Mini Theme 2007: Police Academy 1 - Game Over

Stop Getting Banned Again · Post Post #1075 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 4:25 pm

In post 1074, Gorkington wrote:its bedtime actually
so
fight me and ill fight back tomorrow

or vote for porkens!
thats probably an even better option tbh!

I'll take a look at it over the next hour or so.

~tn5421

Stop Getting Banned Again · Post Post #1076 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 5:27 pm

Spoiler: Quotebin that contains Porkens full iso to date

In post 12, Porkens wrote:Dun dun dun dun
Dun dun
Dun dun dun Sichuan

Sweep the tucking leg I love this movie

In post 13, Porkens wrote:Who's in to policy lynch the stupid megahydra?

VOTE: stopgettingbannedagain

In post 304, Porkens wrote:
In post 93, Jingle wrote:
In post 68, PenguinPower wrote:But, I need an answer to my rainbow read penchant before I give a town read to the hydra.
Nah, that's N_M.

He always enters games like that. It's cause he's a Jester.

Who, if you actually read any of this game you should sign like we did for All is Who. I'd also like Creature to distinguish his posts somehow separately from the rest of you cause I'm told he's a borderline trust tell.

If you promise me those two things I'll stay off your policy lynch.

Mulch, go ahead and prove yourself to be town, and then when you've finished could you do me a favor and keep D1 somewhat readable? I may have accidentally caused ETL to join this clusterfuck and I'd like to minimize the pain there.

This is a scummy post

In post 305, Porkens wrote:Page 5: yeah instead we should all investigate the megahydra
VOTE: unvote

In post 306, Porkens wrote:
In post 163, CheekyTeeky wrote:VOTE: Gorkington

Hey let's kill the hydra before pg 10 btw.
What is this post?

How do you jump on fork here?

In post 307, Porkens wrote:
In post 196, Jingle wrote:
In post 186, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:I'm pretty sure my sign will be compromised very soon, but here's the plan guys.

- Lynch someone D1 (hopefully Mafia!)
- Everyone target the SAME target
- Lynch the said target D2 for sanity checking.

- weeb
Wrong. Target obvtown, that way scum is disincentivized from shooting them but they can be reasonably be assumed to be town anyway, at least D1. That way scum is forced to help us if they want to get rid of the unlynchable slot. Otherwise, you get to be a good boy.
Still scummy

In post 308, Porkens wrote:
In post 206, CheekyTeeky wrote:I can't play like this Town or not they gtg.

VOTE: SGBA
Ew

In post 309, Porkens wrote:
In post 209, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:
ok so we will be the obligatory sanity-checking sacrifice

everyone target us tonight and then lynch us D2 to know your sanity
Yeahp

This good plan.

In post 310, Porkens wrote:
In post 244, CheekyTeeky wrote:Go die. I'm literally thinking about replacing out because of your shit posting I don't want to read. Stfu or die.
Yeah this is scum

In post 311, Porkens wrote:
In post 263, Jingle wrote:I don't want to flip you D2.

I'm told the creature thing is basically trust tell levels of sheepable. AND that his reads are solid but charisma is shit. I want to make scum kill you. The PL aspect of your hydra goes way down once the memers get their collective fill.

Besides, we're not going to get a huge amount of information from one night and one flip. It's more important to narrow people down into the groups than to worry about actually figuring out sanities D1 and D2, so that we can determine if we have a pool of conftown.

VOTE: jingle

In post 312, Porkens wrote:
In post 294, Punreader wrote:
In post 7, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:fuck yeah we claim doctor
I think arrest of the players can tell this is town. If need be, I can Retrieve my data on why I hold this opinion.

In post 28, PenguinPower wrote:Yea, but...I'm policy lynching...uh....
Power to you, my friend. I believe you have no place in a penitentiary.

In post 72, Jingle wrote:Mulch please be scum. Please.
I'd say your ping is possibly true, but it's a bit early to say for sure. Tentatively, I want to say you ring the right bells.

In post 41, Almost50 wrote:
In post 13, Porkens wrote:Who's in to policy lynch the stupid megahydra?
VOTE: stopgettingbannedagain
I Korina doesn't behave I might seriously consider it.
For now I wanna say hello to VOTE: Ginngie cuz we didn't get to talk much in the "Worst Game Ever"
I'd say you're nearly a townread. I sure hope you don't plead the 50th.

In post 40, Mulch wrote:I'm actually a paranoid cop btw
This is a pile of garbage I'm not sorting through right now.

