Mini 2014: Succinct Mafia (Over)
-
-
Dunnstral he/himGoodfellashe/him
- Goodfellas
- Goodfellas
- Posts: 40581
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
MathBlade He/HimTechnical SupportHe/Him
- Technical Support
- Technical Support
- Posts: 42761
- Joined: September 9, 2013
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Western US
This argument makes 0 sense with an encryptor in playIn post 1174, Hiraki wrote:
They read bad in post-sight. I might've called them good before but there's something I didn't really get about them. That had a lot to do with how Lucky had Eevee and Pine pinned as scum together. I never ever got that feeling and we agreed on reads there. I think Wisdom even called me out on this and I just said I dunno.In post 1172, LuckyOtter wrote:@Hiraki, K. Yesterday you said you didn't like some of Dunn's phrasings. Can you clarify that with examples?
When, at the same time:In post 957, Dunnstral wrote:Pine you need to get on eevee
In post 495, Dunnstral wrote:
Seems like a scum on scum interaction to me - eevee with pineIn post 494, LuckyOtter wrote:2. Earlier in the game I'd disagree with this, but given the state of the game now, this is correct. Just sticking a single vote on someone when there are 2 or 3 other wagons going, the proponents of which aren't budging very much, is not going to go anywhere and Eevee must know this.
If Eevee actually proposed any kind of case for pushing Pine, I'd feel better about it.In post 542, Dunnstral wrote:I get the feeling that Fuzzy is town, also I don't like seeing pine and sircakez on there
It's only after they CC that this theory (obviously) drops but it's weird in hindsight. There's really no reason to push it this hard. Which is something to note when the CC does happen -In post 730, Dunnstral wrote:
Why does that mean it wasn't pine specifically?In post 725, EeveeLution Army wrote:1) cause honestly i dont see why mom got killed at all
Weird that you said this but now can't back it up or even explain your thought process here
I don't get where this shift comes from.In post 986, Dunnstral wrote:
Now stop with the counter wagons and get on eeveeIn post 969, Pine wrote:I'm the doctor. Back offScumBlade's eloquent performance left me utterly disoriented, debased, depraved and sent me spiraling into a horrific murky abyss with emotional turmoil and immense despair as my only companions until slowly I suffocate in my own gloom, surrounded by failure. I will never recover. -- Zachstralkita about Mini 1841
GTKAS -- MathBlade-
-
TrinityNZ Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 301
- Joined: June 12, 2018
- Location: New Zealand
-
-
TrinityNZ Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 301
- Joined: June 12, 2018
- Location: New Zealand
What do you all think? Does this sound like a plan?
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
No, I thought about this too. Go on with that thought.In post 1176, MathBlade wrote:
This argument makes 0 sense with an encryptor in playIn post 1174, Hiraki wrote:
They read bad in post-sight. I might've called them good before but there's something I didn't really get about them. That had a lot to do with how Lucky had Eevee and Pine pinned as scum together. I never ever got that feeling and we agreed on reads there. I think Wisdom even called me out on this and I just said I dunno.In post 1172, LuckyOtter wrote:@Hiraki, K. Yesterday you said you didn't like some of Dunn's phrasings. Can you clarify that with examples?
When, at the same time:In post 957, Dunnstral wrote:Pine you need to get on eevee
In post 495, Dunnstral wrote:
Seems like a scum on scum interaction to me - eevee with pineIn post 494, LuckyOtter wrote:2. Earlier in the game I'd disagree with this, but given the state of the game now, this is correct. Just sticking a single vote on someone when there are 2 or 3 other wagons going, the proponents of which aren't budging very much, is not going to go anywhere and Eevee must know this.
If Eevee actually proposed any kind of case for pushing Pine, I'd feel better about it.In post 542, Dunnstral wrote:I get the feeling that Fuzzy is town, also I don't like seeing pine and sircakez on there
It's only after they CC that this theory (obviously) drops but it's weird in hindsight. There's really no reason to push it this hard. Which is something to note when the CC does happen -In post 730, Dunnstral wrote:
Why does that mean it wasn't pine specifically?In post 725, EeveeLution Army wrote:1) cause honestly i dont see why mom got killed at all
Weird that you said this but now can't back it up or even explain your thought process here
I don't get where this shift comes from.In post 986, Dunnstral wrote:
Now stop with the counter wagons and get on eeveeIn post 969, Pine wrote:I'm the doctor. Back off-
-
MathBlade He/HimTechnical SupportHe/Him
- Technical Support
- Technical Support
- Posts: 42761
- Joined: September 9, 2013
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Western US
I did. Your argument makes no sense. So pretend like I am five and explain it to me.
Trinity Jingle still looks good. Hiraki I dunno.
I really wanna see how Jingle responds here.ScumBlade's eloquent performance left me utterly disoriented, debased, depraved and sent me spiraling into a horrific murky abyss with emotional turmoil and immense despair as my only companions until slowly I suffocate in my own gloom, surrounded by failure. I will never recover. -- Zachstralkita about Mini 1841
GTKAS -- MathBlade-
-
LuckyOtter Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 794
- Joined: May 24, 2018
- Location: North Carolina
Dunn, what are your reads?
Are you implying that you think this is the plan to follow or are you asking for direction here?
