What?In post 467, Espeonage wrote:You flip red and all your reads become 'poof' meaningless, just like that.
I'm under forced engagement so yes that is exactly what I am doing.In post 476, the worst wrote:can you show me where omgus votes are scum indicative even?
s2g you're just spouting random armchair philosophy crap, you haven't made any effort to actually correctly sort me you're just tunnelling this shit
In post 73, Espeonage wrote:alrighty ducky, lets have a chat. bc you have a case of dumbs I'm not used to.
Hypothesis: You are ignoring that me being lazy is NAI because of a resounding OMGUS.
Supporting Evidence: In a multiball you need to focus on not falling behind and avoiding lynches because it is easier to towntell.
Conclusion: You are jumping on something you don't believe in because you feel it is good scum play day 1 of a multiball.
How will my experiment go?
Bear in mind I will wear safety goggles while working with reactive substances (in this case a dirty duckling).
What you're gonna find is that appeals to authority aren't gonna have a great effect on me...back to your valiant efforts to get duckling lynched though, I can appreciate that at least.In post 477, Espeonage wrote:Sando, pushing the you don't scumhunt normally is how I bussed last jungle republic and is in fact how you play multiball, so sit your arse down and get in your lane.
See I was gonna go back, but then NM dropped one of his game tunnels, and he has been pretty spot on recently. He's in form and being baller, so I figured I must be right.In post 481, the worst wrote:you quoted a tinfoil case from 400 posts ago
you are aware things have happened in the last 400 posts yes?
Ok this isn't an appeal to authority. It's a fact about a gametype.In post 482, Sando wrote:What you're gonna find is that appeals to authority aren't gonna have a great effect on me...back to your valiant efforts to get duckling lynched though, I can appreciate that at least.In post 477, Espeonage wrote:Sando, pushing the you don't scumhunt normally is how I bussed last jungle republic and is in fact how you play multiball, so sit your arse down and get in your lane.
@tw: I don't get why you voted esp after he tried to get votes on you, especially since you just told me you don't have a read on him. And like he has a reason for scumreading you even though you don't like it and don't agree with it? I don't get where the 'no reason' bit is coming from.In post 464, the worst wrote:yes it's an awful reflex
but you lurked until you're voted then come in and continue to tell people to vote me for....apparently no reason?
and there's a lot of people I don't feel like voting right now
I don't understand what you mean by this. Why is theorizing about multiball specifically werewolf indicative? Why is it even scum indicative in a generic-scum sense?In post 475, Sando wrote:I think Espe's theorising about multiball says he's werewolf, who are likely to play like normal scum imo. Directing town away from "normal" scumhunting is not helping town and has not been clarified.
He didn't do that in Stack the Deck, either. He was town, you were scum. What's the Vote Number on him?the worst wrote:his reasoning has literally not changed in 400 posts
he has also done nothing in 400 posts and is arrogantly digging in his heels on a bad read
this has upgraded from having no read to being like "rly bish"
Lurky but he said he was busy. I like the push on you, I dislike that he hasn't done much else, and I dislike your reaction to his posts.In post 490, the worst wrote:skitter, what do you make of Espe's approach to this game in general?
Theorising itself is not, but:In post 487, skitter30 wrote:I don't understand what you mean by this. Why is theorizing about multiball specifically werewolf indicative? Why is it even scum indicative in a generic-scum sense?
Scum are scumhunting. That's not normal.In post 494, Sando wrote:Theorising itself is not, but:In post 487, skitter30 wrote:I don't understand what you mean by this. Why is theorizing about multiball specifically werewolf indicative? Why is it even scum indicative in a generic-scum sense?
a) he's not backing up his theory, he's just saying "I've played jungle before, this is how you do it", hence my Appeal to Authority statement.
b) I think it's werewolf because they're the "traditional" scum in this game. They've got a NK, they don't have to worry about being NK'd and they've got a PR they need to deal with. They have some extra thoughts on their mind, like needing to get scum numbers lower (I think this is how end-game works from my reading), but overall they can probably play a formal normal scumgame, which I'm positing that you can therefore normally scumhunt. Espe is saying that you can't normal scumhunt (which I disagree with) and that's saying to town that they shouldn't do something that should in theory be just as effective against one-scumfaction, wolves. Hence via that old logic-centre in mah brain, most likely wolf.