you just said bbm is playing like bbm.Lawrencelot wrote:Unvote; Vote: Flameaxe. Like pickemgenius, he is playing a bit... how do you call it... not very serious. But peg's role sucks so his behaviour is explainable.
hehe
you just said bbm is playing like bbm.Lawrencelot wrote:Unvote; Vote: Flameaxe. Like pickemgenius, he is playing a bit... how do you call it... not very serious. But peg's role sucks so his behaviour is explainable.
are you saying that my vote was bull shit or that your response to my voe is bull shit?JamesThePhox wrote:CKD: I know. And my response to your vote was pretty bullshit too.
SSK was not fishing. We have a day start on an open set up, how is SSK fishing and how was it worth a vote?Flameaxe wrote:Yes, you are fishing. Think about it, and stop being retarded.
Unvote, Vote: MafiaSSKStop protecting your buddy, scum.
“Not very serious”…so do you think he is playing scummy? Why is it ok for one player to be not serious but another to be? Seems to me that PEG’s role would give him the opportunity to really be aggressive during the day..why does his role suck?Lawrencelot wrote:Unvote; Vote: Flameaxe. Like pickemgenius, he is playing a bit... how do you call it... not very serious. But peg's role sucks so his behaviour is explainable.
If Flameaxe always plays like this, it is probably not scummy, but I don't know. Peg's role either sucks (as scum) or does not suck (as town), but if his role does not suck it does not allow him to play aggressively, so you're basically saying a contradiction. I often see people play less serious if their role is less... interesting.curiouskarmadog wrote:“Not very serious”…so do you think he is playing scummy? Why is it ok for one player to be not serious but another to be? Seems to me that PEG’s role would give him the opportunity to really be aggressive during the day..why does his role suck?Lawrencelot wrote:Unvote; Vote: Flameaxe. Like pickemgenius, he is playing a bit... how do you call it... not very serious. But peg's role sucks so his behaviour is explainable.
This gives mecuriouskarmadog wrote: my mistake...yeah PEG role does suck, and I guess it would benefit him (scum or town) to stay low and not really make stances on things.
yeah i agree. just because you have a bad role doesn't mean you don't have to play..pickemgenius wrote:This gives mecuriouskarmadog wrote: my mistake...yeah PEG role does suck, and I guess it would benefit him (scum or town) to stay low and not really make stances on things.moreof a reason to take stances on things, cause if I get NK'ed the town doesnt lose a "power" role...
Dang, I like your style.Anatole Kuragin wrote:It's not going to help trying to lynch the best/worst roles, what have to go off of right now is how people act following the jokearound stage. I'd suggest going through the assholes first then the non-contributing lurkers.
You will get nowhere on this site.Anatole Kuragin wrote:It's not going to help trying to lynch the best/worst roles, what have to go off of right now is how people act following the jokearound stage. I'd suggest going through the assholes first then the non-contributing lurkers.
Flameaxe wrote:You will get nowhere on this site.Anatole Kuragin wrote:It's not going to help trying to lynch the best/worst roles, what have to go off of right now is how people act following the jokearound stage. I'd suggest going through the assholes first then the non-contributing lurkers.
Gorrad wrote:Dang, I like your style.Anatole Kuragin wrote:It's not going to help trying to lynch the best/worst roles, what have to go off of right now is how people act following the jokearound stage. I'd suggest going through the assholes first then the non-contributing lurkers.
Gorrad wrote:Did I say I agree with him? I don't. I just like his style. He's not standing for the BS that some players continually put out, yourself notably among them, PEG.
AK, please read the Wiki article on Team Asshat.