Like I said, that's the easiest answer. It aligns with both Umlaut's and Wisdom's thoughts. I have expressed my doubts about those two as scum, and about you and Dunn as town, but since I'm still here and both Umlaut and Wisdom are gone, I'm willing to assume that at least one of my reads here is off, possibly all of them.
--
I am not following either Math or Hiraki here.
So scum!Dunn is distancing from Pine and pushing for Eevee lynch saying both are scum. Dunn knows Pine is going to claim (via encryptor), which is going to allow him to go after Eevee, again. So he can comfortably vote Pine for a bit knowing he's going to get to go back to voting Eevee.
Or, town!Dunn legit believes both Pine and Eevee are scum, and does some digging into that line of thought. After the claims, he has to decide which is scum and chooses Eevee, presumably because Eevee was the stronger scumread from the beginning (which he just said, and reading his ISO checks out)
Either scenario seems plausible to me and I don't see how the encryptor in play changes things.-
-
MathBlade He/HimTechnical SupportHe/Him
- Technical Support
- Technical Support
- Posts: 42761
- Joined: September 9, 2013
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Western US
With an encryptor in play scum has zero reason to tell a buddyIn post 1181, LuckyOtter wrote:Dunn, what are your reads?
Are you implying that you think this is the plan to follow or are you asking for direction here?
Like I said, that's the easiest answer. It aligns with both Umlaut's and Wisdom's thoughts. I have expressed my doubts about those two as scum, and about you and Dunn as town, but since I'm still here and both Umlaut and Wisdom are gone, I'm willing to assume that at least one of my reads here is off, possibly all of them.
--
I am not following either Math or Hiraki here.
So scum!Dunn is distancing from Pine and pushing for Eevee lynch saying both are scum. Dunn knows Pine is going to claim (via encryptor), which is going to allow him to go after Eevee, again. So he can comfortably vote Pine for a bit knowing he's going to get to go back to voting Eevee.
Or, town!Dunn legit believes both Pine and Eevee are scum, and does some digging into that line of thought. After the claims, he has to decide which is scum and chooses Eevee, presumably because Eevee was the stronger scumread from the beginning (which he just said, and reading his ISO checks out)
Either scenario seems plausible to me and I don't see how the encryptor in play changes things.
“Partner you need to do <x>” they say it in the daychat.
Hiraki’s argument that scum!Dunnstral would openly say his buddy needs to change votes in the game thread is sillyScumBlade's eloquent performance left me utterly disoriented, debased, depraved and sent me spiraling into a horrific murky abyss with emotional turmoil and immense despair as my only companions until slowly I suffocate in my own gloom, surrounded by failure. I will never recover. -- Zachstralkita about Mini 1841
GTKAS -- MathBlade-
-
Jingle For Whom the Bell Trolls
- For Whom the Bell Trolls
- For Whom the Bell Trolls
- Posts: 15212
- Joined: July 17, 2013
- Location: Texas
Counter-argument:In post 1173, MathBlade wrote:
viewtopic.php?p=10176950#p10176950In post 1170, Jingle wrote:
I recognize all of these as English words.In post 1168, MathBlade wrote:What’s the proper strategy here Jingle?
I recognize that together those words form a sentence.
I don't recognize that sentence as having any meaning at all in the context of this game, and would appreciate translation.
I await your mysterious scumtell, preferably sooner than later, so that I can tell if you're blowing smoke up my ass or just hilariously wrong.
And for the record, I have read the thread at this point.
@LO: What?
The place where your scum tell exists.
You said you had to be lynched before Mylo. I scumread you. You’re following a scum tell.
You need to die.
What are your reads in more detail?
Grey Flag Geriatric Game.
I do need to die.
I'm working on them as we speak. When I'm ready, I'll talk about them, but until then I'd like to engage with the players in thread and refine them. I only get the one shot at this, and my read so far is that scum is rather unworried by the gamestate. That means I need to be thorough. We have the time to play solve the thread, so I'm going to work on solving the thread.
False Dichotomy.In post 1172, LuckyOtter wrote:@Jingle, if you've read the thread, there should be no confusion at this point
Let's phrase this a different way then. Why does it make any sense for me to be specifically a likely scumpartner to someone on the basis that I was attempting to engage a townread about their suspicion on that player? Specifically, what is the logical reason that leads you to the partner conclusion based on me replacing in and asking someone to talk MORE about why a particular player is scum, especially after I have already expressed that I cannot be allowed to survive into LYLO?
Normally, I'd say a week is the limit and you should ask for a replacement. In this particular case, I happen to know that mastina has been having some issues finding replacements and it might just be best to stay in it.In post 1177, TrinityNZ wrote:Hey I’m really sorry, I’m going on holiday to Rarotonga on Saturday for a week, and probably won’t have internet. Is it best to go on V/LA or ask for a replacement? I thought the game wouldn’t last this long.
I'd be fine with letting you go V/LA that long given the relaxed nature of this game, but you might also consider telling mastina that you are requesting replacement, but that if your slot is still vacant when you return you'd be happy to resume playing in it. That way the game isn't stalled on your account if it would otherwise have been progressing, but she doesn't have to deal with as much pressure searching for a replacement for your slot would normally cause.This is a Parachute.-
-
LuckyOtter Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 794
- Joined: May 24, 2018
- Location: North Carolina
@Math, right, but is that what he's arguing? Actually, let's let Hiraki answer that.
