Invisibility is in this game?In post 249, OkaPoka wrote:pretty sure ausuka is in this game more than invis is, brass.
VOTE: Invisibility
I'd rather have the pressure vote on someone I forgot was in the game than Ausuka who I at least remembered.
Invisibility is in this game?In post 249, OkaPoka wrote:pretty sure ausuka is in this game more than invis is, brass.
i think he's come to the conclusion that he wants a pl; i don't think he's arguing for both sides of a pl - where do you see that happening? above he said something along the lines of: 'tldr i don't think a pl on ruru is such a bad idea'.In post 244, BuJaber wrote:YupIn post 243, skitter30 wrote:and what, this whole thing is awkward distancing for the towncred once ruru flips scum?
Or he's bad at scum.
Like.. the whole arguing for both sides of the PL seems like a cop-out. You're either for or against. You can change your mind about it, but to be both for AND against at the same time?.. scummy.
Like if enigma is scum and ruru is town why even mention that ruru might be vengeful? Get credit for being cautious? That doesn't work. He just looks bad here so I'm thinking maybe he's trying to get credit for the PL but not actually wanting the PL to happen and that's where the ruru association came from.
If you want the opinion of someone who hasn't played with any of the so called 'clique' .. except maybe skitter I think we've played once before not sure... I understand and agree with the skitter townread. I can see why someone would lean town for ruru but the rest I don't see anything obvtown about them so it makes me uncomfortable when there is a group that trusts each other this quickly. Scum absolutely will try to infiltrate the town bloc and any townie should have healthy skepticism wrt those that agree with them / TR them.
i think i answered this question as best i can aboveIn post 246, OkaPoka wrote:@skitter30 you like how people hopped on the wagon with naked votes?
this seems like a really contrived reason to sr ruru? why do you believe so strongly that scum would go for vig/pgo and why do you think town!ruru shares your opinion about it?In post 226, Enigma wrote: Tbh, this is how I see your earlier actions on pgo claim:
1. Town and true claim
IMO not town-optimal play but w/e not beating a dead horse. There is a high chance scum tried to go for that role, and probably failed. So scum likely know you are telling the truth, and wouldn't be so surprised - you would know this and afford extra scrutiny to those who are less surprised when you are scum hunting (which is not what is happening rn).
---
TLDR: PL ruru doesn't seem like a bad idea.
i had 7 posts in 2 days at this point. this is far above prod range, it is also completely normal activity. yes, this is normal activity for me and has been for a while, and i would have thought that you would know that.In post 239, brassherald wrote:Is Ausuka always this quiet? I literally cannot remember.
this seems town.In post 240, vulcan logician wrote:Hey guys, I'm here. I'm like 3 pages behind but I'm catching up. So sorry to have not contributed. I'm gonna do a list of ISO reads to make up for it though.
So far, I gotta say that Ceej is the towniest I've ever seen him. I lean town on him, but my inner paranoiac wonders if scum!ceej is just not super towny. (I've never played with Ceej as scum.) I know that I tend to come off as more towny when I roll scum... perhaps because, in those cases, I actually take time to do things with the intent to come off as towny.
I'm no longer feeling my BuJaber vote, so
UNVOTE:
Also ofrhz seems pretty town too.
I'll probably have a scum pick or two after I do my ISOs, so stay tuned.
this is utterly ridiculous. i've been playing the game and i've given reads. if my activity is really unacceptable to most players in this game i can replace out, but what you've been doing isn't helpful in any way.
wutIn post 261, Ausuka wrote:not scumreading invis, definitely not for the oka vote; feel like the unapologetic nature of the vote instead of making up some justification is town-indicative.
i like the wagon situation w/ enigma and oka.
yeah, i feel like invis is town? it's 2 days into d1.In post 268, OkaPoka wrote:wutIn post 261, Ausuka wrote:not scumreading invis, definitely not for the oka vote; feel like the unapologetic nature of the vote instead of making up some justification is town-indicative.
i like the wagon situation w/ enigma and oka.
you are really townreading a tone vote this late into day 1?
imo feels like a lame reason to tr but whateverIn post 270, Ausuka wrote:yeah, i feel like invis is town? it's 2 days into d1.In post 268, OkaPoka wrote:wutIn post 261, Ausuka wrote:not scumreading invis, definitely not for the oka vote; feel like the unapologetic nature of the vote instead of making up some justification is town-indicative.
i like the wagon situation w/ enigma and oka.
you are really townreading a tone vote this late into day 1?
people were scumreading invis, for reasons I felt were playstyle related and not scummy, so I spoke about my read on that player. although I don't really need a justification- if a player is being talked about it is perfectly normal to also give your opinion on that player.In post 271, OkaPoka wrote:imo feels like a lame reason to tr but whateverIn post 270, Ausuka wrote:yeah, i feel like invis is town? it's 2 days into d1.In post 268, OkaPoka wrote:wutIn post 261, Ausuka wrote:not scumreading invis, definitely not for the oka vote; feel like the unapologetic nature of the vote instead of making up some justification is town-indicative.
i like the wagon situation w/ enigma and oka.
you are really townreading a tone vote this late into day 1?
what made you compelled to voice your position on invis?