*thinking*In post 21, Umlaut wrote:Ugh why am I still awake
VOTE: Davesaz
I always vote him eventually so I may as well do it now.
This gut pings me from Umlaut
*thinking*In post 21, Umlaut wrote:Ugh why am I still awake
VOTE: Davesaz
I always vote him eventually so I may as well do it now.
1. Too many games too count.In post 36, Completly Trustworthy wrote:1. What is your experience at Mafia?
2.What do you think is the optimal town strategy?
3.What do you think is the optimal scum strategy?
4. What are good ways to scumhunt?
5. What are bad ways to scumhunt?
Good eyeIn post 53, Lapsa wrote:In post 36, Completly Trustworthy wrote:5. What are bad ways to scumhunt?I think I found itIn post 39, tictac wrote: 5.looking for bad logicinstead of bad motivations.
what do ya think if IOs vote on ya? Is it a joke or serious?What is the logic behind it?
just a word that I am a sucker for RQS, it's a dreadfully under-rated idea, I think in the right hands it can be a powerful weapon. I have a friend from another site who is good at using RQS, he doesn't play much anymore though.In post 68, Completly Trustworthy wrote:If a player were to say they think meta is not a good scumhunting tool in my survey, then voted someone later on for the same reason, I would scumread them due to contradicting their earlier stated opinions. Also, people's reasons for answering questions and reactions to the posed survey can be AI as well. In one of my previous games, a scum player was the first to offer answers. In my experience, scum like doing things to gain towncred, such as being quick to answer my questions. In addition, a town player answering would help me understand their positions and general playstyle while also offering content to talk about. Overall, I find it is usually pretty good to have a RQS if you can get at least four responses from the other players.
Answering questions certainly is not going to get your town cred unless it's some question about a night action or something.In post 68, Completly Trustworthy wrote:If a player were to say they think meta is not a good scumhunting tool in my survey, then voted someone later on for the same reason, I would scumread them due to contradicting their earlier stated opinions. Also, people's reasons for answering questions and reactions to the posed survey can be AI as well. In one of my previous games, a scum player was the first to offer answers. In my experience, scum like doing things to gain towncred, such as being quick to answer my questions. In addition, a town player answering would help me understand their positions and general playstyle while also offering content to talk about. Overall, I find it is usually pretty good to have a RQS if you can get at least four responses from the other players.
passIn post 73, Lapsa wrote:let's just get rid of that bad apple
VOTE: Completly Trustworthy
choo choo policy lunch time!
BRING IT ON.In post 26, Purrcocet wrote:this town isn't big enough for the three of us, mala
that's right you and Lapsa are going to have to fight to the DEATH
Love this~In post 27, Lapsa wrote:can't wait
Haven't played but one game recently. So answering this would be useless atm.In post 36, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Here are some questions I like to ask people at the start of a game:
1. What is your experience at Mafia?
2.What do you think is the optimal town strategy?
3.What do you think is the optimal scum strategy?
4. What are good ways to scumhunt?
5. What are bad ways to scumhunt?
Thing pings the crap out of me. I'll look over mafia games on site after this and I don't kill IpHones in the process.In post 47, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Yes, nos, look at Newbie 1882. Its a completed game where I behaved similarly.
Your name reminds me of my ex. Also this is a lazy as fuck vote and reason.
Agree with this from IO.In post 62, Io wrote:It's honestly not even really worth answering. I haven't exactly played Mafia in about a year.
I also just don't think it's a good idea to tell scum the optimal plays for them to do just in case they are clueless.
As for scum hunting you just need to rely on analysis of posts and have good pattern recognition, also push everything you see no matter how small it may be.
Read the above response to Popo. The same applies to you.In post 73, Lapsa wrote:let's just get rid of that bad apple
VOTE: Completly Trustworthy
choo choo policy lunch time!
You have exs named popopopo and lapsa?In post 83, Malakittens wrote:
Your name reminds me of my ex.Also this is a lazy as fuck vote and reason.
Read the above response to Popo. The same applies to you.In post 73, Lapsa wrote:let's just get rid of that bad apple
VOTE: Completly Trustworthy
choo choo policy lunch time!
Yeah the only one was light_ganski's fire and iceIn post 80, Io wrote:Yeah we played together gamma, but I ended up replacing out. At least in the only one I remember us playing together. I did only play like 3 or 4 games though.
Yeah I'm gonna trust my gutIn post 84, Malakittens wrote:Oh.
VOTE: Umulat
This is a good place to start. Your intro post reminds me how you started our last micro.
How are his posts hard to read? Just because they're written well? I don't see how that makes a post hard to read.In post 88, popopopopopopo wrote:i am very down for a policy lynch on this guy im not reading those posts
From a rvs vote.In post 14, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Also, xRECKONERx, why did you vote for Zito with no stated reason? Was it random or not?
I will give ct a null town read. Because it's similar to that game so far.In post 30, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Hello everyone, this looks like it will be a very good flavor game. I always prefer those over regular games.
VOTE: Nosferatu
Also, Umlaut, why do you always vote for Davesaz as you said in 21?
Oh there's also mini 1854In post 87, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah the only one was light_ganski's fire and iceIn post 80, Io wrote:Yeah we played together gamma, but I ended up replacing out. At least in the only one I remember us playing together. I did only play like 3 or 4 games though.
What’s your tictac read based on? It looked to me like you did a me too to a post that didn’t have a good reason.In post 89, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah I'm gonna trust my gutIn post 84, Malakittens wrote:Oh.
VOTE: Umulat
This is a good place to start. Your intro post reminds me how you started our last micro.
still voting tictac for now though
Kinda think it’s too early to play the policy card. Do you have anything more substantial to offer?In post 88, popopopopopopo wrote:i am very down for a policy lynch on this guy im not reading those posts
Is it pc to hate apple?In post 82, Malakittens wrote:Catching up. Maybe it will take my focus off of hating apple products so fucking much rn
Are you going to dismount your high horse and play soon?In post 72, Nosferatu wrote:this'll be a fun game to carry
nopeIn post 95, davesaz wrote:Kinda think it’s too early to play the policy card. Do you have anything more substantial to offer?In post 88, popopopopopopo wrote:i am very down for a policy lynch on this guy im not reading those posts