with 14 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.
day one will end in (expired on 2018-07-25 18:30:00)
- no change in votes, just calling it a night! Gn all
- skitter30 v/la Fridays & Saturdays
- quack
why?In post 447, Ausuka wrote: I still feel oka is kinda scummy but can't justify that? My strongest scumread outside Enigma is brassherald.If enigma is town there's scum in {ofr, skitter} IMO.
is this still talking about sando's reaction to brass's analysis of his scumgame? if it is, then fwiw, i agree with sando and skitterIn post 443, BuJaber wrote:1 person. Who shared an opinion. Who could be wrong.In post 441, Sando wrote:Others are telling you exactly what I'm telling you, you don't want to listen to people and would rather double down on a bad argument.In post 440, BuJaber wrote:Believe me I'd love to find out that I'm wrong about what is scummy or not.
In post 423, skitter30 wrote:i don't really think this is a good reason to scumread him and i feel like the reasoning is kinda weak and ignores context
Okay I think some of your back and forth makes more sense here. Aside from the “Sando agreeing with brass” thing, do you have a read on Sando?In post 455, BuJaber wrote:Let's make sure we're all talking about the same thing.
Skitter said she thought my reasoning is weak and she doesn't think Sando is scummy.
But my long discussion with Sando actually became about a whole different thing now. It is about a much more general thing: whst is the safest reaction as scum to someone describing things you would do as scum, correctly. Sando thinks it's ignore. I think ignoring would be suicide. So I asked him to provide me evidrnce of ignoring working in his favor in the future.
Sorry to hear that brass. Take it easyIn post 458, brassherald wrote:@Mod my fiancee and I just broke up, I'm going to be a mess for a few days, just replace me please.
pinging meIn post 377, AP wrote:@ruru.@Oka: Can we like.. shut this conversation about claims off?If I was scum I would have loved you both for the amount of ideas you're giving me.
P.S. I am now leaning town on Oka, I'm more inclined to believe it's his argumentative playstyle that's annoying me, but I can certainly see the town motive behind his play, and I think it bad for scum!him to do this.
UNVOTE:
honestly i think he could have just ignored it and moved on without anyone really noticing or commenting on it.In post 380, BuJaber wrote:Let's go about it a different way.
Town talks about one of the scum's meta and is pretty accurate. How do you imagine scum responds to that? I see 3 options.
A) disagree and argue that it is not correct
B) ignore
C) agree
i don't think that sando was going to get lynched because brass correctly said that sando doesn't agree to have all three scum pick the same number; if anything he was pointing out a reason to not-scumread his draftpick.In post 380, BuJaber wrote:If there's another option please enlighten me. But basically A and B suck for scum. They will likely bring a lot of suspicion on them. The person with the meta read would definitely pursue it at a minimum even if others ignore it.And judging by past games if a past game is linked to prove that the scum player does play the way the town player suggested then that is probably going to end up lynching the scum.
In post 387, OkaPoka wrote:im going to actually have to agree here with the folks on the enigma wagon that enigma's refusal to take his semi-rvs vote off or make a case against bujaber is fishy. furthermore enigma's admission to not really scumhunting is throwing me for a loop here, we are 16 pages in soo
ok, which is it?In post 392, OkaPoka wrote:enigma is town because how the wagon formed is scummy as hell
i think you're scumreading him for having a differece in playstyle from you and not for anything like actually ai imo.In post 389, BuJaber wrote:Then we fundamentally disagree. Ignoring it is terrible.
Also why do people always do that with me. Just because you are claiming I have misread you doesn't mean you have to disagree with every point I make.
I'm right about this. And you agreeing with me about it doesn't automatically make you scum.
he's answering the following question from bujaber; i don't think this post announces a change in positionIn post 416, Sando wrote:What changed between 392 and now?In post 415, OkaPoka wrote:svs is engima scum and enigma wagon is also scum
--In post 414, BuJaber wrote:When y'all are saying SvS you mean scum is on the enigma wagon and enigma is scum?
a) so things like the bolded are low-key making me think you're trying to buddy me tbhIn post 428, BuJaber wrote:Skitter since I think you're town and I value your opinion, when you get to it comment on my scumpool.
I understand you don't like some of my reasoning wrt to draft picks and Sando, but I've done more sorting since then and when you take the entire process into account Sando becomes part of the pool even if by PoE only because I haven't seen enough for a TR.
And in fact the latest stuff from him is good because it's a lot more black and white. Like he is either overreacting to my lonely vote because he's town and rightfully getting offended or because he's defensive scum lashing out. Pretty much has to be one or the other unlike posting vague general stuff that is hard to intepret. Ehem ehem like a few people in this game (and on this site).
I'm hoping with more posts from her I can figure out which it is.
i would take sky out for now as i'm low-key townleaning her;In post 323, BuJaber wrote:{Vulcan, ausuka, brass, enigma, sando}
Could go either way: {AP, invisibility, skygazer}
i feel like he didn't know where to vote and he saw people voting there so he just hopped onIn post 445, Ausuka wrote:Does this really happen though? Like I don't think mafia ever think "lol i dont care enough to make up a reason so ill just hop on this wagon here lol", unless it would be odd for them specifically I think they'd just try to justify their actions. I don't think it takes much effort to make up a reason to scumread someone, especially if that player is scummy enough to get wagoned.In post 423, skitter30 wrote:really? i kinda got the vibe that he couldn't be bothered to make up a reason and that he hopped on cuz other people are doing it.
is death-tunneling a thing you usually do?In post 451, Invisibility wrote:Hi
If I don’t unvote oka now I will deathtunnle until the ends of time
I now have no scumreads
I’ll make a PoE pool when I get home
i'm really sorry to hear that and i hope that you're ok :)In post 458, brassherald wrote:@Mod my fiancee and I just broke up, I'm going to be a mess for a few days, just replace me please.
so he's one of those players that i have a hard time reading because they have a very rational playstyle that i tend to want to townread for just making sense (and like i scumread him and kinda mislynched him, oops, last game for pushing something that didn't make sense to me)In post 461, ruru wrote:@skitter/ceejay/anyone else who's played with him do you have a good read on sando yet?
Why did you pick Vulcan, the guy who you think siteflaked, here over other null reads?In post 459, Invisibility wrote:Sando - leantown
skitter30 - town
AP - null
brassherald - slight townlean
BuJaber - townlean
Ausuka - town
Skygazer - null
vulcan logician - siteflaked?
ceejayvinoya - null
ruru - townlean actually
ofrhz - town
OkaPoka - townlean
Enigma - null
{AP, Skygazer, Ceejay, Enigma, vulcan}
VOTE: vulcan logician
What do you think about 184-186 btw?In post 464, skitter30 wrote:pinging meIn post 377, AP wrote:@ruru.@Oka: Can we like.. shut this conversation about claims off?If I was scum I would have loved you both for the amount of ideas you're giving me.
P.S. I am now leaning town on Oka, I'm more inclined to believe it's his argumentative playstyle that's annoying me, but I can certainly see the town motive behind his play, and I think it bad for scum!him to do this.
UNVOTE:
Ok, not normally super big fan of lists but lets add my contribution in case I go poof...