mini normal 2027: advice mafia (endgrame)

[Completly Trustworthy]

I didn't defend Wh4t RC, I merely said I don't like the pace at which this wagon is forming and we need to get more info out of players like GE and Ruby Red. There is over a week to decide on a lynch, so just pushing one wagon and not expressing suspicion of anyone else is bad for the town because it limits discussion.
I will probably vote for Wh4t in the end because his last few posts seem weird compared with the rest of his ISO and he has not been posting much, but I won't just sheep your opinion again when you might be evil and were wrong once before. I want more evidence before I commit.

[Gamma Emerald]

Gamma Emerald, I made that post because I wanted to see how you reacted to an accusation. I'd say your stated motive for asking Garmr why he said he had x-shots was pretty good, so I can get behind that line of thinking. Now, you're one of the players alongside Ruby Red I'd like to hear more from. So far you've commented on many posts from the game, but I would like to know what your current position on all the players is. Can you post a reads list for everyone still alive?

Ordered or not?

hi i'm bored of this game so i'm going to let postie post for me glglglglglglglglglgl

So you admit that was true

[Gamma Emerald]

Hi, why are you answering for Garmr when you know that's something you shouldn't do? And I thought of that myself, I just wanted to see if he'd squirm when I pressed him. So thanks for ruining that.

So you literally are allowed to answer for texcat but if anybody else answer for me that's wrong?

No, what I'm saying is that after I received backlash, he did the same thing, so I was more asking why he did something he knew would probably not be looked favorably upon.
And tbh if he agreed with my logic, why preempt your response?

[Garmr]

Hi, why are you answering for Garmr when you know that's something you shouldn't do? And I thought of that myself, I just wanted to see if he'd squirm when I pressed him. So thanks for ruining that.

So you literally are allowed to answer for texcat but if anybody else answer for me that's wrong?

No, what I'm saying is that after I received backlash, he did the same thing, so I was more asking why he did something he knew would probably not be looked favorably upon.
And tbh if he agreed with my logic, why preempt your response?

Well I was calling you out for being a hypocrite.

Though why would you claim x shot if you intended to retract anyway?

To make it more believable because people seemed iffy about it. Thought that was obvious.

[the worst]

hewwo Ruby?

[RadiantCowbells]

@ruby

[Ruby Red]

oh uh

[Ruby Red]

hey ducky, can you respond to this completely truthfully

i won't tell anyone, and nobody else read this.

Spoiler: for the worst's eyes only

you're scum, right?

[Ruby Red]

also like.... lol at the logic of keeping a watcher alive to sort from the nks

and not masons

[Ruby Red]

my current poe is this:
{tw, sky, CT, garmr, wh4t, RC}

[Completly Trustworthy]

Ruby Red, why are GE and Havo off your list of suspects? They were on the FA wagon, which I support lynching on.
As for the list of reads Gamma, you giving a good one would make me feel better about you since I would have an idea of where you stand and what you are doing to solve the game, so please do so.

[RadiantCowbells]

why am I in your poe and why don't you have strong opinions about who scum are?

[RadiantCowbells]

cuz, like, idk.

I guess I had what I will now call a fantasy that you replaced in to correctly townread me and defend me and help me lynch scum but I guess in reality you're just being your usual self who underperforms every time that I hope you come through for me.

[RadiantCowbells]

still happy about wh4t and CT, should be able to find the last scum when they're gone,

ruby red

isn't going to be helpful so let's go.

[Completly Trustworthy]

It is very dangerous to assume that anyone is confirmed town, so expecting everyone to townread you is silly RC. I might think better of you if you made a comprehensive case on why Wh4t is scum and tried to get everyone on the same page through evidence rather than just demanding a vote. Right now, I think your process for finding scum is a little suspect, someone making one post implying that they are hesitant to vote a person you think is suspicious does not mean they are scum. Townies vary in opinion and will not always be on the same page with you.So I'm not going to follow you off a cliff RC, especially since it seems likely you are scum or are voting a townie. After all, if you are normally a mislynch, why are several people just going along with what you say mindlessly? I think the reason is because you are casting suspicion on a townie. I'd prefer to lynch on the FA wagon, which almost certainly contains scum. That is why I am currently questioning you and GE, both of you are players that I need to understand better.

[the worst]

hey ducky, can you respond to this completely truthfully

i won't tell anyone, and nobody else read this.

Spoiler: for the worst's eyes only

you're scum, right?

Spoiler: for ruby's eyes only

not this time you?

