not really, no. maybe tomorrow if im still aliveIn post 2525, Dunnstral wrote:Do you want to talk about this?
if this is multiball,In post 2528, Nachomamma8 wrote:These points are strengthened if this is actually multiball, where claiming masons goes from really dumb to unbelievably dumb.
scenario 1) you're scum and you don't gambit, you've got a pretty hard uphill battle when staeg goes down d1 (which was almost certainly going to happen before the claim)
scenario 2) you gambit and, you know, just like what's happening, neither of you are dead come d3 (and probably d4 as well)
even if this isn't multiball and feysal was SK and this is like 10:3:1, i could still reasonably see you making this play if your other partner was in a good position. i don't consider "it's stupid" (it's really not when people give you this much of a fucking free pass) and "i bus" good counter-arguments and i think you and staeg have been playing like scum
because including mariar's role with a full strongman is utterly stupid design. if there's a strongman, it's limited in some way and they didn't seem to care about that and went all out. i think two shots on her is more likelyIn post 2529, Nachomamma8 wrote:I don't know why you say limited strogman.
what? you said something like "why would feysal out multiball" and i suggested it might have something to do with the claim he used. you asked how the claim fits into thingsIn post 2537, AnonymousGhost wrote:Why are we believing anything Feysal has said again?
nothing to do with believing anything he said, just answering the question you originally posed
