Newbie 1874 - Game over

[Lefty]

VOTE: Lefty
Lynch this scum.

You’re lame.

Are you the scum then?

[Lefty]

Statistically speaking out of any sample of four players there’s a chance one of them is scum.

So outta me, Draynth, Ircher and FChariot my money would be on the last two.

FChariot for that crap bandwagon vote and Ircher for how he’s reacting to me. I blatantly challenge his vote and all he does is double down and call me scum for literally zero reason.

[Lefty]

VOTE: Iconeum

even though I don't know whether I should trust the IC or not

Why would them being IC make you regard them any differently than any other player?

[Huntress]

Vote Count 1.1

Lefty (3) - Draynth, Ircher, FChariot
Iconeum (1) - UnaBombaH
OnlyIAmMe (1) - stan1ey
FChariot (1) - Lefty

Not voting (3) - callitwhatyouwant, Iconeum, OnlyIAmMe


With nine players alive, it takes five votes to lynch.

Deadline for Day One is Saturday, 23rd June, 9.30 am BST, (in (expired on 2018-06-23 09:30:00)).

OnlyIAmMe and Iconeum are V/LA until Monday, 11th June.

[UnaBombaH]

VOTE: Iconeum

even though I don't know whether I should trust the IC or not

Why would them being IC make you regard them any differently than any other player?

You'd be surprised how many players think it's a reason to lynch/NK!
One recent example of a newbie game had scum keeping the IC alive for endgame mainly because they knew newbies would be needlessly paranoid of them.

It's good to note however, that the only separation of "IC" and "SE" in this game, is that I have voluntarily taken upon me the task to "mentor" and help all of you to the best of my abilities.
I also swear to answer to any questions involving game-mechanics

TRUTHFULLY

, and to the best of my knowledge - something that isn't mandatory for the SEs.
I'll be using this colored text to try and separate the "IC-talk" from gameplay.

Note that the mod uses a green color this text -

DON'T CONFUSE US WITH EACH OTHER!

[OnlyIAmMe]

Ending my v/la today, will be here later.

[OnlyIAmMe]

Newbie 1874

Player list

OnlyIAmMe
stan1ey
callitwhatyouwant
FChariot
Lefty
Iconeum (SE)
Draynth (SE)
Ircher (SE)
UnaBombaH (IC)

Alive (9/9):

Spoiler:

OnlyIAmMe
stan1ey
callitwhatyouwant
FChariot
Lefty
Iconeum (SE)
Draynth (SE)
Ircher (SE)
UnaBombaH (IC)

Dead (0/9):

Spoiler:

None yet.

Game Events

vote:draynth

because why not

[OnlyIAmMe]

Sorry!

[Huntress]

KernelRunaway replaces callitwhatyouwant.

[KernelRunaway]

Hi everybody!

VOTE: Draynth

I'm a left-hander, and there's no place for your blatant sinistrophobia in today's society.

[Ircher]

Statistically speaking out of any sample of four players there’s a chance one of them is scum.

So outta me, Draynth, Ircher and FChariot my money would be on the last two.

FChariot for that crap bandwagon vote and Ircher for how he’s reacting to me. I blatantly challenge his vote and all he does is double down and call me scum for literally zero reason.

Statistically speaking out of any sample of

one

player there's a chance one of them is scum.

So outta Lefty my money would be on the last one.

[KernelRunaway]

Why the Lefty hate Ircher? Doesn't just seem RVS?

[Ircher]

Gotta the game going somehow.....

[KernelRunaway]

Calling a Draynth / Ircher scumteam RN.

[Ircher]

Lol, why?

[KernelRunaway]

Nah I'm just playing. That said, early reads, Lefty is scumhunting. Why RVS wagon the guy who is doing the work?

[KernelRunaway]

Statistically speaking out of any sample of four players there’s a chance one of them is scum.

So outta me, Draynth, Ircher and FChariot my money would be on the last two.

^ Although this is sh1tty logic.

[Ircher]

Lefty's ISO so far:

1. In 12:

First!

VOTE: stan1ey

There’s only room this game for one player’s name ending in Y

RVS; not scumhunting.

2. In 13:

VOTE: Lefty
Everyone knows left-handed people are evil

This is a myth

Not scumhunting; I guess you consider it a kind of RVS banter.

3. In 15:

VOTE: Lefty
Too many posts.

Have another.

Not scumhunting; simply RVS-like trolling.

4. In 17:

[/unvote]
VOTE: FChariot
Scummy bandwagon is scummy.

Okay, I somewhat agree that FChariot's vote change pings in a way, but I'm not sure I'd call it an alignment-indicative way. Regardless, I don't really consider this scumhunting; it seems more OMGUS in nature tbqh.