--
It's not, really. Both Umlaut and Wisdom had you and Hiraki as Pine buddies. They are both dead. The easy answer to this is you and Hiraki are scum. That doesn't make it the right answer, but it's the easy answer and you should be well aware of this if you've read the thread. I believe you've read the thread, just not that you are confused about why people are putting you and Hiraki together.In post 1183, Jingle wrote:
False Dichotomy.In post 1172, LuckyOtter wrote:@Jingle, if you've read the thread, there should be no confusion at this point
On a purely gut level, your asking Wisdom about Hiraki reads a tad defensive and disingenuous to me. Wisdom already said he was pretty much following Umlaut on that, so that much should have been clear to you. It read to me as challenging Wisdom, not engaging him to elaborate. I could be wrong there but you are clearly not a minimalist poster so a short "Why Hiraki" doesn't seem likely to be genuinely engaging from you.Let's phrase this a different way then. Why does it make any sense for me to be specifically a likely scumpartner to someone on the basis that I was attempting to engage a townread about their suspicion on that player? Specifically, what is the logical reason that leads you to the partner conclusion based on me replacing in and asking someone to talk MORE about why a particular player is scum, especially after I have already expressed that I cannot be allowed to survive into LYLO?
Regardless, the more important thing here is that you seem to be implying that it wouldn't make any sense for scum!you to ask Wisdom to elaborate on his scumread of scum!Hiraki. Why not? For one thing, it would make perfect sense if the goal is to distance yourself from Hiraki. I mean, here you are saying "why would I do this to my partner?', so in the event of your lynch, you would hope that we'd say "well he probably wasn't trying to put that much attention on his partner, so it can't be Hiraki."
For another thing, I'd think Wisdom giving a really vague but determined scumread on your partner would be really scary for you as scum. There's no chance to reason with him and he has potential to be very influential on the town, so getting Wisdom to elaborate on his scumread would give both you and Hiraki a chance to refute some points and diffuse suspicion (if not for Wisdom, then for the rest of the town). Whether or not you are present to do so is irrelevant. The fact that you didn't get this from Wisdom, saw that he was consistently giving vague reads over the game and wasn't likely going to be engaging you or Hiraki in any sort of 1v1 that would be beneficial to you or especially Hiraki in endgame makes his NK make perfect sense in this scenario.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Pine didn't care even a little about this game. You think he really checked a PT over the thread?In post 1182, MathBlade wrote:
With an encryptor in play scum has zero reason to tell a buddyIn post 1181, LuckyOtter wrote:Dunn, what are your reads?
Are you implying that you think this is the plan to follow or are you asking for direction here?
Like I said, that's the easiest answer. It aligns with both Umlaut's and Wisdom's thoughts. I have expressed my doubts about those two as scum, and about you and Dunn as town, but since I'm still here and both Umlaut and Wisdom are gone, I'm willing to assume that at least one of my reads here is off, possibly all of them.
--
I am not following either Math or Hiraki here.
So scum!Dunn is distancing from Pine and pushing for Eevee lynch saying both are scum. Dunn knows Pine is going to claim (via encryptor), which is going to allow him to go after Eevee, again. So he can comfortably vote Pine for a bit knowing he's going to get to go back to voting Eevee.
Or, town!Dunn legit believes both Pine and Eevee are scum, and does some digging into that line of thought. After the claims, he has to decide which is scum and chooses Eevee, presumably because Eevee was the stronger scumread from the beginning (which he just said, and reading his ISO checks out)
Either scenario seems plausible to me and I don't see how the encryptor in play changes things.
“Partner you need to do <x>” they say it in the daychat.
Hiraki’s argument that scum!Dunnstral would openly say his buddy needs to change votes in the game thread is silly-
-
TrinityNZ Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 301
- Joined: June 12, 2018
- Location: New Zealand
I think it’s the plan.In post 1185, Hiraki wrote:
Pine didn't care even a little about this game. You think he really checked a PT over the thread?In post 1182, MathBlade wrote:
With an encryptor in play scum has zero reason to tell a buddyIn post 1181, LuckyOtter wrote:Dunn, what are your reads?
Are you implying that you think this is the plan to follow or are you asking for direction here?
Like I said, that's the easiest answer. It aligns with both Umlaut's and Wisdom's thoughts. I have expressed my doubts about those two as scum, and about you and Dunn as town, but since I'm still here and both Umlaut and Wisdom are gone, I'm willing to assume that at least one of my reads here is off, possibly all of them.
--
I am not following either Math or Hiraki here.
So scum!Dunn is distancing from Pine and pushing for Eevee lynch saying both are scum. Dunn knows Pine is going to claim (via encryptor), which is going to allow him to go after Eevee, again. So he can comfortably vote Pine for a bit knowing he's going to get to go back to voting Eevee.
Or, town!Dunn legit believes both Pine and Eevee are scum, and does some digging into that line of thought. After the claims, he has to decide which is scum and chooses Eevee, presumably because Eevee was the stronger scumread from the beginning (which he just said, and reading his ISO checks out)
Either scenario seems plausible to me and I don't see how the encryptor in play changes things.
“Partner you need to do <x>” they say it in the daychat.
Hiraki’s argument that scum!Dunnstral would openly say his buddy needs to change votes in the game thread is silly
I’ll vote now before I disappear.
