Newbie 1888 | Stuff I Found Online IV | Over

[Plotinus]

Official Vote Count 1.01

Trapezium: At the Heart of Orion via NASA.

---

Lynching

With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

the worst

(2): Draynth, Hugo Stiglitz

xx2008

(1): Inferno390

Hugo Stiglitz

(1): Mister Rogers

Not Voting

(5): xx2008, innocentvillager, nastytoe, the worst, boguspotatohead

Deadline:

(expired on 2018-09-17 18:00:00).

Mod notes:

Keep it fun

Nastytoe and boguspotatohead have not confirmed and are being replaced. If they confirm before a replacement can be found, they can stay.

[Mister Rogers]

@Mod:

I bolded my vote in post #12. Are you saying I MUST use the voite tags? I think they are ugly :"(

[Inferno390]

So Hugo can defend himself, which by extension means no one else can point out how what you’re saying is not accurate?

[Hugo Stiglitz]

I'm not worried about it but what I find strange is that Hugo is using your vote as the basis of something that is more serious, when its pretty obvious that your vote was simply RVS. Did you notice that, how he says "also"?

Uh yeah because when someone else has already voted them i'm not the first??

[Mister Rogers]

I find Hugo's creation of a Worst wagon unnaturally phrased. I don't find your argument against this to be accurate. He makes a team vote out of a single vote that is only his.

[Mister Rogers]

I'm not worried about it but what I find strange is that Hugo is using your vote as the basis of something that is more serious, when its pretty obvious that your vote was simply RVS. Did you notice that, how he says "also"?

Uh yeah because when someone else has already voted them i'm not the first??

Well, what exactly is your reason for voting Worst?

[Hugo Stiglitz]

I'm not worried about it but what I find strange is that Hugo is using your vote as the basis of something that is more serious, when its pretty obvious that your vote was simply RVS. Did you notice that, how he says "also"?

Uh yeah because when someone else has already voted them i'm not the first??

Well, what exactly is your reason for voting Worst?

Because I recognize that name, and the game I know them from (Newbie 1887? Its called know your list mods hosted by Tbone) is currently active so i'm unable to discuss/elaborate on my feelings at this time. Let's just call it salt ^_____^

[Plotinus]

@Mod:

I bolded my vote in post #12. Are you saying I MUST use the voite tags? I think they are ugly :"(

Fixed, thank you. You don't

have

to use vote tags if you don't want to, but the automated vote counter needs a colon or it won't recognise the vote. Like this:

vote: Plotinus

[Plotinus]

Please try to pretend that other ongoing games do not exist until they are finished.

[Mister Rogers]

Good enough sir!

Unvote

[Inferno390]

So in other words, it’s just a RVS vote.
Rogers, I think you’re way overthinking this, and I don’t like that.
P-edit: Okay.
That’s a forced invite.

[Mister Rogers]

So far Inferno we must agree to disagree but once again, I prefer to let the game flow naturally, rather than get into details about how I view RVS etc.

[Mister Rogers]

I don't like how you are so agreessively pursuing everything I say while holding your vote on a random person but I don't see how I can stop you since I am assuming it is simply your playstyle.

[Inferno390]

Not only is 36 an incredibly evasive post, but I could hearlily argue that there is nothing natural or flowing about what you are doing this game.

P-edit: Well I don’t like the fact that you’re response to me pointing out the fact that what you were saying was flawed was to shade the frick out of everything I say, but you don’t see me trying to make the things you say look scummy while simultaneously distancing myself from the situation.

[Mister Rogers]

This is at least the third time you have ascribed motives to myself ragrding yourself that simply do not exist. Do you do this as town too?

[Inferno390]

And how am I aggressive pursuing anything here? I pointed out that there were some flaws in what you were saying. You promptly started shading me. And I’m the one being aggressive?

[Inferno390]

Would you stop it with the fricking shade.
If you think my actions are scummy, just fudging say they’re scummy and explain why.

[Inferno390]

I don't like how you are so agreessively pursuing everything I say while holding your vote on a random person but I don't see how I can stop you since I am assuming it is simply your playstyle.

You are OBVIOUSLY painting my actions as scum here while distancing. I’m not sticking nonexistent motives on you. I’m describing what I see.

[Hugo Stiglitz]

What does pedit mean

[Mister Rogers]

Most of what you are criticizing me for revolve around RVS flow. You are saying that I am "shading" you for your defense of Hugo; regardless of your personal intentions (subjective) your actions (objective) are that you defended him. He even used a post where I had to elucidate in his response. Now we both ultiumately agree that he was simply RVS voting based on a particular game he is observing which explains his phrasing sufficiently but regarding RVS flow, I would have preferred to allow him to come in to a defense without an explanatory post for him to quote and see his defense in a naked state; do you see what I mean there?

Also, I would prefer not to quote RVS scum hunting techniques in the thread for the same reason; do you get my point there?

[Mister Rogers]

So far your actions are highly aggressive and you are objectively fabricating bad motives. The only thing stopping me from calling you scum is that you probably do this as town too.

[Inferno390]

An edit to a post made in response to someone posting before you.
EX. I’m writing a post and submit it. The forum alerts me that Duck posted while I was writing. Instead of making another post to respond to Duck, I tack a p-edit to the end of it and write it out there before posting.

[Mister Rogers]

We are both accusing ourselves opf the same thing, just in different words. :shrug:

[Inferno390]

Any reason you are defending him?

This is shade. This is worded in a way to imply that my goal here is defending Hugo. That was NEVER the point of what I was saying.

I don't like how you are so agreessively pursuing everything I say while holding your vote on a random person but I don't see how I can stop you since I am assuming it is simply your playstyle.

Again. Shade. You are shading what I am doing as scummy, while distancing by saying that it could be playstyle.

This is at least the third time you have ascribed motives to myself ragrding yourself that simply do not exist. Do you do this as town too?

“Do you do this as Town too” is so fudging shade it’s ridiculous. The ONLY reason you would word this that way is if you think I’m scum. But you refuse to actually come out and say it or plainly state why you think I’m scum.

You are using technical crap to make me look as scummy as possible, and it’s a load of BS.
I’m not “objectively fabricating” anything. I haven’t given motives for ANYTHING you have done. I’ve just called out your shading crap and told you to knock it off.

This doesn’t come from town. This just doesn’t come from town.
VOTE: Roger

[xx2008]

Hello guys! This is my first game on the site, and I'm quite excited about it.

VOTE: Mister Rogers