Mini Normal 2023 - Game Over

[Gamma Emerald]

y'all don't get how this wrok do you
if you give 3 choices you assist in the ability to determine what is wanted. since you can't vote someone multiple times multivoting someone does nothing. I actually believe this is good practice, and can link you the game where I first saw this practice in action. I endorsed it there as well. it's offsite fyi

[Gustavo]

This 3 choices thing is p.dumb.

[popopopopopopo]

y'all don't get how this wrok do you
if you give 3 choices you assist in the ability to determine what is wanted. since you can't vote someone multiple times multivoting someone does nothing. I actually believe this is good practice, and can link you the game where I first saw this practice in action. I endorsed it there as well. it's offsite fyi

i think its a dumb idea so i am responding to it in kind

[BuJaber]

"Opinions are like assholes Watson, everyone's got one"

[BuJaber]

Unofficial VC (if each person had 3 votes instead of 1):
Dr.D - 4 (Gamma, BuJ, Gustavo, Locke)
Garmr - 4 (Gustavo, Locke??, DrD, garmr)
French - 3 (Gamma, BuJ, garmr)
James - 3 (BuJ, garmr, Locke)
Unrealseal - 2 (garmr, DrD)
Gamma - 2 (Gustavo, DrD)
Popop - 1 (Gamma)
BuJ - 1 (Krazy)

[Garmr]

Just going to say I'm not voting Dr.D even if it means a no lynch.

[Gustavo]

That VC messes me up. If you could please stop those pseudo VCs, I’d appreciate it

[Krazy]

Unofficial VC (if each person had 3 votes instead of 1):
Dr.D - 4 (Gamma, BuJ, Gustavo, Locke)
Garmr - 4 (Gustavo, Locke??, DrD, garmr)
French - 3 (Gamma, BuJ, garmr)
James - 3 (BuJ, garmr, Locke)
Unrealseal - 2 (garmr, DrD)
Gamma - 2 (Gustavo, DrD)
Popop - 1 (Gamma)
BuJ - 1 (Krazy)

Downplaying my double vote on you and popo's triple on Gamma.

OK. So even by your own stupid game that's mean to spread the scumreads, you are trying to manipulate town perceptions.

We're back on this. Fuck the traction.

Vote BJ

[Gustavo]

Just going to say I'm not voting Dr.D even if it means a no lynch.

Lynch garmr please.

[Krazy]

Just going to say I'm not voting Dr.D even if it means a no lynch.

Lynch garmr please.

Can you get on board for BJ first plz?

[Garmr]

Can we get day 1 over even if it means my lynch. I really want to get spoilers from the mod because I want to know If I'm right about who's scum.

[UnrealSeal]

I'm back.

Sorry for being gone for a while. I was down with a nasty illness that left me unable to use the computer without adding to my already throbbing headache.

I'll do a catchup soon.

[Gustavo]

I’ll vote whoever to prevent a NL but until then I strongly urge it be garmr. He basically used scum tactics to annoy me enough where I claimed and after that he changed his tune and tried to look useful but hasn’t been.

Garmr needs lynched as my dying request.

[Garmr]

I'm back.

Sorry for being gone for a while. I was down with a nasty illness that left me unable to use the computer without adding to my already throbbing headache.

I'll do a catchup soon.

Hope you get better soon

[Gustavo]

Can we get day 1 over even if it means my lynch. I really want to get spoilers from the mod because I want to know If I'm right about who's scum.

More scum tactics

[Garmr]

I’ll vote whoever to prevent a NL but until then I strongly urge it be garmr. He basically used scum tactics to annoy me enough where I claimed and after that he changed his tune and tried to look useful but hasn’t been.

Garmr needs lynched as my dying request.

I advise you get spoilers when you die, well at least on my slot. The reason being so you don't spew bull shit in the death thread for me to read when I get there.

[Gustavo]

More scum tactics.

Quit the wifom bullshit

[Gustavo]

And sorry didn’t want them fight with him anymore. I’ll go back to letting town do whatever the heck they are doing.

[Garmr]

More scum tactics.

Quit the wifom bullshit

That's not the concept of wifom can you get any mafia phrases right. Wifom is situations like this player x does would do action A as scum and action B as town. But you know player X knows action A is scummy so he would do action B to look town .

The phrase your looking for is appeal to emotion (Normal emotions aren't something you would understand). Which I been accused of in so many previous games I have grown null to it.

[Garmr]

Wifom is situations like this player x

does/would

do action A as scum and action B as town. But you know player X knows action A is scummy so he would do action B to look town .

fixed

[BuJaber]

Downplaying my double vote on you and popo's triple on Gamma.

OK. So even by your own stupid game that's mean to spread the scumreads, you are trying to manipulate town perceptions.

We're back on this. Fuck the traction.

Vote BJ

The point of the exercise is to find out the most popular wagons because with 1 vote each there isn't one person everyone wants to lynch really really badly.

For that objective you count as one person.

If I counted your 2 votes on me as 2 and I became the top wagon by this method and then came time to vote for said wagon, therr would not be enough votes for lynch.

So I can't count your vote on one person more than once because it would exaggerate the popularity of the wagon.

It isn't each individual player's ordering of lynches, it is the entire playerbase's ordering.

In a game with 2 krazies and 3 popos playing it'd be different.

@Gustavo okay I'll do it with words entirely so it looks nothing like a votecount.

Exsmple: fried chicken, two votes - colonel sanders and leeroy jenkins

[popopopopopopo]

big fos on bujaber after the last few pages

shot up my scum list

krazy what do you think about a gamma wagon

[Gustavo]

The point of the exercise is to find out the most popular wagons because with 1 vote each there isn't one person everyone wants to lynch really really badly.

There was though. That was me. I got to l-2 as a COUNTER WAGON to garmr.

So either I’m scum who faked claimed or garmr is scum because his counter got the largest push.

There is your lynch pool.

Me or garmr

[BuJaber]

You honestly don't see anything scummy in being secretive?

When you have 1 vote you only need to justify 1 vote. When you have 3 you need to justify 3.

Now of course not everyone who shares their top 3 scumreads with reasons is automatically townie but what is the town motivation not to do it?

Like maybe you don't see the benefit of doing it. But it's been done now. So being a holdout and not sharing, can you explain what's pro-town about that? I'm not seeing any situation where a townie sharing some scumreads with everyone else would be bad for said townie / would be bad for the town.

[BuJaber]

The point of the exercise is to find out the most popular wagons because with 1 vote each there isn't one person everyone wants to lynch really really badly.

There was though. That was me. I got to l-2 as a COUNTER WAGON to garmr.

So either I’m scum who faked claimed or garmr is scum because his counter got the largest push.

There is your lynch pool.

Me or garmr

And neither of you got lynched.

What does thst mean?

Not enough people wanted you dead.

If you two ended up tied top wagons again we now have the deadline to force people to pick a side.

But the fact is if majority truly wanted you or garmr lynched you would have been lynched.