VOTE: jingle-
-
MathBlade He/HimTechnical SupportHe/Him
- Technical Support
- Technical Support
- Posts: 42761
- Joined: September 9, 2013
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Western US
VOTE: UnvoteIn post 1183, Jingle wrote:
Counter-argument:In post 1173, MathBlade wrote:
viewtopic.php?p=10176950#p10176950In post 1170, Jingle wrote:
I recognize all of these as English words.In post 1168, MathBlade wrote:What’s the proper strategy here Jingle?
I recognize that together those words form a sentence.
I don't recognize that sentence as having any meaning at all in the context of this game, and would appreciate translation.
I await your mysterious scumtell, preferably sooner than later, so that I can tell if you're blowing smoke up my ass or just hilariously wrong.
And for the record, I have read the thread at this point.
@LO: What?
The place where your scum tell exists.
You said you had to be lynched before Mylo. I scumread you. You’re following a scum tell.
You need to die.
What are your reads in more detail?
Grey Flag Geriatric Game.
I do need to die.
I'm working on them as we speak. When I'm ready, I'll talk about them, but until then I'd like to engage with the players in thread and refine them. I only get the one shot at this, and my read so far is that scum is rather unworried by the gamestate. That means I need to be thorough. We have the time to play solve the thread, so I'm going to work on solving the thread.
False Dichotomy.In post 1172, LuckyOtter wrote:@Jingle, if you've read the thread, there should be no confusion at this point
Let's phrase this a different way then. Why does it make any sense for me to be specifically a likely scumpartner to someone on the basis that I was attempting to engage a townread about their suspicion on that player? Specifically, what is the logical reason that leads you to the partner conclusion based on me replacing in and asking someone to talk MORE about why a particular player is scum, especially after I have already expressed that I cannot be allowed to survive into LYLO?
Normally, I'd say a week is the limit and you should ask for a replacement. In this particular case, I happen to know that mastina has been having some issues finding replacements and it might just be best to stay in it.In post 1177, TrinityNZ wrote:Hey I’m really sorry, I’m going on holiday to Rarotonga on Saturday for a week, and probably won’t have internet. Is it best to go on V/LA or ask for a replacement? I thought the game wouldn’t last this long.
I'd be fine with letting you go V/LA that long given the relaxed nature of this game, but you might also consider telling mastina that you are requesting replacement, but that if your slot is still vacant when you return you'd be happy to resume playing in it. That way the game isn't stalled on your account if it would otherwise have been progressing, but she doesn't have to deal with as much pressure searching for a replacement for your slot would normally cause.
Spiritually my vote is still here but I would love for you to keep sharing reads.ScumBlade's eloquent performance left me utterly disoriented, debased, depraved and sent me spiraling into a horrific murky abyss with emotional turmoil and immense despair as my only companions until slowly I suffocate in my own gloom, surrounded by failure. I will never recover. -- Zachstralkita about Mini 1841
GTKAS -- MathBlade-
-
Jingle For Whom the Bell Trolls
- For Whom the Bell Trolls
- For Whom the Bell Trolls
- Posts: 15212
- Joined: July 17, 2013
- Location: Texas
Literally all I ask for is the space to build my reads and a town willing to consider them when I'm dead.MathBlade wrote:Spiritually my vote is still here but I would love for you to keep sharing reads.
Did you get a chance to look through that game I linked for my 'scumtell' yet?
Except that this is not the argument you made. What you did mention was a progression that lead you to think we were specifically partners.In post 1184, LuckyOtter wrote:It's not, really. Both Umlaut and Wisdom had you and Hiraki as Pine buddies. They are both dead. The easy answer to this is you and Hiraki are scum. That doesn't make it the right answer, but it's the easy answer and you should be well aware of this if you've read the thread. I believe you've read the thread, just not that you are confused about why people are putting you and Hiraki together.
A direct request for more information is "Challenging, not engaging him to elaborate"? And this on the basis that I am not a minimalist poster? So what would you expect from me as a request for more information, as opposed to a challenge?On a purely gut level, your asking Wisdom about Hiraki reads a tad defensive and disingenuous to me. Wisdom already said he was pretty much following Umlaut on that, so that much should have been clear to you. It read to me as challenging Wisdom, not engaging him to elaborate. I could be wrong there but you are clearly not a minimalist poster so a short "Why Hiraki" doesn't seem likely to be genuinely engaging from you.
The rest of your post doesn't make sense in context, btw. I asked "What leads you to the conclusion that Hiraki is my partner?" and you responded with "You asking what leads me to the conclusion that Hiraki is my partner." This is necessarily false, and therefore cannot be the answer to my question.
Further, it occurs to me you never answered my 1149. What ever came of that analysis?This is a Parachute.-
-
MathBlade He/HimTechnical SupportHe/Him
- Technical Support
- Technical Support
- Posts: 42761
- Joined: September 9, 2013
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Western US
Except by all measures he did.In post 1185, Hiraki wrote:
Pine didn't care even a little about this game. You think he really checked a PT over the thread?In post 1182, MathBlade wrote:
With an encryptor in play scum has zero reason to tell a buddyIn post 1181, LuckyOtter wrote:Dunn, what are your reads?
Are you implying that you think this is the plan to follow or are you asking for direction here?
Like I said, that's the easiest answer. It aligns with both Umlaut's and Wisdom's thoughts. I have expressed my doubts about those two as scum, and about you and Dunn as town, but since I'm still here and both Umlaut and Wisdom are gone, I'm willing to assume that at least one of my reads here is off, possibly all of them.
