Mini Normal 2033: Dolphins (Game Over)

[GuerillaWoo]

Wrong
I don’t think Saudade’s current actions are scummy

Ah well I guess I'll change my vote then lol

[EzekelRAGE]

I don’t read them as scummy either figure both sides are just kicking the tires.

Are you guys serious about the Dva thing in regards to the replacement? Is so that is scummy to me.

*shrug*

[GuerillaWoo]

"If you guys are serious then I think it's scummy but if not I don't think it's scummy I'm town btw"

[EzekelRAGE]

"If you guys are serious then I think it's scummy but if not I don't think it's scummy I'm town btw"

2 diff situations are they not?

[EzekelRAGE]

Just to clarify, when I say them I mean voting going on for dis/Db etc and that whole group.

Dva votes and ppl bringing up the other person drops out of red roles, I don’t like and I read as scummy. Couldn’t tell if they are serious or not.

[Doughboy]

por que roll of the eyes?

It is a really bad reason to scumnread somebody. I scum read somebody who was getting some pressure, logged in multiple times but didn’t post and I thought he was afraid he didn’t know how to respond. He flipped town.

[GuerillaWoo]

"If you guys are serious then I think it's scummy but if not I don't think it's scummy I'm town btw"

2 diff situations are they not?

It reads like you're asking for consensus or permission from us. Why not just vote for who you think is scummy? As opposed to trying to co-opt our approval.

por que roll of the eyes?

It is a really bad reason to scumnread somebody. I scum read somebody who was getting some pressure, logged in multiple times but didn’t post and I thought he was afraid he didn’t know how to respond. He flipped town.

I don't disagree tbh, you can't exactly ask a replacement to defend someone else's pre-game meta, but I don't see it as bad that we get some discussion based off of it rolling.

[Doughboy]

Rage does typically vote who he thinks he is scummy so that comment does raise concerns with me.

[Alchemist21]

Just to clarify, when I say them I mean voting going on for dis/Db etc and that whole group.

Dva votes and ppl bringing up the other person drops out of red roles, I don’t like and I read as scummy. Couldn’t tell if they are serious or not.

If I tell you I’m being serious then I’m being serious.

[GuerillaWoo]

I'm not a fan of how he said "I read it as scummy". Like, clearly the origin of his 'suspicion' isn't a read, it's Alchemist's meta guess.

Feels like a good place to nest my vote rn VOTE: Ezekiel but I still wanna hear something serious from Saudade.

[DVa]

VOTE: tommy

Takes the time to find a ss replace out but can't be bothered to check if this is the only game she replaced out of now (it's not)

Way to take a sitequit as a scum replaceout fam, good hunting there /s

[Doughboy]

that seems a little over the top.

[Tommy]

I like GuerillaWoo and Doughboy's push on EzekelRAGE. It's clear that at least Alchemist21 and I were serious, so why didn't EzekelRAGE vote one of us?

VOTE: EzekelRAGE

@DVa: I don't know how I would have checked that, but if this is about ongoing games let's change the subject.

[Doughboy]

How do we know scioness read his role pm?

[Tommy]

I don't think we know that.

[Saudade]

Dva is a terrible, terrible, name.

[Saudade]

Sadly thats not alignment indicative

[Saudade]

I don’t read them as scummy either figure both sides are just kicking the tires.

Are you guys serious about the Dva thing in regards to the replacement? Is so that is scummy to me.

*shrug*

I think the idea in itself that you are presenting is not scum-like
but the way you presented it.. oof! you deserve a few votes on you

[Gamma Emerald]

Dva is a terrible, terrible, name.

Have you played Overwatch?
Not much I found interesting beyond this
would like a breif explanation of ezekel case tho

[EzekelRAGE]

I like GuerillaWoo and Doughboy's push on EzekelRAGE. It's clear that at least Alchemist21 and I were serious, so why didn't EzekelRAGE vote one of us?

VOTE: EzekelRAGE

@DVa: I don't know how I would have checked that, but if this is about ongoing games let's change the subject.

I usually make statements while holding my vote.When I do vote I can just refer to my posts I made earlier. i post in the moment because I can be forgetful. it’s my play style/habit. *shrug*

Which brings me to this post.

Rage does typically vote who he thinks he is scummy so that comment does raise concerns with me.

You make this statement like we have played in a number of games.
You worded it in a way to make me seem like im playing differently/scummy.

We have played 1 game together, my first game on this board.

In that game I voted day 1 because Lafayette asked for votes, I obliged.

Day 2 I voted you because I had a theory on you and didn’t like your hammer.

Day 3 where I basically made it me vs ff as the lynch, i attacked ff thru most of the day phase and never voted him, even though the lynch was guaranteed to be me vs him. When I did vote, I voted myself.

Throughout that game I made posts on how I thought something Lafayette did appeared scummy. On more than one occasion Lafayette called me out for not voting him. Again I explained I hold my votes.

So can you provide proof about how I “typically” vote who I think is scummy so early? I provided examples on how that is not the case at all.

[EzekelRAGE]

I'm not a fan of how he said "I read it as scummy". Like, clearly the origin of his 'suspicion' isn't a read, it's Alchemist's meta guess.

Feels like a good place to nest my vote rn VOTE: Ezekiel but I still wanna hear something serious from Saudade.

Well, can’t do anything about that, but it won’t be the last time you see that phrase or something similar to it from me.

Seriousness of the guess - my bad on missing/forgetting that part. Was reading thread earlier, was about to make post, got busy but tha part about lynching based on such a weak angle stuck out to me. When I got a little bit of free time again I made that post instead of going back and rereading that part. Only thing that changes is I view them as scummy for attempting it.

[Alchemist21]

VOTE: Saudade
Nothing better to do.

There was stuff to comment on by the time this post was made.

FOS on this slot.

[Doughboy]

You make this statement like we have played in a number of games.

No I made a statement based off my experience of you. 1 game is still better than no games.

[EzekelRAGE]

You make this statement like we have played in a number of games.

No I made a statement based off my experience of you. 1 game is still better than no games.

Provide proof, otherwise this reads to me like you were trying to add fire to a wagon.

[EzekelRAGE]

My problem is your wording. It’s very misleading. If you said I played 1 game with rage and he seemed to vote scummy. I would’ve corrected you on the seem part.

Using typically to me implies you have a good range of data to go on,certainly more than one game.

If I go to the casino once and win 2k, I can’t go typically I win 2k at the casino, because I haven’t been enuff times to say that.