Product Placement Mafia (Game over!)

[Vaxkiller]

I dont like recks post about them thinking scum would kill brain and that means nsg is scum. It's really fucking me read up on them.

no, nsg needs to be lynched due to pine's night actions

Again, ELI5, how this is confirmed.

[Vaxkiller]

pending my full claim, sure.

Is there any risk in claiming now?

[northsidegal]

northsidegal (3):

xRECKONERx, Gammagooey, BBmolla

hyung (1):

Brian Skies

PenguinPower (2):

northsidegal, CheekyTeeky

Not voting (8):

PenguinPower, hyung, Firebringer, Titus, Vaxkiller, Alisae, Lady Lambdadelta, Pirate Mollie

With 14 alive, it’s 8 to lynch.

Votecounter notes

:
I am V/LA through Thursday.
If I have your vote in the wrong spot, please let me know.
Please stop voting me, I’m town

[xRECKONERx]

ill pass on scumhunting when we have night actions to enable my laziness

[xRECKONERx]

I dont like recks post about them thinking scum would kill brain and that means nsg is scum. It's really fucking me read up on them.

no, nsg needs to be lynched due to pine's night actions

Again, ELI5, how this is confirmed.

it's not confirmed
im arguing that nsg living til lylo with a potential "guilty" on her in terms of a rb stopping the kill is not possible

if she's a mislynch, scum can bank on her being easy mislynch fodder later due to pine's rb claim
if she's a scum lynch, then we win

either way it's a pro-town move

pending my full claim, sure.

Is there any risk in claiming now?

potentially.

[Titus]

So why would scum kill the RB instead of redirecting it?

Who said they did not do that?

[Titus]

We should lynch North. Fire's probably scum given Fire isn't but slim chance of X being town bus driver.

[Titus]

VOTE: North

[northsidegal]

that's an interesting reversal from yesterday. what changed your mind?

[Titus]

that's an interesting reversal from yesterday. what changed your mind?

Pine is confirmed town rather than obvscum.

[northsidegal]

if she's a mislynch, scum can bank on her being easy mislynch fodder later due to pine's rb claim

by the way, i've been thinking about this and it just kind of bothers me a bit:

if you think that i'm town by play, then why can't we just look at the people opportunistically trying to push my lynch on the basis of the roleblock and use that for scumhunting purposes? i don't understand your fatalistic approach that the fact that there's some reason to suspect me means that i

have

to be "mislynch fodder" for the entire game or something.

[northsidegal]

that's an interesting reversal from yesterday. what changed your mind?

Pine is confirmed town rather than obvscum.

so it's just based off of the roleblock?

[Titus]

that's an interesting reversal from yesterday. what changed your mind?

Pine is confirmed town rather than obvscum.

so it's just based off of the roleblock?

Yes.

[northsidegal]

okay then.

i thought people had already largely come to the consensus that the roleblock wasn't actually a "guilty" in any way.

what's more, you called me obvious town yesterday, if i'm recalling correctly.

do you think that i "have" to be the lynch or something? if so, why?

[Alisae]

Titus...
Titus...
Titus...

[northsidegal]

Titus...
Titus...
Titus...

hi do something please

[Brian Skies]

Titus, how come you never responded to me about this:

And it's not shocking your action misfired? Did you crumb at all your role/visit choice?

I'm pretty sure Fire was openly claiming targets. I do believe his final mention of an invention target on Day 1 was Reck in 1943.

This was also for you Titus.

While I don't care as much about the different target, I am interested in what you think of this.

[Titus]

okay then.

i thought people had already largely come to the consensus that the roleblock wasn't actually a "guilty" in any way.

what's more, you called me obvious town yesterday, if i'm recalling correctly.

do you think that i "have" to be the lynch or something? if so, why?

Can't live til lylo.

[Titus]

Titus, how come you never responded to me about this:

And it's not shocking your action misfired? Did you crumb at all your role/visit choice?

I'm pretty sure Fire was openly claiming targets. I do believe his final mention of an invention target on Day 1 was Reck in 1943.

This was also for you Titus.

While I don't care as much about the different target, I am interested in what you think of this.

Reck has zilch to do with this? It's the same principles as yesterday.

[Brian Skies]

Reck has zilch to do with this? It's the same principles as yesterday.

I disagree.

Especially from the angle you were shooting yesterday where you said scum were likely intentionally messing with Fire's night action.

[northsidegal]

people keep saying that, but, like, it really seems to me like it's entirely a prison of your own mental construct.

people agree that i am obviously town.

i

am

, completely objectively speaking, obviously town – i have never once put as much effort into a scum game as this. i literally don't care about being scum. i am a sort by postcount player.

so why does it seem like there's someone somewhere telling people that we

have

to lynch me before lylo for some unknown reason, even if it's obvious that i'm town?

[northsidegal]

like, it's just blindly following a rule. "north HAS to die before lylo". i don't get it. it's entirely a restriction of people's own making.

and people seem apologetic about it, which makes even less sense – like, reck saying that he thinks i'm town but that i have to die anyways, as if there's nothing he could do.

how about this – how about we play based on dayplay and based on reads and recognize the obvious instead of blindly following rules when they don't make sense in their application?

[Brian Skies]

Titus, how come you never responded to me about this:

And it's not shocking your action misfired? Did you crumb at all your role/visit choice?

I'm pretty sure Fire was openly claiming targets. I do believe his final mention of an invention target on Day 1 was Reck in 1943.

This was also for you Titus.

While I don't care as much about the different target, I am interested in what you think of this.

Reck has zilch to do with this? It's the same principles as yesterday.

Reck has zilch to do with this? It's the same principles as yesterday.

I disagree.

Especially from the angle you were shooting yesterday where you said scum were likely intentionally messing with Fire's night action.

I'm also going to add that I find it incredibly suspicious that you would have this major analysis where you suspect Pine and try to string him up off of potential night actions and him being a lightning rod (or there being a busdriver or whatever), but

completely

disregard Firebringer potentially softing Reck as the target the day before.

I do think Reck should be included in your thoughts somewhere. Even if it's an "I just don't think it's him," but there should be a reason for it.

Reck also avoided looking towards Hiplop's direction yesterday, and I pointed that out here.

I've also been kinda sorta giving Reck a pass for it, but I also absolutely LOATHE the fact I had to point out that Reck claimed to receive stuff Night 1 when he was addressing the lightning rod accusations. I definitely feel like he should have been the first to shoot that theory down.

[Firebringer]

VOTE: Reckoner

Nsg I don’t like how ur effort is more focused on arguing with the people who are pushing u for this roleblocker issue.
Can you not and do other things?

It seems like wasted energy and more I see you do it the weaker my tr on u is.

[northsidegal]

VOTE: Reckoner

Nsg I don’t like how ur effort is more focused on arguing with the people who are pushing u for this roleblocker issue.
Can you not and do other things?

It seems like wasted energy and more I see you do it the weaker my tr on u is.

I'm trying to push penguinpower. People seem far more interested in discussing this than that, so that's what I have to talk about.

I really want to hear everyone's opinion on penguin.