--
I am not following either Math or Hiraki here.
So scum!Dunn is distancing from Pine and pushing for Eevee lynch saying both are scum. Dunn knows Pine is going to claim (via encryptor), which is going to allow him to go after Eevee, again. So he can comfortably vote Pine for a bit knowing he's going to get to go back to voting Eevee.
Or, town!Dunn legit believes both Pine and Eevee are scum, and does some digging into that line of thought. After the claims, he has to decide which is scum and chooses Eevee, presumably because Eevee was the stronger scumread from the beginning (which he just said, and reading his ISO checks out)
Either scenario seems plausible to me and I don't see how the encryptor in play changes things.
“Partner you need to do <x>” they say it in the daychat.
Hiraki’s argument that scum!Dunnstral would openly say his buddy needs to change votes in the game thread is silly
He is one of the highest in post count
He fake claimed to lure out the doc
And continued posting even after being outed the next day.
These are all indications of caring.
If he was a lurker I would agree with you.
What evidence do you have that he didn’t care?ScumBlade's eloquent performance left me utterly disoriented, debased, depraved and sent me spiraling into a horrific murky abyss with emotional turmoil and immense despair as my only companions until slowly I suffocate in my own gloom, surrounded by failure. I will never recover. -- Zachstralkita about Mini 1841
GTKAS -- MathBlade-
-
MathBlade He/HimTechnical SupportHe/Him
- Technical Support
- Technical Support
- Posts: 42761
- Joined: September 9, 2013
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Western US
The other conversation aside:In post 1188, Jingle wrote:
Literally all I ask for is the space to build my reads and a town willing to consider them when I'm dead.MathBlade wrote:Spiritually my vote is still here but I would love for you to keep sharing reads.
Did you get a chance to look through that game I linked for my 'scumtell' yet?
Except that this is not the argument you made. What you did mention was a progression that lead you to think we were specifically partners.In post 1184, LuckyOtter wrote:It's not, really. Both Umlaut and Wisdom had you and Hiraki as Pine buddies. They are both dead. The easy answer to this is you and Hiraki are scum. That doesn't make it the right answer, but it's the easy answer and you should be well aware of this if you've read the thread. I believe you've read the thread, just not that you are confused about why people are putting you and Hiraki together.
A direct request for more information is "Challenging, not engaging him to elaborate"? And this on the basis that I am not a minimalist poster? So what would you expect from me as a request for more information, as opposed to a challenge?On a purely gut level, your asking Wisdom about Hiraki reads a tad defensive and disingenuous to me. Wisdom already said he was pretty much following Umlaut on that, so that much should have been clear to you. It read to me as challenging Wisdom, not engaging him to elaborate. I could be wrong there but you are clearly not a minimalist poster so a short "Why Hiraki" doesn't seem likely to be genuinely engaging from you.
The rest of your post doesn't make sense in context, btw. I asked "What leads you to the conclusion that Hiraki is my partner?" and you responded with "You asking what leads me to the conclusion that Hiraki is my partner." This is necessarily false, and therefore cannot be the answer to my question.
Further, it occurs to me you never answered my 1149. What ever came of that analysis?
What do you make of Hiraki?
And assuming you are town and I am town and Hiraki is scum who is scum with Hiraki and why?
Assuming you are town and Hiraki is town and I am town who is scum and why?
Lastly why shouldn’t I believe you are scum with Hiraki?
If you need more words than the post limit allows post <NEED A POST> and I will provide one.ScumBlade's eloquent performance left me utterly disoriented, debased, depraved and sent me spiraling into a horrific murky abyss with emotional turmoil and immense despair as my only companions until slowly I suffocate in my own gloom, surrounded by failure. I will never recover. -- Zachstralkita about Mini 1841
GTKAS -- MathBlade-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
1) Highest post count doesn't mean anything? Half of his posts are one-liners and prod dodges.In post 1189, MathBlade wrote:
Except by all measures he did.In post 1185, Hiraki wrote:
Pine didn't care even a little about this game. You think he really checked a PT over the thread?In post 1182, MathBlade wrote:
With an encryptor in play scum has zero reason to tell a buddyIn post 1181, LuckyOtter wrote:Dunn, what are your reads?
Are you implying that you think this is the plan to follow or are you asking for direction here?
Like I said, that's the easiest answer. It aligns with both Umlaut's and Wisdom's thoughts. I have expressed my doubts about those two as scum, and about you and Dunn as town, but since I'm still here and both Umlaut and Wisdom are gone, I'm willing to assume that at least one of my reads here is off, possibly all of them.
--
I am not following either Math or Hiraki here.
So scum!Dunn is distancing from Pine and pushing for Eevee lynch saying both are scum. Dunn knows Pine is going to claim (via encryptor), which is going to allow him to go after Eevee, again. So he can comfortably vote Pine for a bit knowing he's going to get to go back to voting Eevee.
Or, town!Dunn legit believes both Pine and Eevee are scum, and does some digging into that line of thought. After the claims, he has to decide which is scum and chooses Eevee, presumably because Eevee was the stronger scumread from the beginning (which he just said, and reading his ISO checks out)
Either scenario seems plausible to me and I don't see how the encryptor in play changes things.
