NY 215: HMS Erebus - Game Over!

Lapsa · Post Post #550 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:21 pm

In post 548, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hi Mr. Taking Posts Out Of Context
Maybe you wanna read the full post? Or does that inconvenience your agenda?

In post 471, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 468, tictac wrote:I'm unpacking this since I don't think Lapsa is going to. I think it's meant to be sarcastic.
People are usually as smart as they are. "Trying to be smarter" is not an endeavor I'd expect immediate results from.
That town-gamma apparently succeeded is a feat that borders on the unbelievable and the observed phenomena could much easier be explained by him having informed POW.
Thanks. I mean, I'm not "trying to be smarter", I'm trying to recognize when I'm being senseless. The rest, okay, so Lapsa thinks I have an informed POV...why? I don't see the connector there.

In post 395, Lapsa wrote:
In post 378, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 372, tictac wrote:ya unvoted too easy. from dumbness of orig vote was expecting an argument with a brickwall. I don't think it was real.
+ huge setup-spec post when ya posting light posts otherwise.
I generally am a brickwall, but I'm trying to not be that way. I mean, dave posted how he can't read me because he can't tell whether my pushes are scummy or stupid. As for the setup spec I went into teacher mode, step off.
and you are succeeding. dave did a great job

you have succeeded in not being a brickwall - your play is weak and ISO lacks content

on top of that - it sounds as if you were to shift the blame on dave which is ridiculous

-----------

I do take posts out of context - to emphasize what matters

you on the other hand - just don't give a fuck about it

humming around, trying to stomp out wagon is what you do

pedit:

In post 549, Io wrote:Yeah uh 546 is completely taken out of context there.

see?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #551 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:26 pm

You know, what, I don’t need what seems to be blatant disrespect.

replace out

Lapsa · Post Post #552 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:30 pm

I'm sorry I've offended you. perhaps we can start over?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #553 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:32 pm

Sure. Let’s start with not disrespecting attempts at self-improvement. If you think I’m lying say it, but don’t couch it in sarcasm.

Lapsa · Post Post #554 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:35 pm

In post 553, Gamma Emerald wrote:Sure. Let’s start with not disrespecting attempts at self-improvement. If you think I’m lying say it, but don’t couch it in sarcasm.

I think you are lying

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #555 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:37 pm

OK. Why?

Lapsa · Post Post #556 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:45 pm

cause I'm solving the game

don't tell me you are lying unconsciously

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #557 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 8:14 pm

I’m asking what makes you think I’m lying.

Lapsa · Post Post #558 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 8:15 pm

you do

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #559 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 8:37 pm

Cool, nice to know you’re not going to actually try explain anything.

In post 550, Lapsa wrote: pedit:

In post 549, Io wrote:Yeah uh 546 is completely taken out of context there.
see?

wtf is this btw?
Yeah all I’m getting from you is that you’re trying to cut me down, not actually help me.

Lapsa · Post Post #560 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 8:41 pm

In post 559, Gamma Emerald wrote:Cool, nice to know you’re not going to actually try explain anything.
In post 550, Lapsa wrote: pedit:

In post 549, Io wrote:Yeah uh 546 is completely taken out of context there.
see?
wtf is this btw?
Yeah all I’m getting from you is that you’re trying to cut me down, not actually help me.

accusation from Io that you are taking things out of context

I am trying to cut you down. how come you expect me to help you?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #561 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 8:49 pm

Oh my god you’re fucking stupid.
IO WAS AGREEING WITH ME YOU FUCK
As for helping me, I’m trying to be genuine here and all I’m that you’re responding with is complete bone-headedness and downright refusal to help. If you think there’s a sliver of a chance I might be Town, actually fucking level with me here rather than continue to be an obnoxious pompous douche.

Lapsa · Post Post #562 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 8:56 pm

lick my balls you defensive emo scum dumbfuck. go ahead and replace out to another dimension

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #563 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 9:00 pm

No screw you. I’m staying in and I don’t think you’re Town after all this. If you are, then you’re officially a shitty person.
VOTE: Lapsa

Lapsa · Post Post #564 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 9:01 pm

so brave

took you 8 pages to finally omgus

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #565 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 9:08 pm

Cool
Have fun explaining why you took 2 posts out of context and bent them to your agenda
Scumfuck

Lapsa · Post Post #566 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 9:16 pm

rushed pedit is what it is

Lapsa · Post Post #567 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 9:30 pm

as for #547:

I'm suspecting that you are thinking way too much about derailing your wagon

by very definition - slips must be out of context

In post 453, Gamma Emerald wrote: You just called your own logic shitty, gj

did I vote?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #568 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 9:31 pm

Here comes the backpedal!
Why didn’t you admit you were wrong while I was trying to work with you? I think you just BSed that logic. And even if that one was rushed now you have to address the fact that I’m not the only one saying the original thing was taken out of context.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #569 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 9:31 pm

In post 567, Lapsa wrote:as for #547:

I'm suspecting that you are thinking way too much about derailing your wagon

by very definition - slips must be out of context

In post 453, Gamma Emerald wrote: You just called your own logic shitty, gj
did I vote?

Already explained this to someone else: wasn’t aware you weren’t serious.

Lapsa · Post Post #570 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 9:50 pm

Spoiler: TEH CONTEXT

I'm seriously thinking that #77 is a shitty reason for a vote

@Gamma Emerald how does me being serious or not affects your vote on tictac?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #571 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:39 pm

That’s not what you took out of context you fucking snake! It’s just lies, lies, and more BULLSHIT from you all the time!
To answer the question, not at all, because even if you weren’t serious it was worth pressing.

Lapsa · Post Post #572 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:50 pm

@Gamma Emerald

on a scale from 0 to 10

how would you assess your push on tictac?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #573 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 11:02 pm

In post 572, Lapsa wrote:@Gamma Emerald

on a scale from 0 to 10

how would you assess your push on tictac?

Probably a 3: it had mild use but was ill-founded

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #574 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2018 11:04 pm

That’s dodging the main issue at hand: you misrepresenting me by taking my post out of context.