What do you mean "amazing understanding?" I didn't criticize theIn post 243, ceejayvinoya wrote:You seem to have thought that me saying that means I suddenly have an amazing understanding of what's going on around here. Sorry to disappoint you, but nah.
Trying to throw gasoline on the Oath wagon by saying that you can't understanding saying "there's a whole lot of nothing" rings tremendously insincere when you then pulled exactly the same thing. It looks an awful lot like you were using the "lot of content" as your reason to not post D1 and let Oath wagon sail through, and then D2 (when you can't get away from posting) you just decided to just switch to a relatively lazier way to catchup, forgetting your statement that you were doing a linear read.In post 162, ceejayvinoya wrote:Lols. I don't know what you're talking about. There's actually a lot of content here. I grossly underestimated this game when I joined and went like "oh 7 pages. This would be a breeze."In post 157, Oath wrote:I mean I'm obviously reading the thread and if something was more than 70% likely to be scum I'd speak up, but in 7 pages we have a whole lot of nothing. Excuse me for not railing another possible townie on weak reasoning. It's not my style. I jump in when it's worth it.
---
If we have two scum alive in a field of 7 and nearly everyone is okay with the game limping, what does that tell you about the status quo?In post 249, nonny wrote:Is it bad that the game pace is making me want to just hammer? N_M does appear scummy and like he’s hiding behind meta but we are also crawling along slower than a snails pace.
Like look at KMD. He thinks not_mafia is a bad lynch today, and that invisibility is likely scum. Invisibility is voting for not_mafia, which should make not_mafia an even less appealing lynch from his point of view. But despite all that, it sure doesn't look like KMD is actually concerned about stopping the not_mafia lynch in favor of his invisibility lynch. Shouldn't he be?
Or hey, look at me. I seem to be held in pretty high town esteem. Does that mean people are engaging with my ceejay case? Well huh, not really. In fact, the only other player to actually give a
It sure seems like people want to affect a casual stance on not_mafia, but are simultaneously super unwilling to consider other options. So uhh, yeah, I do think it's bad to want to just hammer based on the game pace, because the answer is to demand more engagement from folks instead of capitulating to it.