okay so NM/MM is two scum
In post 28, Marshmallow Marshall wrote: In post 13, Enigma wrote:
Because his first post is to set up a defence for when he gets accused later in game
tbh woulda done it regardless of his RV
"but guayyys im behaving scummy not because im scum but but but because its how i always play"
How are you so sure he is town already from just one post?
In post 15, Enigma wrote:he's only played a few games, have a look at his flips?
VOTE: Not_Mafia
0 mention of NM, then votes him. RVS, sure, but high equity to be a SvS interaction. He never addresses it again.
[quote\]However, the fact that he searched for me is quite townish... but again, we must not read for activity[/quote]
This is pretty fucking strange: why would I have bothered to search for him. This isn't a question of reading for activity, it's a question of the fact that it's something I have literally no motivation to do as scum besides to fake my towngame.
writing it off as activity is scum handwaving a reason to townread me.
next mention of N_M and it implies that NM is empty and not engaging but makes no effort to follow it up
Wait, no. It doesn't because you did not even refer to what you meant. Unless you intentionally made a double edged question...
this is still ick
Why I townread RC but wonder if he didn't try to buddy me? Because he's right, but he saw only a half of the post (As did Enigma, but I do not believe it has a strong scum use). He said it looked like genuine anger, and he's right, because it took a long long time on my homesite for people to accept my style, even as town. However, I worded that in a so scummy way that I thought he would at least MENTION it was scummy. Idk, I'm not saying he should've scumread me for it, but maybe... express an healthy amount of suspicion towards a genuine-scummy post? I still townread him though.
this is again awful
if he thinks that he was genuinely scummy and that I called him scum regardless then he should have a problem with that. lack of healthy amount of suspicion towards a genuinely scummy post is something you should be worried about it
this is again another part where the way he talks about his read on me should be a scumread but he ends up saying that he townreads me in spite of it
NM comes in, continues to do absolutely nothing
Someone please give an award to RC who got N_M to post serious stuff. That seriously deserves a medal. @N_M, reads yet? What do you think about me?
I am asking this question to everyone btw. Please answer.
this is a really bad post, way he singles out nm feels kind of bad but the extending it to everyone gives definite gut vibes that he's trying to not make NM look different in his ISO from other people
also really the whole 'I was intentionally scummy' makes a lot more sense as scum who just thinks that they were scummy and is repeatedly trying to make an excuse for it than as town who was intentionally acting scummy for reasons that make no sense
Not_Mafia. He's not different from the games I've played with him, and he was town in every of them. Slight slight slight townish lean.
townread on NM is cmoplete garbage.
weird post
+
why is he asking someone that he supposedly townreads to defend themselves?
Tbh, I agree with you... Since scum have a perma chat, they can plan during day. It's not like normal setups where D1 is the 14 first days where scum don't have any coordination.
I think the odds of him actually making this post as town are super super low, I don't think newbies generally think a lot about hwether scum have daychat or not
In post 167, Not_Mafia wrote:You can't leash someone when there's no consequences to them not following through with the plan
again the setting up venge chains order is super, super, super protown and increases town equity a ridiculous amount
who are the two people in this game who try to discourage us from setting up venge chains so that we can prevent scum from getting nightkills? these two.
In post 182, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:Tomorrow I'll explain y'all the reasons of my strategy. If you're town, you should probably convince us you are. And if you're scum, you should try to lie!
I can't put anything to this that anyone would understand but I think this post is extremely scum indicative
what's with the focus on the NM read? Why does NM come up so disproporitonately often for someone who is barely in the game
In post 193, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:Right now, I have doubts on N_M. He actually contributed, which is against his town meta... I've never seen him play scum, but does someone know if he acts more contributive as town or scum, or if it's NAI?
and again another terribly svs interaction: his rationale is basically that NM is scummy because they actually posted but instead of following up on that he immediately goes to other people to try to get them to dissuade him
Well, half of N_M's posts were about ISP term, but he actually expressed a legitimate concern about leashing vengekills, which is 100% right. He doesn't feel like the previous games I played with him. Unless it's because I'm town now o.0
yeah ok
In post 200, Marshmallow Marshall wrote: In post 195, IcemanCh wrote:VOTE: Oath
If we are not using any strategy to votes/veng kills then I think we need to put pressure on Oath. Only three posts and zero content.
@Oath what are your reads? What do you think of the current game state?
I agree.
VOTE: Oath Btw you have gained town points for your stream of posts. I'll post another list of reads tomorrow... with simple colors
votes the counterwagon to NM despite having just claimed NM as a scumread then tries to call me out for me asking him why he voted oath instead of answering
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
