meh, kinda wondering if you hopped on because you saw other people joining it
--
In post 192, AP wrote:
Nope. That was the slot that actually got me pulling my hair off. Al he seems to do is nitpick anything that anyone else says. It looks like he wants to stand out as "doing something different" but -at the same time- nothing productive. He's spewing doubt in every single case or line of reasoning anyone else tries to build upon and that's it.
i'm getting a general vibe of like ... contrariness from him, if that makes sense? like he's trying to stir up conflict almost?
--
In post 194, BuJaber wrote:@skitter - not exactly. I was saying that the fact that I said I predict that 1 scum is among the researchers doesn't necessary mean I didn't research. It just so happens to be true but since it was just a prediction on something nai (research) the next time I predict something similar I might be among the pool. In this case the fact that multiple people have researched past games points to one f them being scum simply because I find it highly unlikely that all those that researched are town. Especially since scum benefit more from the research in this setup imo.
No brass scumread is based on the meta thing I mentioned. I wasn't thinking about him or anyone else in particular when I made the prediction.
I dunno I kinda felt that oka's posts seemed like active participation for the purposes of scumhunting. But given the wagon on him it'd be worth reading his ISO to see all his posts together and assess his total contribution to the game so far.
i agree that it's very likely that scum researched past iterations of this setup, but the actual act of posting about the result of that research is generally nai to me unless osmeone was like trying to get towncred for doing all that work. in a vaccum i don't that posting such things is scum-indicative or town-indicative; scum may have researched but not bothered to post their results, and town might not have researched at all; those would look the same too.
like i don't think the acts of 'researching' necessitates 'posting about the research' and just because scum are more likely to do the former doesn't make them more likely to do the latter amongst the people who researched, if that makes sense.
--
In post 195, Enigma wrote:Gut says one of the three who jumped on are scum.
I don't think there is (for myself, at least) any point in trying to rationalise ruru for now. I think I'll just ignore her and her claim until later in the game where it will all unravel if she's scum.
Also I was just waiting to see if ofrhz would feel like explaining himself later. He asked a few qs, I responded but he didn't say end up reasoning in thread but rather just jumped on the wagon. Though I imagine it was due to my attention on ruru, and given the controversy and difference of opinions there - leaning the suspicion towards sky.
i'm still not entirely sure why you think sky's vote was the worst tbh? i actually kinda liked it for how obvious she was being about sheeping townreads - scum i feel like don't usually lampshade votes that way or are that blatant about it
--
tending towards town - you feel a lot more engaged like ... *here* than last game, if that makes sense. your posts are also exhibiting a level of insight that was kinda lacking last time.
(i know you said without meta but i have a lot trouble reading your sort of playstle cold tbh so i try to use other things to form the read - if you noticed last game my read on you was basically based on associatives and very little of it was based on what *you* were doing; most of what you actually did wasn't really AI for me; here since i have a baseline for how you play i can compare what you're doing here to what you did there)
--
In post 207, Sando wrote:
Yeah but mod is away with some personal issues I think and so it hasn't technically finished. Me and AP have access to the dead thread, CJ and AP have access to the wolf thread, and Skitter has nothing
poor me
--
In post 209, OkaPoka wrote:*post to indicate that i am sick but still slightly skimming the thread and expressing discomfort on the enigma wagon*
when you come back, can you talk more about why you don't like it?
--
In post 214, Sando wrote:
I think your math is off still, but to confirm, you're saying policy lynch them the last day where their vengeance won't tip that lynch into a lylo retrospectively?
sando, any hot takes on the game thus far?