In post 13, Porkens wrote:Who's in to policy lynch the stupid megahydra?
VOTE: stopgettingbannedagain
I take beef with this post, but I admit I might be a little heavy-hamded in my read there.

In post 18, schadd_ wrote:back of the napkin if you get two different checks on two different people it's 75% they're different alignments
VOTE: stop getting banned again
A little bit of a schaddy entrance.

In post 17, Gorkington wrote:
In post 15, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:we'll vig you porkens
counterclaiming vig

vote: stop getting banned
Though tons of fun, this gorram player is the king of scum.

VOTE: Gorkington
Iiiiiiiiis scuuuuuum.

In post 362, Porkens wrote:
In post 324, Gorkington wrote:
porkens wrote:How do you jump on fork here?
why was her vote worse than any other vote?

schadd_ wrote:i think porkens is
town
can you give me some words on this?
ill wait for her answer.

In post 363, Porkens wrote:
In post 326, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Hey yall!

VOTE: Jingle ♥

So here's my idea:

- Everybody investigates the same target and reveals results so we can compile/compare/analyze.

- The chosen target should be the towniest person by consensus - that's what we should be discussing once we've decided on a lynch but
before the hammer.
This is because…

- Mafia won't want to target that person because then results can be compared to flip (town or scum), so it's also a soft protection.
But we WANT our investigation target to die sooner rather than later.

In post 377, Porkens wrote:I totally disagree about the "towniest player" theory of the game.

I believe that if the targets don't die, and it will become a huge mess of unknown/uncertain information and gives the scum a lot more flexibility to make tactical maneuvers.

I think our strategy should be blunt: Mass investigate one target, out reports, lynch. Then we can start hashing out the data right away and give the scum less time to plan.

I'm going to assume that, given the setup, there is a janitor-like role that hides the flips of nightkills as well.

So, given all that, I think we should mass investigate the penultimate
scummiest
player.

In post 378, Porkens wrote:And just to add to that: we want to investigate and lynch scum. Those go together.
Investigating townie players is just not as useful.

In post 383, Porkens wrote:My understanding is that town wins these kind of cop games by mass investigating and then cross-checking results, regardless of the mix of cops, we should be able to figure some things out with a good spreadsheet (which we can't build if we don't get flips).

I'm not suggesting that we supplant scumhunting. We lynch the scummiest player, and just pick someone who we think are unlikely the mafia will nightkill. This is important due to janitor concerns.

Sanity randomness make results unreliable whether they are on mafia or town players. That doesn't persuade me that we should investigate those whom we think are town. Chances are

The "doc protection" is an illusion anyway. Town has one mechanic here that it has control over: reports. I say we use that mechanic.

TPFKAP is my "she" side, but I don't mind either way

In post 387, Porkens wrote:
In post 312, Porkens wrote:
In post 294, Punreader wrote:
In post 7, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:fuck yeah we claim doctor
I think arrest of the players can tell this is town. If need be, I can Retrieve my data on why I hold this opinion.

In post 28, PenguinPower wrote:Yea, but...I'm policy lynching...uh....
Power to you, my friend. I believe you have no place in a penitentiary.

In post 72, Jingle wrote:Mulch please be scum. Please.
I'd say your ping is possibly true, but it's a bit early to say for sure. Tentatively, I want to say you ring the right bells.

In post 41, Almost50 wrote:
In post 13, Porkens wrote:Who's in to policy lynch the stupid megahydra?
VOTE: stopgettingbannedagain
I Korina doesn't behave I might seriously consider it.
For now I wanna say hello to VOTE: Ginngie cuz we didn't get to talk much in the "Worst Game Ever"
I'd say you're nearly a townread. I sure hope you don't plead the 50th.

In post 40, Mulch wrote:I'm actually a paranoid cop btw
This is a pile of garbage I'm not sorting through right now.

In post 13, Porkens wrote:Who's in to policy lynch the stupid megahydra?
VOTE: stopgettingbannedagain
I take beef with this post, but I admit I might be a little heavy-hamded in my read there.

In post 18, schadd_ wrote:back of the napkin if you get two different checks on two different people it's 75% they're different alignments
VOTE: stop getting banned again
A little bit of a schaddy entrance.

In post 17, Gorkington wrote:
In post 15, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:we'll vig you porkens
counterclaiming vig

vote: stop getting banned
Though tons of fun, this gorram player is the king of scum.

VOTE: Gorkington
Iiiiiiiiis scuuuuuum.
Punreader, how did you put this post together?

In post 388, Porkens wrote:tr = row
th = header
td = cell

???

