Well I mean, in a 10 team you are generally looking at
2 QB
8 RB
10 WR
2 TE
2 Def
that would normally be rostered not be rostered and that's in addition to all the other WW gems out there. But this is not a super important argument so if you and Panzer like smaller leagues then you just do and that's ok.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I've never done anything other than 11 or 12, but I'd imagine less than 12 would be similar to the deeper 12-man league I'm in (same lineup but nine bench slots instead of six).
I think L2 being 12 would be ideal, but that's not possible this year without L3 being four people (which hey, I'm sure Panzer would be down for). Not being PPR isn't that weird, but hey at least this isn't my point per quarterback completion league...
several of us have stated that we'd pull double duty in L3 if the need be. I'd be for a 12/12/8?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 106, xRECKONERx wrote:We should lock down draft dates soon tho. My August calendar is quickly filling up
agreed. I know I'm commishing L1 and I just wanted to not step on Mith's toes.
In post 0, mith wrote:L1:
Internet Stranger
Talitha
pickemgenius
Rob13
AGar
pablito
Yiley
Nero Cain (commish)
Rhinox
Jahudo
Xalxe
I'm also going to steal Sharon b/c I'm pretty sure she won L3 and was supposed to go to L1. I'll make a when is good.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 108, Nero Cain wrote:I'm also going to steal Sharon b/c I'm pretty sure she won L3 and was supposed to go to L1.
nope, nm
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Signups are officially closed - I'll set up L2/L3 tomorrow (I'll commish both). We'll go 12/10/10, with five of us pulling double duty in L3.
Given that only half of L3 will even count for promotion, I'm going to just split the divisions that way (all dupes and all non-dupes). L3 will not promote directly to L1, and their promotion status will depend solely on relative finish to one another. Promotion will be as follows:
L1 - bottom three to L2
L2 - top three to L1, bottom two (?) to L3
L3 - top two among the non-dupes (?) to L2
The actual number of promotions and relegations in L2/L3 depends on how many L2 has next year (and realistically, we will probably have enough turnover in L2 again that everyone returning will be in). Full priority order:
(And someone please check the OP to make sure I didn't miss anyone. I've removed hascow since he would only reduce the number of dupes, not remove them entirely.)
The funniest thing about it is I'm pretty sure he wouldn't even be in L1 if I wasn't wrongfully demoted for missing 3 weeks of a season, (2 of those weeks I won anyway, ftr).
But yeah, mostly just don't read Nero post. They are all nonsense.
In post 99, xRECKONERx wrote:I've found 10 to be the sweet spot, but 12 is pretty similar.
I agree. I personally only want to play with 10 or 12 players as 8 or 14 players are too far in their spectrums
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
Better of doing daily with less 8 or more than 12(probably better off doing daily regardless of number). But I would play less than 8 but not for money. I'd never play more than 12.
In post 120, PJ. wrote:The funniest thing about it is I'm pretty sure he wouldn't even be in L1 if I wasn't wrongfully demoted for missing 3 weeks of a season, (2 of those weeks I won anyway, ftr).
But yeah, mostly just don't read Nero post. They are all nonsense.
Wasn't that like 4 years ago? Time to get over it? And that's not even true b/c of my 3 years in L1 I've finished 6 and 7th and 11th. So like, I was above being demoted the year you were for a lack of activity.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
4 years ago i was demoted from L1 for winning, you have 3 years in L1. Do you even read your own post? You did the time line for me an proved my point. Zzzzzzx