like this, and they end up being pretty NAI IMO. I mean, it's not een possible for scum to take advantage of because 1) it's suicide and 2) Both scum have to be on the wagon, which menas (obviously) that Morg can't be scum from it. [which is not saying Morg is not scum, it's just saying that the logic doesn't work out.] So by that, the third of an RVS wagon isn't scummy becuase it gives no real indication on whether he's scum due to setup and such.
Then you're calling my brain illogic I gave you my train of thoughts.
100% agreed on that.
Norweegian:
I'm changing your name to Marshal Zhukov after watching that video.
In post 51, Nexus wrote:Were you wanting to carry on the wagon
fam
?
Tempted to policy lynch this
but VOTE: Morg
Super srs vote
Your first reasoning for voting me was 'foretold" and now you are giving me another 'super srs vote" lol
I guess the point of an RVS is throwing shit to the wall and seeing what sticks. I would have let it go if you hadn't written "foretold". I would assume you chose me because I joined late to the game thread but as I said I was having a problem with the bug but clearly you seem to have other reasons. Anyways, that's my justification for this "super srs vote".
Actually now that I think about it, he hasn't really given me any reasoning why he chose me and everything is just my assumption. What's more interesting is Nexus complaining about this wagon and voting for me even tho I addressed his points.
Nexus, I have similar concerns. Why does it bother you so much?
Norweegian:
I'm changing your name to Marshal Zhukov after watching that video.
Srs vote. Tone feels off in the last couple of posts, and the IIOA thing still stands as highly odd.
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
Srs vote. Tone feels off in the last couple of posts, and the IIOA thing still stands as highly odd.
And you were talking about ending RVS. Well, there you go. VOTE: Inferno390 RVS is over, you destroyed it. You are tunneling me, and voting me with seriousness. If we had just restarted voting people who didn't post much, RVS could've been much more useful (and long).
Norweegian:
I'm changing your name to Marshal Zhukov after watching that video.
Srs vote. Tone feels off in the last couple of posts, and the IIOA thing still stands as highly odd.
Plus, you're stating things as facts. But you are not explaining. This probably has a fancy name, but I'll just call it statements instead of thoughts. Because it is impossible to defend against the stated idea "you are scummy".
Norweegian:
I'm changing your name to Marshal Zhukov after watching that video.
Srs vote. Tone feels off in the last couple of posts, and the IIOA thing still stands as highly odd.
And you were talking about ending RVS. Well, there you go. VOTE: Inferno390 RVS is over, you destroyed it. You are tunneling me, and voting me with seriousness. If we had just restarted voting people who didn't post much, RVS could've been much more useful (and long).
Srs vote. Tone feels off in the last couple of posts, and the IIOA thing still stands as highly odd.
Plus, you're stating things as facts. But you are not explaining. This probably has a fancy name, but I'll just call it statements instead of thoughts. Because it is impossible to defend against the stated idea "you are scummy".
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
Norweegian:I'm changing your name to Marshal Zhukov after watching that video.
I gave you my train of thoughts.