“Partner you need to do <x>” they say it in the daychat.
Hiraki’s argument that scum!Dunnstral would openly say his buddy needs to change votes in the game thread is silly
He is one of the highest in post count
He fake claimed to lure out the doc
And continued posting even after being outed the next day.
These are all indications of caring.
If he was a lurker I would agree with you.
What evidence do you have that he didn’t care?
2) Correct, as a goon who didn't care and saw the opportunity. This isn't really a huge chess move.
3) Are you serious? He continued posting? Are you going to act like any of his posts were serious?
4) He prod dodged half of the game. I even called him out several times during the game for not caring about the game, which he responded to none of them.-
-
LuckyOtter Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 794
- Joined: May 24, 2018
- Location: North Carolina
In post 1188, Jingle wrote:
Except that this is not the argument you made. What you did mention was a progression that lead you to think we were specifically partners.In post 1184, LuckyOtter wrote:It's not, really. Both Umlaut and Wisdom had you and Hiraki as Pine buddies. They are both dead. The easy answer to this is you and Hiraki are scum. That doesn't make it the right answer, but it's the easy answer and you should be well aware of this if you've read the thread. I believe you've read the thread, just not that you are confused about why people are putting you and Hiraki together.
Here is what I said:
Note that at no point am I 100% sold on the idea that you're partners. What I'm saying is that I can see a world in which you are. Tell me what is specifically confusing you here.In post 1169, LuckyOtter wrote:Easiest answer here is Jingle+Hiraki. At least one, maybe both. Both were after Wisdom D1 as well, and I felt pretty confident then that scum was pushing that wagon. Right now I'm more confident about Jingleslot than Hiraki, though it occurs to me that Hiraki might be buddying me, and Jingle's apparent confusion over Hiraki as 3rd scum (1152) makes that pairing more likely. Still need convincing it's not Trinity, though.
So I just typed up a 385 word answer to this. The TL/DR is that you're asking someone to explain a gut read (kind of silly), this is a really minor point in my thought process, and the person you're asking is a linguist who constantly overanalyzes things like tone in text conversation, so let's all decide if it's really worth me posting this or if it will just be a distraction.
A direct request for more information is "Challenging, not engaging him to elaborate"? And this on the basis that I am not a minimalist poster? So what would you expect from me as a request for more information, as opposed to a challenge?On a purely gut level, your asking Wisdom about Hiraki reads a tad defensive and disingenuous to me. Wisdom already said he was pretty much following Umlaut on that, so that much should have been clear to you. It read to me as challenging Wisdom, not engaging him to elaborate. I could be wrong there but you are clearly not a minimalist poster so a short "Why Hiraki" doesn't seem likely to be genuinely engaging from you.
1. Misrep/strawman. Please take that "quote" you gave and align it with what I actually said.The rest of your post doesn't make sense in context, btw. I asked "What leads you to the conclusion that Hiraki is my partner?" and you responded with "You asking what leads me to the conclusion that Hiraki is my partner." This is necessarily false, and therefore cannot be the answer to my question.
2. Also, that's notexactlythe question you asked me. Here it is for context:
1. With aIn post 1183, Jingle wrote:Let's phrase this a different way then.Why does it make any sense for me to be specifically a likely scumpartnerto someoneon the basis that I was attempting to engage a townread about their suspicion on that player?Specifically,what is the logical reason that leads you to the partner conclusionbased on me replacing in and asking someone to talk MORE about why a particular player is scum, especially after I have already expressed that I cannot be allowed to survive into LYLO?very generousreading, there is a question here of "what leads you the conclusion that Hiraki is my partner?" These are the bits that I've underlined. I answered that in part by saying I see some defensiveness in your questioning Wisdom on Hiraki. If you want me to go back and check associatives further, fine, I should anyway, but that isn't really what you asked me.
2. Each of those underlined bits is accompanied by avery defensivesecond line of questioning, the bolded bits, which is "why would what I have done make sense if me and Hiraki are partners?" I chose to respond to this, saying that there is a world in which this makes perfect sense.
I didn't see a question to respond to but I suppose you might have just wanted a reaction to it. I saw your version of events and didn't find anything particularly convincing one way or another.Further, it occurs to me you never answered my 1149. What ever came of that analysis?
You apparently find my analysis suspect because only two votes came after the claim. One of those includes your slot, so yeah, from my POV that gives you a scumpoint. From your POV, that shouldn't seem illogical or even worth me responding to...
Also, Pine might not have cared about pushing a Fuzzy lynchif he knew he had a scumbuddy who could seal the deali.e. your slot, so that is still very plausible.-
-
Jingle For Whom the Bell Trolls
- For Whom the Bell Trolls
- For Whom the Bell Trolls
- Posts: 15212
- Joined: July 17, 2013
- Location: Texas
Acknowledged, but not answered as yet. I'll get to this in a bit, but it's neither a time nor a word amount concern.In post 1190, MathBlade wrote:
The other conversation aside:
What do you make of Hiraki?
And assuming you are town and I am town and Hiraki is scum who is scum with Hiraki and why?
Assuming you are town and Hiraki is town and I am town who is scum and why?
Lastly why shouldn’t I believe you are scum with Hiraki?
If you need more words than the post limit allows post <NEED A POST> and I will provide one.
