In post 88, skitter30 wrote:@duckling:
v/la on fridays and saturdays always
--
In post 7, OkaPoka wrote:in before the mod pms us lets go
VOTE: ruru
scum has pregame chat and likely coordinated their numerical picks, having one scumbuddy go with number 1 would probably be a safe thing to do.
me + sando + ruru + duckling (+ maybe ofrhz? I don't remember) were talking about the optimal way to play the draft last week on discord (well before role PMs were given out) and she came to the conclusion that the best way to break the draft is to have a meta of always picking 1, as that way other people would avoid it so that they don't tie with you and that you get first pick as either alignment. she also made such a statement in her signup post in the queue
thus it's wholly NAI because she said she was going to do it before she got her PM
--
In post 8, Skygazer wrote:heha second post
VOTE: Oka
trying to drag us out of rvs so soon?
is that a bad thing?
--
kinda surprised you didn't comment on the ruru-1 thing above?
--
In post 12, BuJaber wrote:I think we can safely assume that no two people with the same number are scum together.
i'm pretty sure that someone said that there was a recent iteration of this where scum did just that for the wifom. honestly not going to read too much into the draft because it's basically a mess of wifom that we have no way of conclusively untangling. like it can point in certain directions - 'i think it's probably unlikely that two people with the same number are scum together' is a fair statement, but completely ruling that out by 'safely assuming' scum wouldn't have done that on page 1 i don't think is such a good idea
--
nah i asked the mice and they told me that 42 was the answer to life, the universe, and everything, and i decided the perfect time to test what insights that number could offer me was in a game where i bid to get effective super powers as i try to lynch people
really cuz i figured i could hit that sweetspot of avoiding the glut of doubled-over or tripled-over numbers but where i might end up getting vt anyways - i def like playing vt best and this way i could achieve some sort of happy medium of making a reasonable effort at getting a pr knowing there's a decent chance i wouldn't
--
In post 32, BuJaber wrote:
Is this how you normally are?
Because your tone rubs me the wrong way. I feel dismissed and belittled.
VOTE: ofrhz
i don't want to just dismiss your feelings out of hand but i kinda agree with ofrhz's sentiment and i don't think he said anything scummy here? like even if you think he was trying to dismiss and/or belittle you i'm not sure why you're finding that scummy and/or voteworthy?
--
In post 41, BuJaber wrote:Yes
My assumption is backed by reasoning.
If he/she is town who thinks my reasoning is flawed he/she could have argued his point of view.
He/she did not and simply disagreed
.
i'm still missing the part where you think this is *scummy*
--
In post 47, brassherald wrote:You need to look at the individual people and decide whether they are likely to enact a plan where they pick the same numbers.
i think that the set of people who are likely to enact such a plan != the set of people who is likely to go along with such a plan because someone else on their team suggested they would
like i think i know ofrhz reasonably(?) well and i don't think he'd pick the same number as someone else unless there was a more experienced member of the scumteam who recommended that he do so; ie i don't think he'd do that on his own but he might if someone esle says he should
sando i could see doing this for the wifom
idk cj well enough to comment either way.
i guess what i'm saying is that if this happened people who may have suggested doing it may not actually be *in* the group of potential double/triple-numbers and we shouldn't limit this sort of analysis to just that group of people
--
In post 49, Sando wrote:Anyone got a link to that PYP where scum all picked the same number?
people were saying this was a thing? I thought it was 2 same - 1 different. i really can't imagine a scumteam picking all three of the same number because i think in most games that basically locks them out of getting any PRs at all. also agree that focusing too much on the draft prob won't lead to any useufl conclusions; i think while it can and should be a factor when forming reads play >>> draft
--
In post 52, ruru wrote:ODDLY FORMAL GREETING
EXPRESSION OF SURPRISE THAT A GAME ON MAFIASCUM DOT NET WHICH WAS SCHEDULED TO START STARTED
EXCUSE FOR MISSING RVS
RVS VOTE
VOTE: AP
we're basically out of rvs here so i'm kinda surprised that you have nothing else to say beyond this
--
In post 62, OkaPoka wrote:VOTE: brassherald
gut+if orhz is correct i guess my theory might be dead in the water
i'm kinda getting townpings from brass
--
In post 66, AP wrote:VOTE: skitter
Only one besides me who hasn't posted yet.
i got kinda majorly dehydrated yesterday and am/was feeling kinda sick-ish
--
i am confused?
if you're PGO i'm not really sure why you would announce this unless you were trying to like purposefully not get visited. although if you're town i guess that's probably be the point
--
In post 79, brassherald wrote:God, I hate this right now from ruru, but what's worse is that I think it's town because there is no scum motivation in it that I can think of. It's too obvious.
this is really, really out-of-character from town!ruru in my expereince. but i also can't imagine her doing this as scum; i don't think she has a high enough degree of confidence in her scumgame to play like this
--
yay real time
Its me !!!!! https://www.instagram.com/iamcardib
Its me !!!!! https://www.instagram.com/iamcardib