In post 389, Porkens wrote:[row][header]PLAYER[/header][header]N1 INVESTIGATION(TARGET;RESULT;FLIP)[/header][header]N2[/header][/row]
[row][cell]MULCH[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]
[row][cell]SGBA[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]
[row][cell]PENGUINPOWER[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]
[row][cell]PORKENS[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]
[row][cell]JINGLE[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]
[row][cell]GORKINGTON[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]
[row][cell]TITUS[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]
[row][cell]KIDAMN[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]
[row][cell]GINNGIE[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]
[row][cell]ALMOST50[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]
[row][cell]ESPECIALLYHEADERELIES[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]
[row][cell]SCHADD_[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]
[row][cell]CHEEKYTEEKY/PUN?[/cell][cell][/cell][cell][/cell][/row]

In post 390, Porkens wrote:yep that fixed it

In post 392, Porkens wrote:
PLAYER N1 INVESTIGATION(TARGET;RESULT;FLIP) N2

MULCH

SGBA

PENGUINPOWER

PORKENS

JINGLE

GORKINGTON

TITUS

KIDAMN

GINNGIE

ALMOST50

ESPECIALLYHEADERELIES

SCHADD_

CHEEKYTEEKY/PUN?

In post 395, Porkens wrote:Oh I guess not, sorry I assumed mafia would have roles other than their cop ones i guess not

In post 435, Porkens wrote:Vote to investigate: jingle

In post 474, Porkens wrote:Ok let's do some business. Bells, you town or not cause your behavior is scummy

In post 493, Porkens wrote:Ok. Ringmaster, version tells me gimmicks are crummy. Your thoughts

In post 512, Porkens wrote:Punguy, varsoon says gimmicks are scummy.

In post 515, Porkens wrote:eai uon't tsalk th weigh ewe want

In post 565, Porkens wrote:Jingle, how do you come up with that scum distribution?

In post 572, Porkens wrote:Sorry I forgot that.

As long as we agree on targets and figure out the data at some point, i think that's fine.

In post 573, Porkens wrote:Could we come up with some kind of investigation chain?
What if we just investigate the person below us on the playlist?
Porkens wrote:Sorry I forgot that.

As long as we agree on targets and figure out the data at some point, i think that's fine.
Wait, what about some kind of.investigation loop?

In post 576, Porkens wrote:Huh, but if we start building an x/y chart it will fill as we get flips. I think we'd get a lot of data as we go. No?

In post 580, Porkens wrote:Let's do it your way. I'm on board.

In post 597, Porkens wrote:A50, trust my read.

VOTE: penguinpower

In post 598, Porkens wrote:596 is a good post.

In post 599, Porkens wrote:This country is a disgrace right now.

Sorry.

In post 627, Porkens wrote:did you answer my question, spammer?

In post 648, Porkens wrote:I just don't have much to talk about. The plan is fine, we investigate the ban account and then lynch whoever. lets go

In post 705, Porkens wrote:VOTE: titus

i think this day is degrading

In post 789, Porkens wrote:I'm still where I was. all the recent posting is noise to me. im not saying its bad noise, but thats where im at.

In post 914, Porkens wrote:Sorry I'm basically done for this gameday

In post 915, Porkens wrote:VOTE: titus[/]

We're still investigating the hydra right?

In post 924, Porkens wrote:VOTE: unvote

I think titus might be town if a50 says so

In post 976, Porkens wrote:My guy says ^ is scum

In post 1010, Porkens wrote:VOTE: eddie

In post 1011, Porkens wrote:
In post 1004, Almost50 wrote:
In post 1003, eddie wrote:never mind i think pun's town LOL DONT KILL ME

VOTE: Porkens
Of all the posts I've cared to even read, this one needs to be explained the most.

I mean, you've just pit him at the bottom of your reads, so why the sudden flip?

Hint: I am TRing pun myself, so it's not "why is he a TR?", but rather why
the sudden change
?
It's omgus

In post 1033, Porkens wrote:don't lynch me.
ill be good.

VOTE: unvote
VOTE: titus

In post 1042, Porkens wrote:Okay sorry I haven't been participating enough this game whatever you know suck it but anyway look a 50 dude your stock isn't that high right now and while I love for lighting myself with you but the problem is that these guys went to lunch Titus apparently and if they don't do that when I make moves against that they tried to Lynch me so I was so preservation at this point I really like that anyways what else

In post 1043, Porkens wrote:Yeah like I said I don't think 8:50 saves Titus here unless one of them is scum in one is Town I'm using voice to text so I'm sorry if this is not making a lot of sense I'll try to do better but I think we need to assume that the people who are trying to game solver town and the people who are slacking but not me should be the targets so Eddie how about we Lynch Eddie

In post 1044, Porkens wrote:Obviously they could both be telling them Town not telling

In post 1045, Porkens wrote:I realize that he's not really slacking but I don't see him Town solving that much and that broken jpeg Avatar it's got to go

12, 13, 305: RVS

304, 307, 308, 309, 312, 362, 387, 388, 392, 493, 512, 515, 572, 598, 599, 705, 789, 914, : Content-less or near content-less

306: Good callout, I suppose, but you're hyperposting in this sequence, which isn't good.

