In post 297, Almost50 wrote: In post 294, skitter30 wrote:this is a dumb thing to pick a fight about, no offense
all it does is make me wonder if this is an actual thing or if you made it up
You're not thinking straight and are letting "local events" affect your "global read" on me. That said, I'll try to point you to the right direction: Why would scum!me SR specifically 4 people and TR everyone else? Does it not "limit" my space to maneuver that I TR as many people? The space you are well aware I need to get both my "mis"lynches and my NKs through?? And why would scum!me be trying to intimidate a TOWN READ on mine? Am I trying to pocket him or alienate him here?? Finally, why would I be voicing my suspicions of MWNN when I know for a fact he can't be lynched on D1 (or at least not at this point of the day), given that the site meta is against lynching lurkers and especially so when they've declared V/LA?? You try to think of a scum motive for me to be doing all this, and then IF you find one you'd be more than welcome to reevaluate your initial read on me.
ok so, thought about it a bit more:
theres twelve people, with 9 town and 3 mafia. u hang 3 town and nk 3 of them, mafia automatically wins.
u can tr ur scumbuddies, and sr the others, and shoot the people u tr'd.
as for intimidating tr, im not sure who ur talking about nor what ur really meaning
and for mwnn, u could be setting up for a ml later in the game.
however, i do agree this is a far-fetched theory
a50s reaction to skitter feels kinda natural to me
im gonna be re-evaling him soon
HeWhoSwims wrote: In post 265, Vex Vience wrote:HeWhoSwims wrote:Might just be a playstyle difference then but in general that pings my scumdar
Although skitter is saying that I might be making a mistake for thinking similarly of Gemerald
it is a playstyle difference
i find questioning (to an extend) townie before it becomes just pure "all i do is ask questions and nothing else"
That's what I was trying to say too.
glad we understand
HeWhoSwims wrote: In post 272, skitter30 wrote: In post 261, HeWhoSwims wrote:You said that after my post though.
And you can base reads on what people say apart from your questions, too.
If you're only/mostly asking questions and or discussing the setup it looks like empty busywork to me. If it goes on too long
do you currently think that vex is doing the busy-work sort of questioning?
Currently, no, he's way better, I like the fact that the absence of reads is made up for by that pretty huge post. His questions earlier were what kinda pinged me + the setup discussion which was a dead horse or so I thought.
(im making this remark at the risk of accidentally outting my main (if u guys really are that determined to search everyone's games for a similar reads style))
thats how i do my reads just as a headsup, dont expect many small reads posts apart from a "i like x" or "i think y is scum" with some short reasoning type posts.
i do most of my reads as the giant wall of everyone once or twice a day rather than a bunch of smaller read posts many times per day. personally for me, the giant wall helps me out the most bc i explain everything i think about peoples iso, (and yes, itll cover multiple days, ull see that if i get to late-game), plus i get to organize my thoughts much more cleanly than a google doc or solo-pt of random quotes and ideas.
u also get to see how i got to the conclusion of "x is (town/scum)" and how that idea changed over time.
expect another giant wall post before eod assuming we dont wagon someone while im working on the reads
