1. In
1390,
The Worst wrote:@1-9 can you elaborate on these?
Drixx - Null
Frozen Angel - Town
NicoRobin - Null
zMuffinMan - Leaning Town
Cerberus v666 - Scum
Randomidget - Null leaning scum
Nancy Drew 39 - Scum
Drixx is null because they haven't done much. Same thing for NicoRobin and Randomidget really. (Nico has a reputation for posting in bursts and lurking at other times. Drixx doesn't post often either, but they do post semi-regularly. I am not sure about Randomidget, so I lean scum there because lurking is slightly more likely to come from scum than town, especially since it likes they are kinda actively lurking.)
Frozen Angel is town based on early game interactions and all. I also highly doubt that scum piled up their votes on Frozen Angel, so I think Frozen was chosen by town-motivated voters.
Muffin I keep going back and forth on, but as I mentioned earlier, Muffin's meta check on me registers as something town would do. In particular, scum would be more inclined just to keep on pushing the lynch without conducting research or employing the argument that "meta is useless because it is easily manipulated" which really isn't true if you know what you are looking for with meta.
Cerberus is scum for a couple of reasons. For instance, I don't really like
1062 because it is basically Cerb shutting down any other potential wagons... It's not like we were *that* close to deadline at the time.
1045 is bad because it seems most (if not all) of Cerb's reads come down to policy-related reasons versus actual content. Eh, let's most (if not all) of Cerb's scumreads. Another issue with the post is that it suggests that Cerb isn't really paying attention to the game as they should if they were town. (This is given their level of activity throughout the game; based on that, they should have quite a few solid reads, but the post gives the impression that they do not.)
942 is another example of this kind of theme in Cerb's posts: pushing reads for mostly policy or "OMGUS" reasons versus based on scum motivations. There was some other, early-game stuff as well.
Nancy is scum primarily based on gut-related reasons. Still, some things that stick out include
256 (not really a good suggestion) and
501 (being contrary just for the sake of it).
552 also feels off as well, but this is not easily explained.
558 is basically Nancy running with something Titus says. (Which to be clear, I don't get that impression from Nancy's posts.)
728 is more information than analysis. Simply stating "odd" isn't really much in terms of analysis; it looks more like scum trying to look like they're doing constructive stuff when they aren't.
2. In
1391:
Ankamius wrote:I like how numbers thinks that my two strongest scumreads are my scumpartners
What makes you think my reads have anything to do with associatives? The reads are more or less independent of one another. See, it's stuff like this that cause me to scumread your slot.
3. In
1395:
Ankamius wrote:But his reads are pretty blatantly not good reads when you compare them to the game as a whole
1) Having reads different from everyone else has been a scumread since when?
2) Having reads different from everyone else makes then bad reads since when?
4. In
1397:
Ankamius wrote:What do you think about him being willing to lynch the person who is scumreading nancy the hardest before nancy
I would like to note that my lynchpool wasn't really ordered. I mean, I'm voting Titus right now, so one could say I want them lynched before the other two, but Titus hasn't really been aggressively scumreading Nancy as far as I remember.
5. In
1478:
Frozen Angel wrote:why?
(In response to
902): Primarily gut-related reasons. I feel it would've been written differently if it came from scum.
Frozen Angel wrote:Why was it a bad post?
(In response to
924): It's bad because the reads seem to be almost 100% effort-based.
6.
1497 by Frozen is a stellar town post.
1529 is also a really good post.