310: Too many people are frustrated with the game at this state for you to just call it scummy.

311: Voting my townread over something I townread him for

363: This post is full of yuck, you didn't even think to point out that lynching a townread was bad.

377, 378: At least you pointed it out in your next post, though. Even though you cannot into setup.

383: I'm divided on how to feel about this post. My gut says town, but logic says you can't have missed that the setup is open.

395: Finally you into setup.

435: In what world is anyone but the mechahydra going to get investigated and then hyperlynched?

474: Jingle is doing better than you are so far.

565: Despite 395 claiming he is familiar with the setup now, shows that he's still unfamiliar with the setup. 572 shouldn't have been necessary.

573: Yes, anything but the accepted plan, yes? /s

576: Yes, but you're scumhunting here; didn't you mention that we should still be scumhunting earlier?

580: No need to seem so defeated

597: As of this point, I don't believe you've interacted with Penuin very much at all. At least it doesn't look like it in isolation. At least earlier you called A50 town, but even that seems flimsy.

627: Oh no, namecalling! That'll teach'em!

648: I disagree; there was a fair amount that could be talked about at this point.

789, 914: Way to avoid taking a stance on anything there buddy.

924: "this easy mislynch isn't so easy anymore"

976:
>knows eddie is arrogant as town
>scumreads him for being arrogant

1033: "lol pile on the titustrain"

1042: "why am I being scumread for being scummy?! I don't understand!"

1043: I'm not even touching this. I don't even know where to begin.

1045: Eddie is doing a lot more to solve the game than you are, right now.

In short: This is a good compromise lynch for the very reason he himself said:

In post 1045, Porkens wrote:I realize that he's not really slacking but I don't see him Town solving that much and that broken jpeg Avatar it's got to go

~tn5421

Jingle · Post Post #1077 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 6:28 pm

Porken's setup failures and misunderstandings came across as genuine to me, and the way he was wrong, (specifically expecting the balance to be based on scum having something to fuck with results) doesn't seem like something that could/would come from scum. In addition, the paranoia aimed at me tickled me in the town ways.

In post 1069, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:Pre-edit: I haven't seen Titus post since my wall, Jingle, did I miss something?

Her last 5 posts look like Titus playing the game to me. I think her reads are objectively terrible, but that doesn't mean she's not playing the game.

I'll go through your wall when I haven't spent the last 4 hours tracking down a runaway pet.

Porkens · Post Post #1078 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 7:05 pm

You did a pbpa of me

I love you right now

Porkens · Post Post #1079 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 7:07 pm

Seriously im drawing scum like flies here this is amazing

Stop Getting Banned Again · Post Post #1080 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 7:18 pm

In post 1078, Porkens wrote:You did a pbpa of me

I love you right now

In post 1073, Gorkington wrote:
@tn

can you take a look at porkens ISO specifically and talk at my face about them if you have time?

In post 1079, Porkens wrote:Seriously im drawing scum like flies here this is amazing

Mind explaining how providing information in a relatively concise way is scum-motivated?

Most of your early posts are garbage. Most of my early posts are garbage.
Show me that you're town, do useful things, there's lots of content to analyze already, etc.
You're a weak townlean for me right now, despite how tilted i was by the end of my pbpa on your posting so far.

~tn5421

Porkens · Post Post #1081 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 7:24 pm

Its gork and at least that head of the stupid hydra

Stop Getting Banned Again · Post Post #1082 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 7:28 pm

In post 1081, Porkens wrote:Its gork and at least that head of the stupid hydra

If you don't mind me saying so, that's not particularly convincing.
Please iso dive me, I signed all but one of my posts with "~tn5421". The one I didn't was where I blind posted the "Nice Jingle" 100% Orange Juice card.
Show me that you have a reason for this read other than "lol because I say so".

If you're town, I want to work with you to lynch the actual scum.