Your claim to be a linguist IRL actually makes this a bigger deal. Everything about this post is pairing me and Hiraki. Not that Hiraki and I are independently scum with Pine, but that we TOGETHER are scum with Pine. Trinity is independently scum, but no sentence mentioning either me or Hiraki doesn't also mention the other.In post 1192, LuckyOtter wrote:In post 1188, Jingle wrote:
Except that this is not the argument you made. What you did mention was a progression that lead you to think we were specifically partners.In post 1184, LuckyOtter wrote:It's not, really. Both Umlaut and Wisdom had you and Hiraki as Pine buddies. They are both dead. The easy answer to this is you and Hiraki are scum. That doesn't make it the right answer, but it's the easy answer and you should be well aware of this if you've read the thread. I believe you've read the thread, just not that you are confused about why people are putting you and Hiraki together.
Here is what I said:
Note that at no point am I 100% sold on the idea that you're partners. What I'm saying is that I can see a world in which you are. Tell me what is specifically confusing you here.In post 1169, LuckyOtter wrote:Easiest answer here isJingle+Hiraki. At least one, maybe both.Bothwere after Wisdom D1 as well, and I felt pretty confident then that scum was pushing that wagon. Right now I'm more confident about Jingleslot than Hiraki, though it occurs to me that Hiraki might be buddying me, and Jingle's apparent confusion over Hiraki as 3rd scum (1152) makes thatpairingmore likely. Still need convincing it's not Trinity, though.
:thorface:Otter wrote:
So I just typed up aJingle wrote:
A direct request for more information is "Challenging, not engaging him to elaborate"? And this on the basis that I am not a minimalist poster? So what would you expect from me as a request for more information, as opposed to a challenge?Otter wrote:On a purely gut level, your asking Wisdom about Hiraki reads a tad defensive and disingenuous to me. Wisdom already said he was pretty much following Umlaut on that, so that much should have been clear to you. It read to me as challenging Wisdom, not engaging him to elaborate. I could be wrong there but you are clearly not a minimalist poster so a short "Why Hiraki" doesn't seem likely to be genuinely engaging from you.385 word answerto this. The TL/DR is that you're asking someone to explain agut read(kind of silly), this is a really minor point in my thought process, and the person you're asking is a linguist who constantly overanalyzes things like tone in text conversation, so let's all decide if it's really worth me posting this or if it will just be a distraction.
Otter wrote:
1. Misrep/strawman. Please take that "quote" you gave and align it with what I actually said.Jingle wrote:The rest of your postdoesn't make sense in context, btw. I asked "What leads you to the conclusion that Hiraki is my partner?" and you responded with "You asking what leads me to the conclusion that Hiraki is my partner." This is necessarily false, and therefore cannot be the answer to my question.
Jingle wrote:"You asking what leads me to the conclusion that Hiraki is my partner."In post 1184, LuckyOtter wrote:Regardless, the more important thing here is that you seem to be implying that it wouldn't make any sense for scum!you to ask Wisdom to elaborate on his scumread of scum!Hiraki. Why not? For one thing, it would make perfect sense if the goal is to distance yourself from Hiraki. I mean, here you are saying "why would I do this to my partner?', so in the event of your lynch, you would hope that we'd say "well he probably wasn't trying to put that much attention on his partner, so it can't be Hiraki."
For another thing, I'd think Wisdom giving a really vague but determined scumread on your partner would be really scary for you as scum. There's no chance to reason with him and he has potential to be very influential on the town, so getting Wisdom to elaborate on his scumread would give both you and Hiraki a chance to refute some points and diffuse suspicion (if not for Wisdom, then for the rest of the town). Whether or not you are present to do so is irrelevant. The fact that you didn't get this from Wisdom, saw that he was consistently giving vague reads over the game and wasn't likely going to be engaging you or Hiraki in any sort of 1v1 that would be beneficial to you or especially Hiraki in endgame makes his NK make perfect sense in this scenario.
Very generous apparently means contextual, in this case.2. Also, that's notexactlythe question you asked me. Here it is for context:
1. With aIn post 1183, Jingle wrote:Let's phrase this a different way then.Why does it make any sense for me to be specifically a likely scumpartnerto someoneon the basis that I was attempting to engage a townread about their suspicion on that player?Specifically,what is the logical reason that leads you to the partner conclusionbased on me replacing in and asking someone to talk MORE about why a particular player is scum, especially after I have already expressed that I cannot be allowed to survive into LYLO?very generousreading, there is a question here of "what leads you the conclusion that Hiraki is my partner?" These are the bits that I've underlined. I answered that in part by saying I see some defensiveness in your questioning Wisdom on Hiraki. If you want me to go back and check associatives further, fine, I should anyway, but that isn't really what you asked me.
The question was not "why would what I have done make sense if me and Hiraki are partners?" but "why do you think me and Hiraki are partners based on that evidence?"Otter wrote:2. Each of those underlined bits is accompanied by avery defensivesecond line of questioning, the bolded bits, which is "why would what I have done make sense if me and Hiraki are partners?" I chose to respond to this, saying that there is a world in which this makes perfect sense.
The important thing is not that there is a world where it makes sense. The important thing is that that is the conclusion you drew. There is a world in which hoofbeats come from a zebra. That still doesn't mean someone who shouts "Zebra!" everytime they hear hoofbeats isn't noteworthy.
