mini normal 2027: advice mafia (endgrame)

Havo · Post Post #1450 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 12:29 pm

Yeah. I know it’s asking a lot.

If I tell you how the magic works, then it’s not the same.

And I get murdered.

Garmr · Post Post #1451 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 1:06 pm

In post 1444, texcat wrote:Let's try this...

VOTE: Gamma Emerald

I was scum reading you but I agree this slot is scummy.

VOTE: Gamma Emerald

ISO · Post Post #1452 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 1:13 pm

I think texcat might be town now rofl

Completly Trustworthy · Post Post #1453 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 1:23 pm

Garmr, why do you dislike the Wh4t wagon and want to vote somewhere else? Can you say why you think GE is more suspicious or make a case for Wh4t being towny?

Garmr · Post Post #1454 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 1:39 pm

In post 1453, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Garmr, why do you dislike the Wh4t wagon and want to vote somewhere else? Can you say why you think GE is more suspicious or make a case for Wh4t being towny?

I don't dislike the wh4t wagon I just don't understand why his being scumread I asked multiple times but got no answer.

Completly Trustworthy · Post Post #1455 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 1:40 pm

Also, The Worst, why do you think Texcat is town now?

ISO · Post Post #1456 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 1:43 pm

prodge?

ISO · Post Post #1457 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 1:58 pm

In post 1455, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Also, The Worst, why do you think Texcat is town now?

I had a dream about texcat being town

Havo · Post Post #1458 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:11 pm

In post 1457, the worst wrote:
In post 1455, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Also, The Worst, why do you think Texcat is town now?
I had a dream about texcat being town

If you had a gun and could shoot someone right now.

Give me 2 names.

ISO · Post Post #1459 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:15 pm

Gamma and Wh4t prolly haven't thought about shooting people

I would have targeted rc n1 tho lmao

Havo · Post Post #1460 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:18 pm

In post 1459, the worst wrote:Gamma and Wh4t prolly haven't thought about shooting people

I would have targeted rc n1 tho lmao

Nice. Lol.

Completly Trustworthy · Post Post #1461 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:31 pm

If you would have shot RC n1, doesn't that mean you are suspicious of him? If so, then why are voting for someone RC is pushing right now?

ISO · Post Post #1462 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:32 pm

CT if you're ready to shit yourself open this spoiler

Spoiler:

Completly Trustworthy · Post Post #1463 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:35 pm

Well then why did your read change? It had to have been because of something that happened on d2 since you would have shot him n1.

ISO · Post Post #1464 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:40 pm

you're a perceptive one

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1465 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2018 4:09 pm

I'm gonna be sober over the next few days and that's not good news for scum.

schadd_ · Post Post #1466 (ISO) » Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:09 am

ask your librarian for more advice!

Vote count 2.2

Wh4t (4):

RadiantCowbells, Skygazer, the worst, Havo

Gamma Emerald (2):

texcat, Garmr

RadiantCowbells (1):

Wh4t

the worst (1):

Completly Trustworthy

not voting (3):

Gamma Emerald, Ruby Red, HeWhoSwims

with 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch. day 2 ends september 15 at 17:00 central US time; in (expired on 2018-09-15 18:00:00)

mod notes

HWS is vla

[/area]

Completly Trustworthy · Post Post #1467 (ISO) » Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:16 am

We need to start talking again, if we keep posting at the same rate, we're handing the game to the scumteam.

ISO · Post Post #1468 (ISO) » Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:28 am

gamestate wise with no one really pushing anything i think scum is probably fine with the game state here??

like Wh4t is still likely scum tho so i think that means associatively scum has settled with bussing to distance themselves

gonna try to work on more sorting tonight but i have a recital in three days that im not fully prepared for lol

ive been slow rolling some things and i think that its highly likely that whoever has been scumreading/shading RC without pushing may be scum trying to set up a later mislynch

now i just need to reread to figure out who that matches up with

Garmr · Post Post #1469 (ISO) » Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:43 am

Going Vla because of I'm holiday.

texcat · Post Post #1470 (ISO) » Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:48 am

In post 1467, Completly Trustworthy wrote:We need to start talking again, if we keep posting at the same rate, we're handing the game to the scumteam.

It bothers me that Wh4t has just disappeared when he is the vote leader, but I'm not sure that means anything as far as his alignment goes.

@mod -- Could we get some prods for Wh4t and Gamma please?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1471 (ISO) » Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:22 am

In post 1447, Completly Trustworthy wrote:TW, you don't get to vote twice lol. Also, has anyone here played with Havo before? Does he typically try to solve the game on day three as he is here?

You mean day 2 right
And what do you mean solve on day [two]?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1472 (ISO) » Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:47 am

In post 928, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 439, Garmr wrote:
In post 438, RadiantCowbells wrote:You ask it as a question and not an accusation and not in terms of anyone's alignments

the fact that she's been buddying me isn't really in question, the question is why
You guys aren't masons are you?
Why vocalize this?

I've been searching my ISO for threads that haven't been pursued to my satisfaction, and this is something that needs re-opening for discussion, since we have flipped masons. Honestly, this disturbs me as it means Garmr had them on the brain without (as we know) anything to clue him into the idea.
Also as far as I've seen Garmr hasn't used the results of his gambit at all. That makes me VERY suspicious as I know it CAN be useful.

Garmr · Post Post #1473 (ISO) » Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:52 am

In post 1472, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 928, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 439, Garmr wrote:
In post 438, RadiantCowbells wrote:You ask it as a question and not an accusation and not in terms of anyone's alignments

the fact that she's been buddying me isn't really in question, the question is why
You guys aren't masons are you?
Why vocalize this?
I've been searching my ISO for threads that haven't been pursued to my satisfaction, and this is something that needs re-opening for discussion, since we have flipped masons. Honestly, this disturbs me as it means Garmr had them on the brain without (as we know) anything to clue him into the idea.
Also as far as I've seen Garmr hasn't used the results of his gambit at all. That makes me VERY suspicious as I know it CAN be useful.

^When you don't even realisew you came off the scummiest when dealing with these things.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1474 (ISO) » Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:06 am

In post 934, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 639, RadiantCowbells wrote:also I've held back just how scummy I find tor's short stint in the game because I wanted to see how wh4t responded to that entrance but I'm getting bored of waiting for the day that never comes.
I just realized RC has been making a lot of references and it's concerning me a bit

I want RC to respond to this thought