TheIn post 1297, REALMEN ONLY JUNGLE wrote:what? weren't you the one who wanted wilky dead? or maybe i misremembered
anyway, it's tough for me to follow the 180 but i'm okay with a dead tchill or verylazy
p-edit:
TheIn post 1297, REALMEN ONLY JUNGLE wrote:what? weren't you the one who wanted wilky dead? or maybe i misremembered
anyway, it's tough for me to follow the 180 but i'm okay with a dead tchill or verylazy
okay then i have no clueIn post 1300, Impossibear wrote:TheIn post 1297, REALMEN ONLY JUNGLE wrote:what? weren't you the one who wanted wilky dead? or maybe i misremembered
anyway, it's tough for me to follow the 180 but i'm okay with a dead tchill or verylazyonlyreason I was even considering the possibility of wilky being scum is because of RC. I gave him the benefit of the doubt on this one, but it doesn't pan.
p-edit:YEAH OK BUT THEN WHY COUNTER DAVE?
give me a pool of players your are willing to lynchIn post 1305, Impossibear wrote:There's a limit to how much WIFOM I'm willing to take on. You gotta stop the paranoia somewhere to get anything done.
p-edit: More will have to happen before that happens, to be honest. I need more on why wilky is scum if I'm to even consider that avenue of action.
In post 908, Tchill13 wrote:In post 877, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Hmmm...In post 863, Ouroboros wrote:If this guy doesn't have an alternative PT to be posting in, why the fuck is he making several separate posts in several separate posts?
This is an individual account, not a hydra, and given that they are new they don't have the ability to even make PTs.
Where is he making these separate posts properly forum formatted to be posted together when, if he's town, doesn't have access to any MS PTs?
Why is he taking so long and waiting to post everything together in the first place? What reasoning makes sense there besides him being scum who was holding off to let his team critique his posting?
Town has zero motivation to delay responses until later since clearly he had written these well in advance of 2:23- scum who is getting scumread because of their bad play and wanting team support does.
738: Thu May 10, 2018 2:23:30 pm
739: Thu May 10, 2018 2:23:46 pm
740: Thu May 10, 2018 2:24:00 pm
741: Thu May 10, 2018 2:24:11 pm (To note he quoted a post 300ish posts older and made a reply in 11 seconds)
742: Thu May 10, 2018 2:25:28 pm
I dunno the first 4 timestamps look a little bit too quick, but they may be a fast typer, i'll keep this in mind for the future.In post 878, Ouroboros wrote:HOLY FUCK HE DID NOT TYPE THOSE POSTS IN 16 SECONDS AND 11 SECONDS.
KEEP THIS IN MIND FOR WHAT FUTURE
KAEDE YOU'RE HARD PLAYING SCUM WINCON RIGHT NOWVOTE: ventriloquist
Yes of course. What did he do in that post besides quote some people and vote with them?In post 1309, REALMEN ONLY JUNGLE wrote:tchill did this though. did you think it was a bus?
your Ocam's razor says GiF put 2 millers again instead of messing with us by adding scum miller and normal one?In post 1311, Impossibear wrote:Ok. You believe what you want to believe. I'll go with occam's razor.
@Ram: ThisIn post 1296, Impossibear wrote:@Ram - I think you've misunderstood those quotes. It reads to me like Wraith is saying he's assuming none of the claims made at the time were false, not that the mod failed to provide safeclaims at all.
How is this scum indicative? I'm not following.In post 1291, Ramcius wrote:Wraith being confident is scum not having fakeclaims D1
fake townslip, but apparently i just misunderstoodIn post 1315, Ouroboros wrote:How is this scum indicative? I'm not following.In post 1291, Ramcius wrote:Wraith being confident is scum not having fakeclaims D1
Ghost
aka, that they would potentially be willing to jump into the miller counterclaim situation after mod metaing, and that's exactly what happened I believe.It wouldn't surprise me if Wilky has done research and is relying on the miller claim because he realises the host has done this before, especially since he chose to highlight that it wasn't far fetched for there to be 2 millers again. As Alchemist said though, this is relying on some pretty niche assumptions so I'm not buying it just yet.
I'm not dealing with this, again. I'm done.In post 1318, Ouroboros wrote:I am willing to brute force this if necessary.
Address my reasoning then. I'm not like screaming in anyone's face here and I'm a lot less opaque than I was about ventriloquist.In post 1323, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I'm not dealing with this, again. I'm done.In post 1318, Ouroboros wrote:I am willing to brute force this if necessary.