Lynch the Wolves (Game Over)

Nosferatu · Post Post #3850 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:18 pm

VOTE: muffin

Brian Skies · Post Post #3851 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:19 pm

Was that just a hammer?

Did I put Muffin to L-1?

Why did I think this game was larger than it actually is?

Oath · Post Post #3852 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:22 pm

ugH Brian you are scumz aren't you? I already knew Nos was...

Oath · Post Post #3853 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:22 pm

I had hope. That actually hurts my feelings.

Nosferatu · Post Post #3854 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:24 pm

was it l-1?

fuck me if this is the 2nd game in a row that i accidentally hammer

Brian Skies · Post Post #3855 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:24 pm

The game is probably not going to end from this lynch, so I have no idea why you're suddenly accusing us of being quickhammering scum (especially since my vote was there for a while and I had no idea it was even at L-1).

Nosferatu · Post Post #3856 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:25 pm

no ok its L-1 right now

Brian Skies · Post Post #3857 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:25 pm

Unvote: Muffin

It was a false alarm guys.

We can all thank Gamma later.

I thought there was a reason I didn't think Muffin was at L-1 before.

Nosferatu · Post Post #3858 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:26 pm

In post 3852, Oath wrote:ugH Brian you are scumz aren't you? I already knew Nos was...

you'd be wrong twice my guy

Vecna · Post Post #3859 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 8:41 pm

In post 3808, Oath wrote:
In post 3805, Vecna wrote:Who did you RB last night Oath?
hebichan but it was unsuccessful

Wait WHAT?

How does your ability work?

Because hebichan said she got a result on me, ergo using an ability.

UNVOTE: Zmuffin

Oath · Post Post #3860 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 8:43 pm

In post 3859, Vecna wrote:
In post 3808, Oath wrote:
In post 3805, Vecna wrote:Who did you RB last night Oath?
hebichan but it was unsuccessful
Wait WHAT?

How does your ability work?

Because hebichan said she got a result on me, ergo using an ability.

UNVOTE: Zmuffin

Obviously there was a protective role on hebi last night. No point in them claiming, but that is the only thing that makes sense.

zMuffinMan · Post Post #3861 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 8:51 pm

@brian

why do you think mathblade and creature can't be scum together?

hebichan · Post Post #3862 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:47 pm

A protective role that stops roleblocks?

Oath · Post Post #3863 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2018 11:49 pm

In post 3862, hebichan wrote:A protective role that stops roleblocks?

I was thinking more along the lines of absorbing it. I obviously can't be sure. I just get the result that it was unsuccessful. The mod doesn't say because so-and-so did such-and-such on hebi, obviously.

MathBlade · Post Post #3864 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2018 2:02 am

In post 3830, Oath wrote:To be fair it doesn't tell me anything except that I was "unsuccessful" or "did not receive abilities" when I fail in either. It doesn't say why- so that doesn't mean it's not true. The verfication really only comes if I'm successful.

The only reason I feel like I succeeded in my target of Aronis and fulfilled my condition is because they breadcrumbed feeling lethargic - also mind you, my predecessor was the one who targeted Aronis. I just received the info after replacing in.

P-edit: Um... why would I? I had no reason to think he had any abilities. Unless I missed a claim?

What condition is that?

You said your wincon is exactly the same as town?

MathBlade · Post Post #3865 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2018 2:05 am

In post 3862, hebichan wrote:A protective role that stops roleblocks?

Rolestopper would fit the bill except then Oath wouldn’t have drained Hebi successfully. As he supposedly said he did.

Did you get a lethargy message hebi?

And why would town have another protective after a jailkeep?

Is it possible scum don’t have a PT this game?

Ankamius · Post Post #3866 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2018 2:09 am

I doubt that

It's entirely possible there are scum without PT access, though.

HeWhoSwims · Post Post #3867 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2018 3:28 am

Traitor could easily happen to fault PT cop

I find this whole oath thing to be wacky as fuck. Why would you try to drain Hebi. A pretty valuable asset. Who's pretty townread I think. Plus rolestopper... Would a rolestopper block kills ?

Titus · Post Post #3868 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2018 4:17 am

In post 3867, HeWhoSwims wrote:Traitor could easily happen to fault PT cop

I find this whole oath thing to be wacky as fuck. Why would you try to drain Hebi. A pretty valuable asset. Who's pretty townread I think. Plus rolestopper... Would a rolestopper block kills ?

Probably would.

Titus · Post Post #3869 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2018 4:18 am

In post 3867, HeWhoSwims wrote:Traitor could easily happen to fault PT cop

I find this whole oath thing to be wacky as fuck. Why would you try to drain Hebi. A pretty valuable asset. Who's pretty townread I think. Plus rolestopper... Would a rolestopper block kills ?

But if we infer a traitor then Hebi's clears are not clears at all...

Titus · Post Post #3870 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2018 4:20 am

Math argues to shoot Oath to eliminate a protective unaware of his traitor status. Oath blocks a kill on Hebichan unwittingly foiling scum. Zmuffin, desperate, attempts to CC Hebi.

That's my current theory.

zMuffinMan · Post Post #3871 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2018 4:29 am

i didnt counter-claim anyone

i claimed my role

derps like you think it conflicts with hebi's - it doesn't

zMuffinMan · Post Post #3872 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2018 4:31 am

In post 3869, Titus wrote:But if we infer a traitor then Hebi's clears are not clears at all

so insightful

HeWhoSwims · Post Post #3873 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2018 5:19 am

Wait when is Oath a protective

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #3874 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2018 6:53 am

In post 3808, Oath wrote:
In post 3805, Vecna wrote:Who did you RB last night Oath?
hebichan but it was unsuccessful

EW WHY

VOTE: Oath