with 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
day one will end in (expired on 2018-08-05 09:00:00)
- skitter30 v/la Fridays & Saturdays
- quack
lol.In post 1118, ofrhz wrote:.................lolIn post 1111, OkaPoka wrote:every other post orfhz makes me want to lynch him/her and the other half makes me think obv!town
go take it up with the mod. there aren't supposed to be any mid-game alignment changes in this setup
i realized after i posted about the irl stuff that people might think that i was trying to use that as an excuse or something since the timing coincided with me being pushed, which was not my intention. i wasn't trying to get people to give me a pass or anything or to gain an advantage, but kinda just saying why posting was hard for me just then and nowish still in a very general sense, not localized to what was happening in this game.In post 1123, Sando wrote:Skitter is outside her town-play, but I don't know whether to put that down to IRL issues or scum. I very much doubt Skitter would ever use IRL as an excuse for in-game advantage in being read, so I think I'm happy for her to carry that question mark for a while and judge later.
so i still don't think his meta was ever really townie here; it actually reminds me a lot of jungle republic where he active-lurked by posting jokes and setup spec and memes; here he hasn't really posted content or pushed anyone or really done anything besides hammering vizzy. he's just kinda here and around and like i don't know what he's thinking about anything this game tbhIn post 1123, Sando wrote:Hmmm, my 3 favourite wagons are all going at the same time. I think, surprisingly, I'm gonna jump on the AP wagon. I felt D1 was pretty town from AP meta-wise, but not so much with the D2. The posts are markedly less content driven and they're also skirting the edge of misinformation with the PGO/Vig hypothesising.
I think bottom up claim is bad for town, I can explain this more in depth, but just want to put out there that while it looks tempting, I think in this circumstance it may hurt town.In post 1134, OkaPoka wrote:wanna just do a role call bottom up with these lads?
Oh, cool, yeah I think a CC is in order if available.In post 1140, Skygazer wrote:The thing is Ausuka and I thought someone else was likely doctor for reasons so I'm waiting to see if there's a cc
i mean we have the people who theoretically be the pgo/vig slot claim from bottom up so we can isolate who has whatIn post 1136, Sando wrote:I think bottom up claim is bad for town, I can explain this more in depth, but just want to put out there that while it looks tempting, I think in this circumstance it may hurt town.In post 1134, OkaPoka wrote:wanna just do a role call bottom up with these lads?
In post 932, AP wrote:I am one to claim I perfectly understand ruru's gambit (and I acknowledge I did from the very start too).In post 908, BuJaber wrote:-Can someone help me understand what ruru's strategy was? I don't get the town fakeclaim. A townie who knows she's lying will counterclaim and ruru likely gets lynched. And scum who know she's lying will NK her. And I think that's what happened. It's the most likely explanation in my mind.
First off; PGO/1-shot Vig is rarely ever picked anyway, much less so by the #1 draft. ruru obviously was claiming a strong TPR that needed to try and evade the NK. If a Townie had the role they would not have CC'd if they knew what they were doing (and/ot if they knew ruru well enough). Scum would have also known she was lying if they did have the role, so I'm slightly leaning they do, but not ruling out someone in the scum team knows ruru well enough and called her bluff.
Uggg these two above posts tick me off following the claim. You knew ruru's gambit (how were you so sure?), and took a big risk (which failed) by not targeting her (would you not assume if she was lying, there was a good probability this would happen with the scum knowing she was lying by their drafts)...In post 945, AP wrote:Trust me, if I was scum with him I would've instructed him to claim COP to bait a CC before we lynched him.In post 936, Enigma wrote:In post 931, AP wrote:I mistook CJV's vote for an Invis self-vote, which in my mind translated to either scum gambitting to look like they didn't care or a VT (in which case it was still a better lynch than one that leads to a TPR claim).In post 908, BuJaber wrote:- AP: why did you hammer?
Obviously ot was a mistake but one that paid off anyway, so I'm not sorry.This is hard to believe. A townie (playing invs style) could put themselves at L-1 regardless of PR or VT, so it is a weak excuse here. For someone who took the time to deliberate voting me, it seems awfully convenient to slip accidentally on the invs wagon for the town cred. Invs was 90% sure to be lynched at that stage anyways ... a bit of LAMIST.In post 351, AP wrote:Hint: You better amuse me, cuz I actually typed the vote then decided not to put you @L-1 now
Can someone interpret this for me? Is he saying Sky is town or scum?In post 766, AP wrote:Seriously though
ruru is 100% town to me.
ofrhz and Oka are next level town
I think Enigma might be town
Everyone else is more or less "in the mix", and while I don't have an explicit scum read yet I might be inclined to pressure the lower numbers (outside of those I think are town already), so Sky > Vulcan > Vizzy > Skitter ... etc
Here I read it as he is unsure of Sky being town, yet he protected her?? And then zero comment on the whole neighbour issue?In post 767, AP wrote:There are pros and cons to everyone playing how they play having picked what they picked as either alignment.In post 765, Ausuka wrote:AP what are your reads?
That is to say, I can see Sky playing the way she does as either alignment, and it's almost a given she got her PR of choice regardless of her alignment. (Unless she sent for Vig/PGO ) and so on. In the previous run of this setup I did try a similar approach and it backfired because I assumed those who picked the lowest numbers were scum and those who had duplicate picks had one scum in then at most .. etc, which made my reads based on the draft numbers alone a mess.
Oh wait, Aus has claimed they picked Vig/PGO right? I was concerned we'd get to top slots and have no-one having claimed it. Yeah bottom up not bad if we decide to mass-claim, my bad.In post 1142, OkaPoka wrote:i mean we have the people who theoretically be the pgo/vig slot claim from bottom up so we can isolate who has what
we go bottom up because if someone claims vt, we ask for the submitted role and then we can verify by other claims
only problem is scum knows some roles already in the top for vt fakeclaims
If AP could be scum, you still think there is a scum above Ausuka? I.e. in Skitter or vulcan?In post 1133, OkaPoka wrote:ap still might be scum because thats the rb slot
but
there is one other scum in here that we have to find
VOTE: skitter30
AP being scum would mean AP is most likely RB and scum could have safely killed ruru through PGO without caring about the fakeclaim aspect of that. That means Vig doesn't necessarily have to be scum. Given that Vig hasn't claimed and no-one seems to disagree with my Town-Vig = AP-scum theory, I think vig is most likely scum, and in Aus/Skitter/Vulcan.In post 1145, Enigma wrote:If AP could be scum, you still think there is a scum above Ausuka? I.e. in Skitter or vulcan?In post 1133, OkaPoka wrote:ap still might be scum because thats the rb slot
but
there is one other scum in here that we have to find
VOTE: skitter30