this is a really pathetic reason for someone who has been playing mafia since at least 2013 on this site to "hard" scum read someone for.Would also like to point out Saudade is acting the same way he did in the scum game I mentioned before.
No doubt there.In post 224, Saudade wrote:Looks like I successfully pocketed DoubtingThomas this game as well
In post 223, Wh4t wrote:I'll be back when the thread isn't so spaz.
Nah I prefer Doubting Thomas at least I get something intelligent out of them and they are more likely to get associative's with a scum flip so we get clears and a good idea who scum is with the amount content they post. I think I found a better way to throw my reel outIn post 217, Saudade wrote:Flip your vote to me if I am your hard scumread after all
. In post 224, Saudade wrote:Looks like I successfully pocketed DoubtingThomas this game as well
that was @ sadtrainIn post 231, Saudade wrote:scared huh
yeah I'd be too if I was up against me
dt is a much easier to unsettle
I read a bit of one. Pretty similar but the differences I noticed were less omgusy.In post 219, Havo wrote:Have you seen his town game?In post 205, Garmr wrote:Would also like to point out Saudade is acting the same way he did in the scum game I mentioned before.
In post 233, Garmr wrote:I read a bit of one. Pretty similar but the differences I noticed were less omgusy.In post 219, Havo wrote:Have you seen his town game?In post 205, Garmr wrote:Would also like to point out Saudade is acting the same way he did in the scum game I mentioned before.
The most controversial player here btw is rc. So that's wrong.In post 212, Saudade wrote:Literally just picked up two controversial players by page 9 and decided to brand them as hardscum
could you get any more lazy and basic
That was in response to you calling me a child.
Used that to prove how your point about being condescending is a scrum trait wrong. You are painting a picture here.In post 221, DoubtingThomas wrote: - you called me a child too. that's null.
Never said you are scummy for this bit alone I did say as whole with the amount of misrep going past my thresh hold is scummy. You seem to dissect a post but at the cost of having the ability to read the post as a whole.In post 221, DoubtingThomas wrote: - he treats it like that, so you are wrong.
>okay so the points i made, i can treat as scum? but you are just shading that as saying, "well i saw more, and it's null"
>so how come you are okay with giving havo entitlement to his opinion while you think i am scummy for being entitled to my opinion? LOL
...... are you really saying saudes do you want to vote me was legit question.....In post 221, DoubtingThomas wrote: - he wants the question answered, and saudade was running away.
>he wasn't. and this is a different argument.
Great then you are wrong.In post 221, DoubtingThomas wrote: -Posting obvious shit about game state is null
>okay.. but in my opinion, it's scummy and that's okay because,AS YOU SAID YOURSELF:
"becauseItreats it as such."
1.Portrayed him as defensive when he wasn't being- I am misrepping him
> how?
Extra point. Doubting Thomas is playing the victim game here. Trying put himself/herself in the same position as havo when their circumstances are different.literally, you let him express his opinion, yet you don't want to do that for me, somehow, it seems.
who is misrepping who?
Banter and a OMGUS reactionsIn post 221, DoubtingThomas wrote: dude, your post literally bleeds, "I dont believe what I am saying. I am scum."
nice try, train guy. I am the real thomas. thanks for outing.
VOTE: garmr
I take back what I said about anything intelligent coming out your mouth.In post 235, DoubtingThomas wrote:In post 233, Garmr wrote:I read a bit of one. Pretty similar but the differences I noticed were less omgusy.In post 219, Havo wrote:Have you seen his town game?In post 205, Garmr wrote:Would also like to point out Saudade is acting the same way he did in the scum game I mentioned before.
wahhhhhhhhhh wahhhhhhhhh he omgus'ed mee wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
asking for reasoning is nitpicking?In post 141, Wh4t wrote:Actually thinking about it FA can be a scum read. I found his entrance awkward, he then froze only to appear later pushing RC for his claim in a totally nonsensical way. He then continues to scumread RC for wanting to policy lynch him in a way that makes me feel like he knows RCs alignment. RC and FA are not SvS unless this is some dramatic scum theatre but I don't see why FA would inflate the suspicion already on RC this early.
Also, now instead of assessing my play as a whole to get a read on me he just nitpicks the post where I found him scummy in a way that feels defensive. If you were objective town you wouldn't feel the need to ask me designed questions to throw shade on me, when I'm cleary a threat to scum by being a player who easily obv.towns. I also dislike that your push on me is half-hearted, with no conclusion and no vote.
VOTE: FA_q2
Knew I forgot something.In post 205, Garmr wrote:Would also like to point out Saudade is acting the same way he did in the scum game I mentioned before.
Throbbing scum reads
Doubting thomas,Saudade
Null scum-
IAI,FAQ2
Null-town
WH4T,texkitty
Town
Havo
Confirmed Town
garmr
Didn't you just scum read havo for being condescending?In post 225, DoubtingThomas wrote:this is a really pathetic reason for someone who has been playing mafia since at least 2013 on this site to "hard" scum read someone for.Would also like to point out Saudade is acting the same way he did in the scum game I mentioned before.
like. i refuse to believe this possibility. you have to be scum here or i lose trust in humanity, or at least the mafia community.
Oh I never thought of the possibility DT is trying to pocket Saudade.In post 244, Wh4t wrote:Yeah that whole thing with Havo/Saudade/DT makes me think worse of Saudade and DT rather than Havo. It seemed like DT was baiting Havo into reacting and then made a big fuss when Havo wanted to reply via laptop instead of instantly, which has happened to me before by scum. I think DT looks worse than Saudade, I doubt they are scum together though.
I like how FA just spun my nitpicking comment to further illustrate how he nitpicks posts to portray people a certain way. There is no objectivity at all tbh. I'm happy with where my vote is atm.
