anyways, on an unrelated note, not sure why i should be townreading shoshin. from the very beginning i kind of just took it as a granted but looking back on his posts right now (and especially those from today), i realize that i was giving out far too easy of a townread.
this is a really scummy pop-in after being prodded that when i look at it really reminds me of scum feeling like "i really don't want to put in the effort to fake something towny so let me just make a few posts in a row"
no effort to get a scumread lynched, a scumread who is apparently so strongly scumread that he asks why he isn't lynched yet. it feels very fake to me.
there's basically no actual content for the rest of his iso up until now, and it's been 5 days since he's posted anything despite having posted in other games within that timeframe
Spoiler: the rest of his iso up until now, you should also look at these yourself because the timestamps of the posts are also important
In post 1577, Shoshin wrote:That's literally the point I was making about Profii.. and you unvoted when asked...
In post 1578, Shoshin wrote:Actually nvm, I can't keep things straight. I'm not reading this very carefully atm
In post 1583, stungun0404 wrote:@shoshin i actually need to know why you were so adamant about aronis claiming last day phase? so much so that you were entirely distracted from the profii lynch.
I don't think it's okay for players to troll around like Aronis, be put at L-1 where it's obvious they're going to get lynched if they don't claim, and then refuse to claim. I find that sort of behavior anti-town and I think it's anti-town to let it continue.
In post 1593, Shoshin wrote:Your view of my play is too simplistic, Stun. You're missing the forest for the trees.
not that i think it's necessarily ai. i know there have been times where i've just happened to show up as people have started to talk about me. it's actually happened to me frequently.
I find it odd that NSG of all people would suspect me for inactivity when that's basically her thing too... Also my early play should clear me either way, lots of stuff there that I can't fake as scum.
In post 1757, northsidegal wrote:why will you be obvtown? are there any obvious differences between your town and scum game that i should be aware about?
There's a remarkable difference between the two. You're welcome to review for yourself.
In post 1757, northsidegal wrote:why will you be obvtown? are there any obvious differences between your town and scum game that i should be aware about?
There's a remarkable difference between the two. You're welcome to review for yourself.
what's the difference? if it's so glaring, mind giving me a little hint? that should make things easier, after all.
i don't understand why my small comment that people were overconfident in their reads has affected you this much. i'm sorry? i didn't think it would be much of a point of contention once people saw who the actual scumteam was. i never even said anything about your play specifically, nor anything
other than
or
worse than
"people were overconfident in reads that were wrong". i still don't understand how that can be much of a point of contention considering how that game actually ended.
In post 1763, northsidegal wrote:i don't understand why my small comment that people were overconfident in their reads has affected you this much. i'm sorry? i didn't think it would be much of a point of contention once people saw who the actual scumteam was. i never even said anything about your play specifically, nor anything
other than
or
worse than
"people were overconfident in reads that were wrong". i still don't understand how that can be much of a point of contention considering how that game actually ended.
I don't understand why my comment that you tend to be inactive affected you so much? I'm sorry? I didn't think it would be much of a point of contention since your post count in my games is usually towards the very bottom of players.
As for Tropical, it's a huge point of contention since you're just wrong about what happened in that game. I was literally voting scum when I was mislynched, so the idea that I was "overconfident" doesn't make any sense... all my townreads were correct (i.e. all of the remaining town members, except Mumble), and I had the scum narrowed down by poe such that town would have won if I hadn't been stupidly mislynched (and btw, I was only mislynched because of a single player's stupidity, not the collective stupidity of town).We're talking about a single overconfident player - Mumble - who fucked things up. Your assessment of the game felt very superficial and dishonest, in a way that makes me think you were trying to discredit me before this game even got going. Or you're being honest and that makes me resent you because it's insulting. A lot more insulting than saying you're inactive, since you're actually insulting my play whereas I'm just saying you're inactive, same as me.
In post 1751, northsidegal wrote:this is a really scummy pop-in after being prodded that when i look at it really reminds me of scum feeling like "i really don't want to put in the effort to fake something towny so let me just make a few posts in a row"
Explain how this suspicion isn't based on my inactivity.
I'm hoping scum won't kill me in the mistaken belief that I'll be mislynchable. I won't be, but hopefully the scum don't know that. And then I'll get into the game in a beautiful way tomorrow.
In post 1764, Shoshin wrote:As for Tropical, it's a huge point of contention since you're just wrong about what happened in that game. I was literally voting scum when I was mislynched, so the idea that I was "overconfident" doesn't make any sense... all my townreads were correct (i.e. all of the remaining town members, except Mumble), and I had the scum narrowed down by poe such that town would have won if I hadn't been stupidly mislynched (and btw, I was only mislynched because of a single player's stupidity, not the collective stupidity of town).We're talking about a single overconfident player - Mumble - who fucked things up. Your assessment of the game felt very superficial and dishonest, in a way that makes me think you were trying to discredit me before this game even got going. Or you're being honest and that makes me resent you because it's insulting. A lot more insulting than saying you're inactive, since you're actually insulting my play whereas I'm just saying you're inactive, same as me.
-shrug-
i apologize. it was never anything i said in reference to you specifically back when 2012 was still going on, and in this game when someone mentioned "overconfidence" i suppose i simply associated it with you given that i also associated overconfidence with 2012, which you were in. the idea that i did it to discredit you is silly, especially given that i doubt anyone has taken it to heart - i had barely remembered it myself, and i am genuinely very surprised to see how much it mattered to you. again - sorry.
In post 1751, northsidegal wrote:this is a really scummy pop-in after being prodded that when i look at it really reminds me of scum feeling like "i really don't want to put in the effort to fake something towny so let me just make a few posts in a row"
Explain how this suspicion isn't based on my inactivity.
it's not based on simply your presence or lack of presence in the thread, it's based on the content of your posts while you're here. i'm not sure how you would associate that with activity.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
