NY 215: HMS Erebus - Game Over!

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:31 am

In post 395, Lapsa wrote:
In post 378, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 372, tictac wrote:ya unvoted too easy. from dumbness of orig vote was expecting an argument with a brickwall. I don't think it was real.
+ huge setup-spec post when ya posting light posts otherwise.
I generally am a brickwall, but I'm trying to not be that way. I mean, dave posted how he can't read me because he can't tell whether my pushes are scummy or stupid. As for the setup spec I went into teacher mode, step off.
and you are succeeding. dave did a great job

So I'm improving? You kinda obfuscated what you were saying.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:33 am

In post 399, Purrcocet wrote:do you own a enter key

yes he does
maybe it would be easier if he double spaced?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:35 am

In post 422, Purrcocet wrote:im actually a specialist in tunneling people like ct right into a green flip

and i flipped on all of my townreads last game when i shouldnt have so good luck getting me to do it this one

genuinely naive play is how i summarize it best. it reads as plastic sometimes, i usually read that type of shit as artificial

but its basically just playstyle and it can skew ur read in a lot of ways if you tunnel what essentially amounts to nai shit (which is something i need to work on)

not even that, hes dumbtold like 3 times

i dont really know what to make of you pushing it with such confidence but your posts amuse me lol

not lynch
---------------
laps
nos
akarin
ct

would lynch gamma or scioness atm

look to my pushes or votes if you want to see who i care to lynch but generally im being pretty dynamic
if people i didnt mention, its for a reason. or lack of one

we shouldnt have a long and unwieldy day one and that means it shouldnt be spent pushing on town

this post reminded me scioness was in the game
where you at Scioness?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:39 am

In post 438, Lapsa wrote:seriously - let's lynch Gamma. I know dude is certainly capable of playing this game better

#77 - shitty reason for a vote

In post 192, Gamma Emerald wrote:An explanation of why I suspect Umlaut (now Saudade):
So my first game with Umlaut I recall someone making a similar RVS vote. I don't recall the alignment of that person (my first thought is that they were probably town) but I do recall someone somewhere saying that sort of reasoning for an RVS vote is scummy.
I'm explaining this not so much to convince anyone as of yet, but more to open the discussion to where if I'm wrong, people can refute me.
^ I don't recall yet someone somewhere recalls someone making similar RVS vote and I'm not trying to convince anyone. Please refute me.

and that's that. there is no content whatsoever

VOTE: Gamma Emerald

You just called your own logic shitty, gj
as for the read explanation I recalled SOME things from that other game. I don't want to have to go back because it was an old game and it would take a little bit. As for wanting to be refuted, I didn't WANT it, I just wanted to leave the possibility open because I'm not egotistical enough to think I'm always right.
And here comes the classic bullshit line of "gamma isn't posting any content". You can fuck off with that.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:53 am

In post 443, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:gamma emerald

choo choo

VOTE: pox7
has not explained a single vote this game, this ends now

Nosferatu · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:25 am

In post 454, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 443, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:gamma emerald

choo choo
VOTE: pox7
has not explained a single vote this game, this ends now

what an asinine vote

Nosferatu · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:26 am

like the reasoning is self evident
it's a sheep

all of his votes are transparently policy or sheep

Nosferatu · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:29 am

In post 447, Purrcocet wrote:
In post 441, Hugo Stiglitz wrote: Woah, woah, wait. Is 192 a serious post and not a troll post??
I have a hard time believing you just now parsed this.

i can believe it

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:36 am

In post 456, Nosferatu wrote:like the reasoning is self evident
it's a sheep

all of his votes are transparently policy or sheep

ok cool
still think it's not town

Nosferatu · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:48 am

ok why

cause its not cause its not explained, which is literally why you voted.

so what is now the reason you think he's scum

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:55 am

He hasn't participated at all in discussion

davesaz · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 6:02 am

192 is a perfect example of what makes it hard for me to read Gamma.

Purrcocet · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 6:06 am

Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 438, Lapsa wrote:seriously - let's lynch Gamma. I know dude is certainly capable of playing this game better

#77 - shitty reason for a vote

In post 192, Gamma Emerald wrote:An explanation of why I suspect Umlaut (now Saudade):
So my first game with Umlaut I recall someone making a similar RVS vote. I don't recall the alignment of that person (my first thought is that they were probably town) but I do recall someone somewhere saying that sort of reasoning for an RVS vote is scummy.
I'm explaining this not so much to convince anyone as of yet, but more to open the discussion to where if I'm wrong, people can refute me.
^ I don't recall yet someone somewhere recalls someone making similar RVS vote and I'm not trying to convince anyone. Please refute me.

and that's that. there is no content whatsoever

VOTE: Gamma Emerald
You just called your own logic shitty, gj

did you really think lapsa wasnt being jokey in 77 gamma

In post 457, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 447, Purrcocet wrote:
In post 441, Hugo Stiglitz wrote: Woah, woah, wait. Is 192 a serious post and not a troll post??
I have a hard time believing you just now parsed this.
i can believe it

no i don't see how. minus the ct io and malakittens stuff, the last 8 or so pages are generally centered around gamma and his vote. 441 doesn't look like a real reaction to me

Nosferatu wrote:like the reasoning is self evident
it's a sheep

all of his votes are transparently policy or sheep

what fucks me up is i think town gamma would obviously know this
and what also fucks me up is would scum gamma make this push knowing this

Gamma Emerald wrote:He hasn't participated at all in discussion

what are your reads in the actives then?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 6:10 am

