In post 616, Garmr wrote:
I want to lynch gustavo but i'm not sure if it's his polar opposite game style making me bias and not caring if his town or the fact his really scum.
Honestly I feel like the reason so many people have clashed with Gustavo has been clashing personalities/playstyles
In post 618, Garmr wrote:
Now then let's start with one person we should rule out and another who's I can personally rule out.
Goldren Robster
- Now I see people going "she must be scum if garmrs town" or saying "one of us must be scum as she hard defended me." But this is really flawed logic and the problem people have with her is "it doesn't make sense from town."
Since I know I'm town and was under the fire of a mislynch at the time the majority of people wouldn't bat a eyelid if golden put a vote on me, especially since it looked like she might of scum read me before when she called me out for chainsawing. Also what benefit does it bring to scum to stop a potential mislynch. Also gustavo would be under fire tomorrow after my town flip with the mentality of this player base. Plus golden robster was in a good position before they defended me. They didn't need to make a gambit to try and look town. This appears to me as a town read cranked up to the extreme.
Going to be honest I don't think I deserve this extreme town read. But this extreme reactions makes more sense coming from town and not from scum, as scum have more information and less to gain from this; The objective for them is staying alive, while town can win by getting rid of scum. If scum were to try and get town cred from defending me, they would do it in a way that doesn't interrupt my lynch to much.
I personally can't see that level of extreme defence of a town read coming from a townie on d1, that sort of confidence is the sort of thing I'd expect from someone with knowledge a normal townie wouldn't have, and I don't think we have any PRs that would already have that knowledge so the only options I see are GR was either scum trying to use you to gain towncred or scum protecting her partner. The execution for both of these things wasn't great but that doesn't automatically mean it can't have been from scum
In post 635, Garmr wrote: In post 632, Gustavo wrote: In post 630, Garmr wrote:Can I say something. You are acting really arrogant here
Hypocrite
So you can scum read me for asking questions you think are pointless but I think one of yours is pointless and that’s why people hate playing with me?
Get lost
Word it this way. You asked questions, some were redundant, Nearly all You never followed up on them,You didn't use the answers in a case and you didn't show how they affected your read latter on. Since people can't read your mind they seem like throwaway questions. When I pressed you on it you could of showed why you asked them and what effect they had. This would of helped me and maybe others reading in on our conversation your mind set at the time. Instead you basically go herp da derp you are scum I don't have to answer you.
^This was a case for you being scum. You could of easily proven me wrong on this one by showing that your questions were useful and what you got out of them.
I was asking for reads which is information that everyone can use. The answer you gave me was basically "you'll be dead soon anyway why do I have to bother"
^This is dickish and doesn't help town at all. It's a different scenario from the one above
Also
Red text of truth: my frustration was genuine and I did ask the mod to replace out, they gave me time to cool my head by asking if I was sure. You can decide if that frustration comes from a town or scum player
I'm trying to make up for my over reaction by playing to the best of my ability because I feel guilty for asking to replace out.
Still don't townread you but I don't think scum who'd faked getting frustrated and wanting to replace out would lie about having communications with the mod about it so I don't doubt that your frustration was definitely real now
In post 636, Garmr wrote:7. The Mafia use day talk in this game. If other private threads exist, they use day talk as well
Fuck didn't notice that.
This is quite important information that I didn't notice until now either.
In post 643, Gustavo wrote:UNVOTE:
My vote in theory is on garmr. My original plan this game wasn’t to tunnel but I don’t consider this tunneling since he’s been the largest wagon.
I’ll hammer whoever of garmr/rob gets to l-1.
Now people can stop talking to me since I annoy everyone and start talking to each other.
Maybe gamma/pop/Hiraki will respond to somebody else asking them my questions.
v/la until Wednesday
I’ve got a very busy next couple of days at work. No time to “circle jerk” on mafia websites.
P.edit - wrong/misrep? Who knows but that’s my honest interpretation on how I see it.
Have a nice life.
On one hand your interactions with other players have definitely dominated this game until now and having that stop might allow for more chances to see how everyone interacts with each other but at the same time I hope you don't feel like you have to keep silent even after you're done with work
In post 647, popopopopopopo wrote:gustavo - garmr i think is town vs town
James had pressure on him early and has pretty much disappeared and been able to fly under the radar since that early pressure, so i still heavily scum read him
gamma is a big scum read of mine also
ive been at a wedding this weekend but im flyng back to the us tomorrow so hopefully i will be able to dedicate a bit more effort to this game this week
Can you explain why you think Garmr v Gustavo is TvT?
Why the scum read on Gamma?
What is this about?
In post 666, BuJaber wrote:Music has been on and off VLA for a while now across site. So it sucks that they're not here but we know the reason.
Where the heck is Kop?
Kop was replaced by Hiraki
In post 675, Krazy wrote: In post 656, BuJaber wrote: In post 654, Krazy wrote:I do not understand why rob is on the table with 2 claims.
I don't understand?
Garmr claimed VT and gustavo claimed JOAT. What does that have to do with Rob?
In what world does it make sense to take 3 claims on d1? It has nothing to do with Rob outside of the fact that Rob hasn't claimed.
There was nothing in Garmr's claim that should have made people re-evaluate, other than a bunch of NAI AtE. Yet somehow he has managed to out a TPR before going down. And now you want to out another claim.
Does it really matter that much if we get another claim?
Garmr didn't out a TPR, Gus outed himself.