In post 1898, Shoshin wrote:NSG, I said the read is fabricated. Do you understand the meaning of the word "bullshit"?
you specifically said that it was fake after i pointed out the contradiction in your thought process
your original post was this:
In post 1869, Shoshin wrote:NSG saying that I'm scummy because of content is bullshit. My content is fine. She suspects me because I'm not around, period.
i feel as if the important part to focus on here is the "she suspects me because i'm not around, period"
that comment doesn't make sense to make about someone who you believe is scum.
at the end of the day i could be correct about your comment not making sense regarding someone who you actually scumread and you could still be town
i don't really think that's the case, but as i've said before i think scum are within three people so that leaves open the possibility that you're the town within that group
just don't want my degree of confidence to be overstated or anything, which is something i've tended to notice when i get into arguments like this. people begin to think that the point i'm arguing means that i'm dead set on whatever or whoever i'm arguing about / with being scum. that's not necessarily the case, although i do think you have a decent chance of being scum.
In post 1898, Shoshin wrote:NSG, I said the read is fabricated. Do you understand the meaning of the word "bullshit"?
you specifically said that it was fake after i pointed out the contradiction in your thought process
your original post was this:
In post 1869, Shoshin wrote:NSG saying that I'm scummy because of content is bullshit. My content is fine. She suspects me because I'm not around, period.
i feel as if the important part to focus on here is the "she suspects me because i'm not around, period"
that comment doesn't make sense to make about someone who you believe is scum.
You're emphasizing something I said in the middle of a train of thought while completely ignoring its surrounding context. The important part is where I say that your read is "bullshit," which is both my introductory statement (i.e. thesis statement) and conclusion. The middle part is me comparing what you're doing with what you'd do as town, which is typical of the way I present scumreads in my town games.
The fact that you're emphasizing one part of my post while literally ignoring the surrounding context is scummy as hell. It's actually the definition of misrepresentation and it's how scum push mislynches.
Creature, look at the way NSG is misrepresenting me. Taking something completely out of context while ignoring what I'm actually saying to push this idea that I'm contradicting myself. Please explain to me how that isn't scummy.
In post 1869, Shoshin wrote:NSG saying that I'm scummy because of content is bullshit. My content is fine. She suspects me because I'm not around, period. Saying otherwise is bullshit. And so is her read on Profii. I don't see how she's townreading that.
This is my original post.
And this is how NSG presents the original post:
In post 1869, Shoshin wrote:NSG saying that I'm scummy because of content is bullshit. My content is fine. She suspects me because I'm not around, period.
She completley ignores the part where I describe what NSG's doing ("saying otherwise") as "bullshit." This is incredibly manipulative. It's how actual misrepresentation looks. You take something that a townie said out of context and then emphasize its importance while ignoring everything else the player said.
Hey Maria, remember this is exactly what I suspected Shepard for in Errant's game? He did the same shit to me and he flipped scum, as you know.
And of course so much hedging in all of NSG's posts. Doesn't want to overstate anything. Doesn't have confidence about anything. Yet has this core group of poe based on nothing? Like, no reason to townread Profii yet refuses to vote him? NSG's posting this game is bullshit. Her reads don't make any sense. Her focus on a couple scumreads based on poe suggests a strong degree of confidence about townreads, yet there's nothing to the townreads...
In my last game with Maria, we both together tunneled the same player for 3 days until the player was finally lynched. That player flipped scum.
To me, the fact that Profii is being pushed by players with a record for good reads yet can't be lynched for some unknown reason is actually a sign that Profii is scum, not town.
In post 1911, Shoshin wrote:And of course so much hedging in all of NSG's posts. Doesn't want to overstate anything. Doesn't have confidence about anything. Yet has this core group of poe based on nothing? Like, no reason to townread Profii yet refuses to vote him? NSG's posting this game is bullshit. Her reads don't make any sense. Her focus on a couple scumreads based on poe suggests a strong degree of confidence about townreads, yet there's nothing to the townreads...
My perspective is that NSG hasn't ever considered the possibility of scum!profii, at best NSG is saying I'm null or a town lean
it seems perfectly fine for NSH to not be voting there and makes me further concerned with you that you are trying to talk NSG into that vote
In post 1922, profii wrote:My perspective is that NSG hasn't ever considered the possibility of scum!profii, at best NSG is saying I'm null or a town lean
it seems perfectly fine for NSH to not be voting there and makes me further concerned with you that you are trying to talk NSG into that vote
Then why is she focusing on a small "poe" instead of continuing to evaluate alignments? If you're null, why aren't you in her poe and why isn't she willing to compromise?