In post 462, Purrcocet wrote:did you really think lapsa wasnt being jokey in 77 gamma

I thought it was serious yeah

Nosferatu · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 6:31 am

In post 460, Gamma Emerald wrote:He hasn't participated at all in discussion

what makes you say that

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 6:44 am

In post 29, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:garmr

In post 52, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:completelytrustworthy

dont want to read his posts

In post 63, popopopopopopo wrote:
In post 61, Completly Trustworthy wrote:By the way, can you respond to my questions Io? So far, few people have given genuine responses, I need for people to answer in order for the RQS to have been worthwhile.
ur questions r shit and pointless

In post 66, popopopopopopo wrote:
In post 64, Nosferatu wrote:goddamn u live up to that pfp
was this directed at me

In post 88, popopopopopopo wrote:i am very down for a policy lynch on this guy im not reading those posts

In post 98, popopopopopopo wrote:
In post 95, davesaz wrote:
In post 88, popopopopopopo wrote:i am very down for a policy lynch on this guy im not reading those posts
Kinda think it’s too early to play the policy card. Do you have anything more substantial to offer?
nope

In post 267, popopopopopopo wrote:my bad dudes

can we just lynch someone

In post 290, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:nosferatu

In post 295, popopopopopopo wrote:lame

In post 443, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:gamma emerald

choo choo

his whole ISO
sheep votes, playstyle bashing, and one-liners is all I see

Nosferatu · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 6:51 am

are you implying that popo is the only person here to not have contributed to discussion?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:07 am

In post 466, Nosferatu wrote:are you implying that popo is the only person here to not have contributed to discussion?

no
but he's definitely the greatest offender

tictac · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:07 am

About Gamma:

In post 395, Lapsa wrote:
In post 378, Gamma Emerald wrote: I generally am a brickwall, but I'm trying to not be that way. I mean, dave posted how he can't read me because he can't tell whether my pushes are scummy or stupid. As for the setup spec I went into teacher mode, step off.
and you are succeeding. dave did a great job

I'm unpacking this since I don't think Lapsa is going to. I think it's meant to be sarcastic.
People are usually as smart as they are. "Trying to be smarter" is not an endeavor I'd expect immediate results from.
That town-gamma apparently succeeded is a feat that borders on the unbelievable and the observed phenomena could much easier be explained by him having informed POW.

In post 192, Gamma Emerald wrote:An explanation of why I suspect Umlaut (now Saudade):
So my first game with Umlaut I recall someone making a similar RVS vote. I don't recall the alignment of that person (my first thought is that they were probably town) but I do recall someone somewhere saying that sort of reasoning for an RVS vote is scummy.
I'm explaining this not so much to convince anyone as of yet, but more to open the discussion to where if I'm wrong, people can refute me.

Things is I could easily see this post coming from "i think I'm kinda crap, but I'm trying to be better" townie mentality and I don't really see scum-gamma writing this. He has to know it's null-content and that content above all is the site-meta for townreads.
Buut, this read

used to be

"gut", and I really don't see what changed to give it reasoning.
@dave Can ya expand on you view on this post? Specifically on what it is that makes it typical for gamma?

Random stuff:

In post 448, davesaz wrote:
In post 445, Lapsa wrote: for sweet sweet tictac towncred
What does this mean?

I'd like to know as well. I have a feeling I'm being laughed at and I don't enjoy it.

In post 404, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Rationalizing my read of you

It's not a good idea to use words ya don't know the meaning of.

In post 414, Hugo Stiglitz wrote: but what if she's a SERIAL KILLER!!

Ya can't both be SK, so.

In post 429, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 425, Io wrote:Where did the Scioness accusations come from all of a sudden? I've hardly noticed them today.
mad coasting

agreed.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:11 am

In post 468, tictac wrote:Buut, this read used to be "gut", and I really don't see what changed to give it reasoning.

It's a gut feeling
but there's a reason why I have that gut feeling
hopefully that makes sense

tictac · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:13 am

My gut reads are not at all like that. Comments on this from others please?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:15 am

In post 468, tictac wrote:I'm unpacking this since I don't think Lapsa is going to. I think it's meant to be sarcastic.
People are usually as smart as they are. "Trying to be smarter" is not an endeavor I'd expect immediate results from.
That town-gamma apparently succeeded is a feat that borders on the unbelievable and the observed phenomena could much easier be explained by him having informed POW.

Thanks. I mean, I'm not "trying to be smarter", I'm trying to recognize when I'm being senseless. The rest, okay, so Lapsa thinks I have an informed POV...why? I don't see the connector there.

popopopopopopo · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:17 am

In post 449, davesaz wrote:I'm not done with Lapsa, but we have a new winner for scummiest sheep.

VOTE: popopopopopopo

In post 454, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 443, popopopopopopo wrote:
vote:gamma emerald

choo choo
VOTE: pox7
has not explained a single vote this game, this ends now

pffffffffft-hahahahhahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

tictac · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:21 am

In post 471, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm trying to recognize when I'm being senseless.

Point is that is a really hard thing to do

The rest, okay, so Lapsa thinks I have an informed POV...why?

Well, really, I do. I think Laps agrees, but can't be certain.
He pushed ya from a weird angle, I think, but may be a difference in how we read.

Io · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:22 am

I dunno, I’m inclined to think Scioness isn’t scum atm just because of how little resistance their wagon has right now.
Like it went from no one saying anything to everyone agreeing they aren’t doing anything and a good lynch.