5. In 18:

UNVOTE: VOTE: FChariot
Ebwop. Sorry still learning the codes here

Basically a (failed) tag correction. Also:

Code: Select all

[unvote]Player[/unvote]

Yields UNVOTE: Player. But to change votes, you generally don't need to unvote first.

6. In 21:

*gets voted by two other people*
*votes most recent voter*

First vote was rando. Second vote ~pressure I’m assuming
Your vote with throw away comment? No beuno.

Okay, I guess you could call this scumhunting.

7. In 22:

VOTE: Lefty

Not scumhunting.

8. In 23:

That was a really nice gif of Will Smith flipping you off, Ircher.

Shame.

Not scumhunting.

9. In 25:

VOTE: Lefty
Lynch this scum.

You’re lame.
Are you the scum then?

This doesn't really count as scumhunting as the reasoning seems to be more that they are annoyed with me versus actually thinking I'm scum. (Or perhaps both but the former is not a good reason for the latter.)

10. In 26:

Statistically speaking out of any sample of four players there’s a chance one of them is scum.

So outta me, Draynth, Ircher and FChariot my money would be on the last two.

FChariot for that crap bandwagon vote and Ircher for how he’s reacting to me. I blatantly challenge his vote and all he does is double down and call me scum for literally zero reason.

Kinda scumhunting, kinda not. The statistics argument however is meaningless.

11. In 27:

VOTE: Iconeum

even though I don't know whether I should trust the IC or not

Why would them being IC make you regard them any differently than any other player?

This counts somewhat as scumhunting.

So yeah, I guess I can agree that Lefty is scumhunting to some extent. But is it to a meaningful extent? No, not really. Is it okay for where we are right now? Sure. Do I want to move my vote? No, not really as leaving my vote isn't really hurting anyone, and there's no real reason for me to change my vote.

[Ircher]

Statistically speaking out of any sample of four players there’s a chance one of them is scum.

So outta me, Draynth, Ircher and FChariot my money would be on the last two.

^ Although this is sh1tty logic.

Hence why I made this post:

Statistically speaking out of any sample of four players there’s a chance one of them is scum.

So outta me, Draynth, Ircher and FChariot my money would be on the last two.

FChariot for that crap bandwagon vote and Ircher for how he’s reacting to me. I blatantly challenge his vote and all he does is double down and call me scum for literally zero reason.

Statistically speaking out of any sample of

one

player there's a chance one of them is scum.

So outta Lefty my money would be on the last one.

[Lefty]

Statistically speaking out of any sample of four players there’s a chance one of them is scum.

So outta me, Draynth, Ircher and FChariot my money would be on the last two.

^ Although this is sh1tty logic.

Shitty, yeah. But not always wrong either.

Would a put a ton of confidence in that on pg2? Lol no but it’s better than RVS.

[Ircher]

No, that logic isn't better than RVS.

[Ircher]

Everyone has a 2/9 chance of being scum. Just because you are choosing a subset of the player list doesn't mean the probability for any individual goes up (or down).

[Lefty]

Everyone has a 2/9 chance of being scum. Just because you are choosing a subset of the player list doesn't mean the probability for any individual goes up (or down).

It also doesn’t mean one of us four isn’t scum. We have all the exact same probability and from my standpoint (and yours presumably) I only have to sort the three of you for now.

[KernelRunaway]

Everyone has a 2/9 chance of being scum. Just because you are choosing a subset of the player list doesn't mean the probability for any individual goes up (or down).

It also doesn’t mean one of us four isn’t scum. We have all the exact same probability and from my standpoint (and yours presumably) I only have to sort the three of you for now.

Statistically speaking out of any sample of four players there’s a chance one of them is scum.

So outta me, Draynth, Ircher and FChariot my money would be on the last two.

FChariot for that crap bandwagon vote and Ircher for how he’s reacting to me. I blatantly challenge his vote and all he does is double down and call me scum for literally zero reason.

So out of your list of four, including yourself, you explained why you picked Ircher and FCHariot in the list, why Draynth?

[Lefty]

It’s the best lead I’ve got for now and I think this convo could be productive and spring board into actual play (it already has) so I don’t mind it for now.

I got put to L-2 on page 1. Draynth’s post was RVS and humorous so I don’t really mind it. Your’s seemed like a pressure vote which in a generic sense I don’t mind either. FC’s put me at L-2 while simultaneously making a throwaway comment that had nothing to do with my wagon, the people on it, or the fact it put me at L-2. So for now, that’s where I wanna investigate.