Now, that I obviously know it was fake, I interpreted it as an extreme reaction test. Reaction tests are far more likely to done by town for obvious reasons.
if you legitimately respond to a dayvig claim on this site then you're scum
Or new you cad
hurr fucking durr my dude
do you get off making completely irrelevant statements to whats going on
I've obviously taken that into consideration when I said ON THIS SITE which implies they have a handle on the site meta
Now, that I obviously know it was fake, I interpreted it as an extreme reaction test. Reaction tests are far more likely to done by town for obvious reasons.
if you legitimately respond to a dayvig claim on this site then you're scum
Or new you cad
Do you think Vax could be scum then - based on that?
Lady Angel also took it seriously but she seems to be new to this site.
No, I actually don’t agree anyway, but I forgot to say that.
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 427, Innocent Children wrote:I’m not a fan of Chick’s posts but the sheer number of players currently sr her - without any apparent opposition makes me hesitant to vote there.
@Chickadee , what are these “gifts” that you keep offering to send to anyone who sr you? Can you please elaborate some more on that?
Or, you know, maybe they are scum and scum dont want to save them...
You can’t both be sr Chick and also believe this.
Scum always want to save scum? Or your thinking they are town and scum would be white knighting them?... but then they would be town. Im confused.
Vaxkiller is not anti-vaccine, he is a killer of Vax machines.
In post 441, Nosferatu wrote:do you get off making completely irrelevant statements to whats going on
or maybe he's just scum? Like I agree that his postings are irrelevant and don't aid in scumhunting.
THIS
is the Gamma that I know, so naturally, when he wasn't being his normal angry self I scum read him for it in heros. Would scumGamma go "let me play to my irrationally angry millennial persona."? Or maybe his angry-useless gameplay just aren't a very good way to read him.
Vax's reaction to the wagon on him seems underwhelming to me.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Also pretty much everyone (save for a few) have played with me, and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch. Unless you guys are going to provide actual reasons, votes off me please.
In post 441, Nosferatu wrote:do you get off making completely irrelevant statements to whats going on
or maybe he's just scum? Like I agree that his postings are irrelevant and don't aid in scumhunting.
THIS
is the Gamma that I know, so naturally, when he wasn't being his normal angry self I scum read him for it in heros. Would scumGamma go "let me play to my irrationally angry millennial persona."? Or maybe his angry-useless gameplay just aren't a very good way to read him.
Vax's reaction to the wagon on him seems underwhelming to me.
While I don’t really take offense at being called a millennial I’ll have you know I’m pretty sure I’m actually in Generation Z.
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
To clarify about things I'm sending, I picked Gin before anything had even happened. I did it right after my first post. I picked her because it was someone I thought I could connect with.
I sent Stargazer something right after she serious-voted me.
And I just sent Innocent Children something, because they were curious.
So far, the only person to give any reason for voting me is Nero, and it's a shit reason.
My read on Vax was about something specific he said. I can't recall what it was now, but I remember reading it and being pinged.
Looking back I can't find what it was either. But I did find
In post 370, Vaxkiller wrote:I don't like mastina here, I'll wait until they prove themselves, but more than likely their fake claim time will expire and then we can push there.
@jjh, why nero?
Sounds like a plan for pushing Mastina regardless of actions later.
but being lynchbait doesn't mean you can't roll scum.
Pork, its whats prodging today.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Not Voting: Rylai and Lina, Gamma Emerald, Skygazer, Titus, KuroiXHF, Porkens, Whemestar, Vecna, Wh4t
With 22 alive it's 12 to lynch.
The day will end in (expired on 2018-09-25 18:00:00)
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 427, Innocent Children wrote:I’m not a fan of Chick’s posts but the sheer number of players currently sr her - without any apparent opposition makes me hesitant to vote there.
@Chickadee , what are these “gifts” that you keep offering to send to anyone who sr you? Can you please elaborate some more on that?
Or, you know, maybe they are scum and scum dont want to save them...
You can’t both be sr Chick and also believe this.
Scum always want to save scum? Or your thinking they are town and scum would be white knighting them?... but then they would be town. Im confused.
I’m saying, unless it’s fake, they can’t all be scum, because scum already has scum chat - so no reason ever for scum to PM scum.
Also pretty much everyone (save for a few) have played with me, and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch. Unless you guys are going to provide actual reasons, votes off me please.
Chick, why is your RVS vote still on me? I should ask Lady Angel the same thing. Lol
Also pretty much everyone (save for a few) have played with me, and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch. Unless you guys are going to provide actual reasons, votes off me please.
Also pretty much everyone (save for a few) have played with me, and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch. Unless you guys are going to provide actual reasons, votes off me please.
Chick, why is your RVS vote still on me? I should ask Lady Angel the same thing. Lol
Also pretty much everyone (save for a few) have played with me, and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch. Unless you guys are going to provide actual reasons, votes off me please.
Chick, why is your RVS vote still on me? I should ask Lady Angel the same thing. Lol
I am a firm believer that votes do not matter
Lemme rephrase this cause I suck at wording things
Keeping a vote on someone and say you scumread someone else doesn’t matter
In post 456, Chickadee wrote:To clarify about things I'm sending, I picked Gin before anything had even happened. I did it right after my first post. I picked her because it was someone I thought I could connect with.
I sent Stargazer something right after she serious-voted me.
And I just sent Innocent Children something, because they were curious.
Yes, I can confirm I received a “gift” from Chick. Based on her play on Labrynth, I doubt she’d do that as scum.
Also pretty much everyone (save for a few) have played with me, and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch. Unless you guys are going to provide actual reasons, votes off me please.
Chick, why is your RVS vote still on me? I should ask Lady Angel the same thing. Lol
I am a firm believer that votes do not matter
Lemme rephrase this cause I suck at wording things
Keeping a vote on someone and say you scumread someone else doesn’t matter
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