The fact is that your analysis does not match the sequence of events in the thread, which I pointed out in that post. I would think that for someone as interested in analysis as you appear to be, that would definitely at least bear a response.Otter wrote:
I didn't see a question to respond to but I suppose you might have just wanted a reaction to it. I saw your version of events and didn't find anything particularly convincing one way or another.Jingle wrote:Further, it occurs to me you never answered my 1149. What ever came of that analysis?
You apparently find my analysis suspect because only two votes came after the claim. One of those includes your slot, so yeah, from my POV that gives you a scumpoint. From your POV, that shouldn't seem illogical or even worth me responding to...
Also, Pine might not have cared about pushing a Fuzzy lynchif he knew he had a scumbuddy who could seal the deali.e. your slot, so that is still very plausible.This is a Parachute.-
-
MathBlade He/HimTechnical SupportHe/Him
- Technical Support
- Technical Support
- Posts: 42761
- Joined: September 9, 2013
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Western US
I think that your defense of yourself rather than posting any sort of read is rather telling Jingle.
Even if all those points are true, you advocate for what you think is the best play for town as scum.
I am waiting for you to actually post a question or some bit of hunting before I go in depth. I think I understand how you operate as scum and if you are I want to throw you off your game a bit. And if you aren’t the unbiased nature of how I will go about this will surely help you.
@Hiraki
1) Again that proves the point. One liners and prod dodges showed he cared enough to stay in the game. He didn’t want to change the gamestate at those points hence his posts were small.
2)I wasn’t implying it as a huge chess move. What I am implying is that he cared enough to see it through. He didn’t just post it once and forget about it or half ass it. He continually attacked Army. He kept on fighting. That is someone who cares whether his team wins or not.
3) Again the seriousness of the posts is irrelevant. What matters is that he kept posting. He could have just shut up. He was outed scum. That means either he was told to do it in scum chat again or cared enough to post it on his own. The tone of them is irrelevant.
4) So? Again. Him not responding to your probe if you’re town makes him scum which has been proven. However there are hall markers of him caring all over.
I do not think there is anyway Dunnstral is scum with Pine. I’d only reevaluate if Jingle flips green.ScumBlade's eloquent performance left me utterly disoriented, debased, depraved and sent me spiraling into a horrific murky abyss with emotional turmoil and immense despair as my only companions until slowly I suffocate in my own gloom, surrounded by failure. I will never recover. -- Zachstralkita about Mini 1841
GTKAS -- MathBlade-
-
Dunnstral he/himGoodfellashe/him
- Goodfellas
- Goodfellas
- Posts: 40581
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Pronoun: he/him
I guess I can see jingle as mafia. Hiraki looks bad with his push on me this page (I think it's a little hard to believe what he's saying)In post 1181, LuckyOtter wrote:Dunn, what are your reads?-
-
Dunnstral he/himGoodfellashe/him
- Goodfellas
- Goodfellas
- Posts: 40581
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Pronoun: he/him
But apparently he couldn't read the mafia chat and his scum partner was guiding him in the main thread?In post 1191, Hiraki wrote:2) Correct, as a goon who didn't care and saw the opportunity. This isn't really a huge chess move.-
-
LuckyOtter Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 794
- Joined: May 24, 2018
- Location: North Carolina
Going to agree that Jingle is just trying to stall by quibbling with me. He's yet to actually come up with any sort of case against me, or anyone else for that matter. Not going to engage with Jingle until he provides some reads since our 1v1 is clearly going to go in circles based on his last response.
Also,@Mastina, can we get a prod of Lycanfire?He's not posted at all D4 yet.-
-
Dunnstral he/himGoodfellashe/him
- Goodfellas
- Goodfellas
- Posts: 40581
- Joined: April 2, 2016
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
Jingle For Whom the Bell Trolls
- For Whom the Bell Trolls
- For Whom the Bell Trolls
- Posts: 15212
- Joined: July 17, 2013
- Location: Texas
I'm satisfied.In post 1197, LuckyOtter wrote:Going to agree that Jingle is just trying to stall by quibbling with me. He's yet to actually come up with any sort of case against me, or anyone else for that matter. Not going to engage with Jingle until he provides some reads since our 1v1 is clearly going to go in circles based on his last response.
Also,@Mastina, can we get a prod of Lycanfire?He's not posted at all D4 yet.
L'Otter is scum, Hiraki is the likely partner.
First, L'Otter's analysis is very surface level for someone who is supposedly a linguist. Second, the complete lack of reevaluation when confronted with evidence that his read on the gamestate suggests he's not fitting reads to analysis but analysis to reads. Third, his analysis of the game itself is complete garbage, which suggests he's doing it not to critically think through what has actually happened, but rather to look like he's critically thinking. Fourth, his post today about lynching me, Hiraki, and Trinity suggests he doesn't think the game will be over after lynching both me and Hiraki, meaning exactly one scum in those two. The awkward linking of me and Hiraki means that when I flip green, he has every opportunity to back down from the Hiraki lynch and switch to whatever lynch gets the most support. Finally, as he begins realizing that my posts are not about defending myself but rather digging for his alignment, he's suddenly not interested in talking to me anymore.
If anyone wants clarification or elaboration, speak up.
Otherwise, I intend to selfvote as soon as Trinity is back. Not before, because if the game is going to sit in limbo waiting on them or a replacement it should happen while we can actually still talk, not during a nightphase.This is a Parachute.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.