VOTE: Performer/vote]In post 39, Performer wrote:@teacher ah, I see
@bbt I was reading your profile. Also, you are one of the fm players I model my play after
@tommy we have alts in here? Who are they alts of?
VOTE: garmr
Lurkers make me suspicious.
I agree with this. But then why this:BBT's signature wrote:Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
In post 45, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Unfortunately, secret alts are all over the place. I'd sooner policy lynch em all!
This is a good post.In post 61, Tchill13 wrote:wondering if invisibility is just trying to LOOK town or not.
I don't have much else to say on your wagon - but with the current gamestate I am even more inclined to push you now.In post 70, Lefty wrote: Random wagoning is all good and fine. I was just seeing what BBT had to say since they pushed it several times
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here and I'm not sure whether this vote is serious or not. I feel like it is?In post 71, teacher wrote:Im actually kind of inclined to agree. Last time I played with Town!BBT, they pushed a mislynch (me, grrrr) several times, but at least provided reasoning.
VOTE: BBT.
BBT - strongest scum/town read, why, and +rand on it?
You’re retroactively making a reason to sustain the push now?In post 78, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I don't have much else to say on your wagon - but with the current gamestate I am even more inclined to push you now.
OK now my vote is serious.In post 84, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:There may be something that tells me you're town - but I want to ignore it for now.
now this could be scum... You really expect a reason for pushing a wagon before page 5?In post 71, teacher wrote:Im actually kind of inclined to agree. Last time I played with Town!BBT, they pushed a mislynch (me, grrrr) several times, but at least provided reasoning.
VOTE: BBT.
BBT - strongest scum/town read, why, and +rand on it?
In post 47, Gustavo wrote:I’m down for a fast day. I’m getting ready to play a game that ends in 36 hours so I need practice
In post 48, Invisibility wrote:i'm down for not doing that
In post 50, Invisibility wrote:why not use more the 36 hours to nail scum?
i was addressing this interaction from invisibility. its easy to spew town this early on a stance like that. It's not "fluff". It's invisibility purposefully looking town. tbh i believe scum have more to gain from spewing town early and seek to do so more than actual townies.In post 52, Invisibility wrote:im not saying take forever, i'm just saying don't rush the game
In post 79, Lefty wrote:You’re retroactively making a reason to sustain the push now?In post 78, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I don't have much else to say on your wagon - but with the current gamestate I am even more inclined to push you now.
Like talk me thru it here. I get wagoned for lulz, whatever. You call for more votes. I ignore the first time thinking it’s likely you’re just poking me to see if I squirm and maybe to see how others treat the wagon. Fair enough. No one really bites so you do it again. Still no one bites. Then you do it a third time, and instead of joining on me you get snap voted by two others.
All the while I’m asking what your game is, which you refuse to answer, and get another vote.
So now that you have been pushing me for no discernible reason, and people are voting you for it, you’re using that as a sign to push me further? That’s your angle?
BBT seems to have the same mindset i do early. Pretty much any and every townie is expendable days 1 and 2. Wagon reasoning doesnt matter until theres an actual reason to wagon (a reason that can be validated).In post 80, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:That sums it up pretty well yeah. Saved me having to explain it as well.
@BBT lefty is either scum or new town. New scum would react the same way though. I dont think his reaction is AI. Scum would surely know the 1st wagon never goes through and would welcome it instead of fighting it so meticulously. That's the only reason i'd lean town on lefty. Not saying i lean town on lefty yet for the record.In post 84, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:There may be something that tells me you're town - but I want to ignore it for now.
In post 92, Tchill13 wrote:if the team was gosrir, byron and teacher that'd be pretty funny... oh well. just so you know i think guessing teams is stupid day 1 but ppl do it allll the time.
im not lynching bbt today though. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt until day 2 possibly 3. Yes it's solely because i understand his style early which is a very easy style to manipulate as scum early. I'm giving him a chance above everything else i've seen though.
Tr-BBT
Scum-Teacher
no reads in between.
In post 90, Tchill13 wrote:BBT seems to have the same mindset I do early. Pretty much any and every townie is expendable days 1 and 2. Wagon reasoning doesnt matter until theres an actual reason to wagon (a reason that can be validated).
bad postIn post 77, Gosrir Elmer Odels wrote:I agree with this. But then why this:BBT's signature wrote:Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.In post 45, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Unfortunately, secret alts are all over the place. I'd sooner policy lynch em all!
This actually reminds of a mini where boon vastly overreacted and self-voted his early RVS wagon, then was largely left alone by this very reasoningIn post 93, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I actually think Lefty is newb town - scum tend to shy away from addressing their wagons (and potentially inviting direct confrontation) and try to look unbothered about being pushed. I guess Lefty could be over reacting scum but it doesn't feel like that to me.