[RadiantCowbells]

I didn't defend Wh4t RC, I merely said I don't like the pace at which this wagon is forming and we need to get more info out of players like GE and Ruby Red. There is over a week to decide on a lynch, so just pushing one wagon and not expressing suspicion of anyone else is bad for the town because it limits discussion.
I will probably vote for Wh4t in the end because his last few posts seem weird compared with the rest of his ISO and he has not been posting much, but I won't just sheep your opinion again when you might be evil and were wrong once before. I want more evidence before I commit.

It is very dangerous to assume that anyone is confirmed town, so expecting everyone to townread you is silly RC. I might think better of you if you made a comprehensive case on why Wh4t is scum and tried to get everyone on the same page through evidence rather than just demanding a vote. Right now, I think your process for finding scum is a little suspect, someone making one post implying that they are hesitant to vote a person you think is suspicious does not mean they are scum. Townies vary in opinion and will not always be on the same page with you.So I'm not going to follow you off a cliff RC, especially since it seems likely you are scum or are voting a townie. After all, if you are normally a mislynch, why are several people just going along with what you say mindlessly? I think the reason is because you are casting suspicion on a townie. I'd prefer to lynch on the FA wagon, which almost certainly contains scum. That is why I am currently questioning you and GE, both of you are players that I need to understand better.

What between these two posts changed your mind about that, or did you scumbuddies tell you not to bus?

[Completly Trustworthy]

I've been suspicious of Wh4t for a while as 690 shows. It's not that I don't think he could be scum, its just that I'm nervous about voting with you now RC. That's why I'm asking you to case Wh4t and talk about the other players. If I understood your logic and knew what you were doing to solve the game beyond trying to lynch Wh4t, I would probably be voting for him right now. Also, its standard practice to analyze who might be scum on a mislynch wagon, that's why I'm asking you and other people questions right now. As long as I get more content from suspicious slots like yours, I'm happy with Wh4t as the lynch for today. At this moment though, I'm frustrated due to GE not giving the list of reads like I asked, you accusing me instead of answering questions, and there still being little content to judge Ruby Red from.

[Completly Trustworthy]

Basically, I'd would normally be voting for Wh4t right now, but I'm currently hesitating to do so because plenty of people from the FA wagon(you, Sky, Havo, TW) are on it. RC, I followed your lead once and it didn't pay off, now I want to be more careful before doing what you say. If you and others engaged with me further, this problem might be fixed.

[texcat]

Let's try this...

VOTE: Gamma Emerald

[Havo]

Basically, I'd would normally be voting for Wh4t right now, but I'm currently hesitating to do so because plenty of people from the FA wagon(you, Sky, Havo, TW) are on it. RC, I followed your lead once and it didn't pay off, now I want to be more careful before doing what you say. If you and others engaged with me further, this problem might be fixed.

If RC is scum, there’s a very good chance that he’s the only scum on the FA wagon.

If RC is town, then there’s a very good chance at least 2 scum on that wagon.

Just vote What, and I’ll solve this game tomorrow.

That’s why my activity has been throttled. I’m waiting patiently for Day 3. If What is the lynch today, we’re good. If someone other than What is the lynch, then all bets are off. I know it’s asking a lot, but I’m supremely confident here.

[the worst]

VOTE: wh4t

[Completly Trustworthy]

TW, you don't get to vote twice lol. Also, has anyone here played with Havo before? Does he typically try to solve the game on day three as he is here?

[the worst]

Don't remember if I was voting him or not and don't really care enough to check

Havo is pingy lol the fact he says that expecting to live to d3 is great

[texcat]

Basically, I'd would normally be voting for Wh4t right now, but I'm currently hesitating to do so because plenty of people from the FA wagon(you, Sky, Havo, TW) are on it. RC, I followed your lead once and it didn't pay off, now I want to be more careful before doing what you say. If you and others engaged with me further, this problem might be fixed.

If RC is scum, there’s a very good chance that he’s the only scum on the FA wagon.

If RC is town, then there’s a very good chance at least 2 scum on that wagon.

Just vote What, and I’ll solve this game tomorrow.

That’s why my activity has been throttled. I’m waiting patiently for Day 3. If What is the lynch today, we’re good. If someone other than What is the lynch, then all bets are off. I know it’s asking a lot, but I’m supremely confident here.

First, I disagree with your assumption that if RC is scum, he is the only scum on the wagon. Second, I don't see what that has to do with voting Wh4t. Third, I don't know why you think you can only solve the game if we lynch Wh4t.