~tn5421

Stop Getting Banned Again · Post Post #1083 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 7:41 pm

231, 240, 250, 259, 269, 286, 288, 292 (i think), 296, 298, 374, 375, 376, 382, 523, 560, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1059, 1061, 1069, 1075, 1076, 1080, 1082, and whatever post number this is, is literally every post I've made in this game.

@Porkens
No more excuses. No more 'x feels like y' fake-content.
Make it happen. I've done most of the hard work for you already.

~tn5421

Porkens · Post Post #1084 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 7:51 pm

In post 1082, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:
In post 1081, Porkens wrote:Its gork and at least that head of the stupid hydra
If you don't mind me saying so, that's not particularly convincing.
Please iso dive me, I signed all but one of my posts with "~tn5421". The one I didn't was where I blind posted the "Nice Jingle" 100% Orange Juice card.
Show me that you have a reason for this read other than "lol because I say so".

If you're town, I want to work with you to lynch the actual scum.

~tn5421

You are scared.

Porkens · Post Post #1085 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 7:54 pm

Its better if i vote here.
VOTE: SGBA

Ginngie · Post Post #1086 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 7:56 pm

fuck you no it's not better if you vote there

that's vanity voting a wagon with less than 2 days left

that vote is useless.

Porkens · Post Post #1087 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 8:07 pm

In post 1086, Ginngie wrote:fuck you no it's not better if you vote there

that's vanity voting a wagon with less than 2 days left

that vote is useless.

Yeah but im right.

Ginngie · Post Post #1088 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 8:07 pm

Ginngie · Post Post #1089 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 8:08 pm

VOTE: PorkChop

Porkens · Post Post #1090 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 8:12 pm

Do you need a chainsaw, suits?

Ginngie · Post Post #1091 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 8:14 pm

sure you can call it that I guess

no one else reading will come to that conclusion given reading anything

so do what you want with it

Stop Getting Banned Again · Post Post #1092 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 8:40 pm

In post 1084, Porkens wrote:
In post 1082, Stop Getting Banned Again wrote:
In post 1081, Porkens wrote:Its gork and at least that head of the stupid hydra
If you don't mind me saying so, that's not particularly convincing.
Please iso dive me, I signed all but one of my posts with "~tn5421". The one I didn't was where I blind posted the "Nice Jingle" 100% Orange Juice card.
Show me that you have a reason for this read other than "lol because I say so".

If you're town, I want to work with you to lynch the actual scum.

~tn5421
You are scared.

In post 1085, Porkens wrote:Its better if i vote here.
VOTE: SGBA

If anyone here is scared it's you. This is blatant scum bull, especially in context with your previous behavior. You don't want to town? Fine. Get out.

VOTE: Porkens

~tn5421

Nosferatu · Post Post #1093 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 10:59 pm

Is this real life

Ginngie · Post Post #1094 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 11:02 pm

Is this a fantasy

Ginngie · Post Post #1095 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 11:25 pm

Is this just a fantasy

Draynth · Post Post #1096 (ISO) » Mon May 07, 2018 11:43 pm

Not entirely sure what's going on with this game rn, still fine with a porkens lynch though *shrug*

Nosferatu · Post Post #1097 (ISO) » Tue May 08, 2018 1:48 am

In post 1073, Gorkington wrote:is it just that theyre flying under the radar and havent pinged you at all yet

this more than anything

i had him as a nulltown off of like 2 two posts that felt good to me, but that read as not aged well in light of uhh
recent events

EspeciallyTheLies · Post Post #1098 (ISO) » Tue May 08, 2018 1:54 am

Prod received. Sorry. was away all weekend and caught a flat up in the wilderness so that's what I was dealing with yesterday - had no chance to get any quality time online.

skimmed. not much to add tbh. gork, re: porkens, jingle actually summed up my initial thoughts quite well:

In post 1077, Jingle wrote:Porken's setup failures and misunderstandings came across as genuine to me, and the way he was wrong

my confidence has since wavered only due to the titus wagon and the hopping on/off and none of that made any sense to me. it read like impatience.

anything else directed at me that i missed? i do have some work to do today but my plan is to go through the posts since friday a bit more thoroughly and reevaluate how i feel about the wagons right now. update my reads list if necessary.

PenguinPower · Post Post #1099 (ISO) » Tue May 08, 2018 2:00 am

VOTE: Porkens

PLAYER	N1 INVESTIGATION(TARGET;RESULT;FLIP)	N2
MULCH
SGBA
PENGUINPOWER
PORKENS
JINGLE
GORKINGTON
TITUS
KIDAMN
GINNGIE
ALMOST50
ESPECIALLYHEADERELIES
SCHADD_
CHEEKYTEEKY/PUN?