Wait no since the gameplay is a little different from the board game...
For example, we don't secretly vote to accept or decline the mission.
Can we use hurt tags and if we get 3 hurt tags that skips a leader's mission?
And if so can we confirm that this wouldn't give the spies a point just like it wouldn't in the board game unless it happens to 6 leaders in a row?
In post 279, BuJaber wrote:Wait no since the gameplay is a little different from the board game...
For example, we don't secretly vote to accept or decline the mission.
Can we use hurt tags and if we get 3 hurt tags that skips a leader's mission?
And if so can we confirm that this wouldn't give the spies a point just like it wouldn't in the board game unless it happens to 6 leaders in a row?
Sure, I'll allow that. I'm kind of making up some mechanics as I go anyway to adapt leadership to the forum game. And, no, you can decline as you see fit, and I was going to add on the 6th one that declining would make the time on the mission run out, since I forgot to add it to the rules.
I'm kind of disorganized this game. I promise I am not this bad at modding mafia if any of you want to play in one of my future games.
I've only made one good post, and don't you dare accuse me of doing it again.
can confirm brass is a fantastic mafia mod
he's also good at ad lib, even though we're kinda winging it with the mechanic he will have thought thru this I bet
I had thought there was some rules about who could go on the next mission if it failed. I'll have to look at that. But it can't be what I thought because mechanically we must have one of the same people.
I'll properly analyze who's on what when I'm not barely awake.
Nope nothing about sending people on successive missions. Not in the rules at least.
So since TGP thinks it's Buj and me, but he's deferring to Pine who thinks its buj and iconeum he's sending everyone else which includes two of the previous team members.
Err, well given that neither Buj or I were on the last team, we cannot be the spies. So why did TGP even say that?
And the worst called TGP scum, but agreed to his team. What brought that change, TW?
Pine is obviouly voting for it, and Buj is unsurprisingly voting against it.
In post 295, the worst wrote:Tomorrow is a better day for analysis
I think you can probably take a stab at why I'm not objecting to this mission.
Probably. But attempting to do it now, won't stop be from doing it tomorrow.
You're not objecting because it will still help us isolate the scum? Because there's fair chance that who ever picks the team we'll end up with scum on it, but they might not sabotage as to not get caught? Because Buj is next and you don't trust him entirely either? All possible reason.
If I'm going to okay the mission, is there any good reason to wait for Iconeum? Because he basically has to veto.
I'm running on lack of sleep though, and don't think it's the best state to make decisions in. But a quick decision might be a good decision.
If there's a scum in here, we'll have to be very careful going on. I don't trust Bujaber, but if he's town, and we get it wrong, I'll feel really stupid. Anyway, he doesn't seem sure about who out of pine/tgp/tw is scum, and anyone would have to send one of them, so I don't think we'd be better off vetoing this mission.